Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Social care · Children's services visit (ILACS)

Setting

Inspected —

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Michelle Woodward (lead), Amanda Maxwell

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Amanda Maxwell, Michelle Woodward

  • Postcode verified

    RG40 1BN

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+46Positivemore positive than 88% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praiseeffectiveeffectivelyimprovedclearrobustwell supportedimprovingtrusting relationships
Criticismat riskconcernsharmvariablenot timely

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1244w+45
  • What needs to improve25w+20

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,268
shorter than usual (typical 1616)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 42, typical 39
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
1
typical 3
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 98%What needs to improve 2%

Full report text

Helen Watson Director of Children’s Services Wokingham Borough Council Wokingham RG40 1BN

p.1

services

This letter summarises the findings of the focused visit to Wokingham Borough Council local authority children’s services on 20 and 21 February 2024. His Majesty’s Inspectors for this visit were Michelle Woodward and Amanda Maxwell.

p.1

services

Inspectors looked at the local authority’s arrangements for children in need, including those children who are subject to a child protection plan.

p.1

services

This visit was carried out in line with the inspection of local authority children’s services (ILACS) framework. During this visit, inspectors spoke to senior leaders, managers, social workers and other social care staff. Inspectors also looked at children’s case records and local authority performance management and quality assurance information.

p.1

Headline findings

Senior managers have undertaken significant work to address the areas for improvement identified at the previous inspection in March 2023. This includes the timeliness of assessments and the quality of child-in-need and child protection plans. Each area has been carefully considered and appropriate improvement plans are now in place. Senior leaders, including the leader of the council, the lead member and the chief executive, have worked together effectively to improve the experiences and progress of children and to secure the investment required to enable the progress to continue. The quality assurance framework has been reviewed and updated, with a clear focus on improving the quality of supervision. Ofsted

p.1

Headline findings

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 Textphone 0161 618 8524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

What needs to improve in this area of social work practice?

◼ Continue the work on improving the consistency and quality of supervision. ◼ Engage parents and carers more fully in direct work with their children.

p.2

Main findings

Children in Wokingham benefit from receiving the right help at the right time. Children in need and those in need of protection, including disabled children, now receive the right level of support in line with their needs. Appropriate actions are taken to address risk when progress is not being made and there is a need to escalate. Thresholds are applied effectively and the rationale for decision-making is clear. When children’s risks or needs are reduced, the support to children and their families is adjusted accordingly.

p.2

Main findings

Children who are at risk receive a rapid response and strategy discussions are held in a timely way. Partner agency involvement is effective, with the relevant professionals providing the required information. This supports effective decision-making for children, helping to make them safer. Assessments of risk lead to suitable plans for next steps.

p.2

Main findings

The quality and timeliness of assessments of children’s needs have improved. Children now benefit from assessments which are comprehensive and detailed, exploring relevant aspects of the needs of the child and their family.

p.2

Main findings

Since the previous inspection, effective work has taken place with children experiencing long-standing neglect.There is now more robust action to ensure that plans do not drift and that timely decisions are made to reduce risks to children.

p.2

Main findings

Children benefit from stronger plans, which have been improved and simplified in consultation with families and staff. The plans address the concerns and are proportionate to need. Children and their parents are actively involved with key partners in the timely co-production of their plans. The plans provide clarity about what needs to be achieved, by whom and by when, in order to reduce the risks to children.These are shared with children in a way in which they can understand. The plans are reviewed effectively and updated to reflect the child’s changing needs.

p.2

Main findings

Children are able to build trusting relationships with their social workers, who are caring and understand their complex needs. Social workers show passion and tenacity in finding ways to engage the child’s family network. Most children are seen regularly by their social workers, in a variety of settings. Despite social workers’ efforts, some parents are not fully engaged with their children’s plans, which reduces their effectiveness in improving the progress and experiences of children.

p.2

Main findings

Children and their families have social workers who ensure that they gain an understanding about the child’s home life and their life outside of the home. If concerns increase for children, social workers meet with them more frequently. Social workers are child-focused and carry out appropriate direct work to gain an understanding of children’s views about their lived experiences. Parents also benefit from this and have described how the support and intervention have helped their families. Social workers and alternatively qualified workers use a variety of tools to achieve this.

p.2

Main findings

Children at risk of harm through exploitation are well supported by their workers, who focus on building effective relationships with them. The strategy and practice guidance for tackling harm outside of the home have recently been updated; this has been welcomed by practitioners. Social workers make effective use of tools to fully understand and assess children’s vulnerabilities and the risks that they face. Plans are formulated by the network. The plans help to reduce and minimise risk, making children safer as a result.

p.3

Main findings

Social workers are very aware of the impact of domestic abuse and substance misuse on children and their families. They signpost children and families to appropriate services to address this, while continuing to support the family.

p.3

Main findings

Children on the edge of care are comprehensively assessed and supported with planned intervention from a dedicated team. Children and families’ relationships are improved and developed, enabling many children to remain with their families. The dedicated team includes a range of staff with a variety of skills. These staff work alongside the social workers within a clear and complementary structure. Clear intervention plans are formulated which effect positive change for families.

p.3

Main findings

Leaders and managers in Wokingham have sharpened their focus on developing the consistency, impact, quality and effectiveness of their management oversight and supervision. Management oversight is mostly robust and is evident within case work, including signing off reports for children and providing clarity about next steps.

p.3

Main findings

The quality of supervision continues to be variable. Senior leaders know this and it is an ongoing area of focus for improvement. In stronger cases, supervision provides clarity and direction for next steps through reflective discussion. However, more work is needed to achieve greater consistency and timeliness for supervision to have maximum developmental impact.

p.3

Main findings

At a corporate level, there has been commitment to, and investment in, the recruitment and retention offer. Social workers have manageable caseloads, enabling them to have time for focused work with children and their families. This also enables them to attend training which helps them to reflect on their practice and develop their thinking.

p.3

Main findings

Social workers access a broad range of training, learning and development opportunities, including those that support the chosen practice model. There is a progression pathway available to social workers, which is supported by learning opportunities to become a practice educator. Other staff have access to employment pathways and programmes to enable them to become qualified social workers, for example.

p.3

Main findings

Newly qualified social workers who are in their assessed and supported year of employment are provided with regular support, learning and reflective supervision. This enables them to develop and progress their knowledge and skills and equips them for their developing social work roles.

p.4

Main findings

The reviewed and strengthened quality assurance framework has increased the level of audit activity, which the local authority uses well to inform the learning cycle. Audit activity demonstrates a reflective, self-critical and thoughtful approach, with a clear focus on the quality of work with children.

p.4

Main findings

Social workers feel well supported by visible leaders, managers and peers. Some staff have actively chosen to work in Wokingham because they appreciate the bespoke approach that makes them feel valued.

p.4

Main findings

Ofsted will take the findings from this focused visit into account when planning the next inspection or visit.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion