Summary
Russell Bennett (lead), Alan Blount, Bruce Goddard, Lauren Thorpe, Rebecca Iles-Smith
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
31 Jan 2024
- Inspectors verified
Alan Blount, Bruce Goddard, Lauren Thorpe, Rebecca Iles-Smith, Russell Bennett
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Requires improvement
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement
- Personal development verified
Requires improvement
- Quality of education verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
SE10 8HN
- Name on report verified
St Ursula’s Convent School
- URN verified
100193
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallRequires improvement
- Behaviour and attitudesRequires improvement
- Leadership and managementRequires improvement
- Personal developmentRequires improvement
- Quality of educationRequires improvement
15% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (5,043 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- This school was last inspected under section 5 of the Education Act 2005 nine years ago and judged ‘Outstanding’ under a previous inspection framework. p.1
- This reflected the school’s overall effectiveness under the inspection framework in use at the time. p.1
- From then until November 2020, the school was exempted by law from routine inspection, so there has been a longer gap than usual between graded inspections under section 5 of the Act. p.1
- Judgements in this report are based on the current inspection framework and also reflect changes that may have happened at any point since the last graded inspection. 30 and 31 January 2024 p.1
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Personal development3
“These include sports clubs, choir, and visits to places of local interest.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,270
- about usual (typical 1215)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 46, typical 56
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 4
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 14%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of St Ursula’s Convent School Crooms Hill, Greenwich, London SE10 8HN
p.1
Inspection dates: 30 and 31 January 2024
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Requires improvement Personal development Requires improvement Leadership and management Requires improvement Previous inspection grade Outstanding
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
This school was last inspected under section 5 of the Education Act 2005 nine years ago and judged ‘Outstanding’ under a previous inspection framework. This reflected the school’s overall effectiveness under the inspection framework in use at the time.
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
From then until November 2020, the school was exempted by law from routine inspection, so there has been a longer gap than usual between graded inspections under section 5 of the Act. Judgements in this report are based on the current inspection framework and also reflect changes that may have happened at any point since the last graded inspection. 30 and 31 January 2024
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
St Ursula’s offers an ambitious curriculum that helps many pupils to achieve well by the end of key stage 4. However, recent turbulence in leadership has resulted in limited oversight of the provision for pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). While most of these pupils follow the same curriculum as their peers, they do not consistently receive sufficient support to access learning and achieve well.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Recent changes at the school, including the appointment of new leaders, have increased the number of staff that pupils can talk to if they are worried about something. Pupils know who these staff are and understand how to report a concern. Staff make sure that there is support in place to keep pupils safe. Bullying does not happen often. However, pupils have been affected by a challenging period at the school and feel unsettled. Some pupils do not trust that adults will help them effectively, if they need it.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Behaviour around the school is generally orderly. Pupils are polite and courteous to visitors. At times, it is not as calm, including at less structured times of the day. The school has introduced a new behaviour policy, which sets out high expectations, though this is recent and not embedded in practice. In lessons, most pupils are attentive and show positive attitudes, although learning is occasionally interrupted by low-level disruption.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
The school provides a programme of extra activities and visits. These include sports clubs, choir, and visits to places of local interest. However, in some aspects of the curriculum, pupils do not have sufficient opportunities to discuss their ideas and to explore different perspectives fully.
p.2
better?
The curriculum is ambitious and at least matches the aims of what is expected nationally. The school has thought carefully about the knowledge that pupils should learn and the order in which this should be sequenced. This helps pupils to secure their understanding of important ideas before tackling more complex work. For example, in modern foreign languages, pupils explore different aspects of vocabulary and grammar, which increase in complexity as they move through the school. This builds their confidence in manipulating language, enabling them to develop greater fluency and expression in writing and speaking.
p.2
better?
Teachers have secure subject knowledge. They value the professional development opportunities that are provided to improve their practice. In most cases, pupils are provided with activities that enable them to deepen their knowledge and apply what they have learned. Teachers identify and address misconceptions, adjusting their planning and explanations to clarify pupils’ understanding. 30 and 31 January 2024
p.2
3
The school identifies pupils with SEND, but recent changes in staffing have resulted in information about pupils’ needs being shared inconsistently with teachers. Staff work with a range of external agencies and are provided with advice about how best to support these pupils. However, this information is not used consistently to cater for individual pupil’s needs. For example, sometimes, staff do not adapt activities and resources appropriately for pupils with SEND. In these cases, pupils do not complete work that enables them to practise what they have learned. This limits their understanding in different areas of the curriculum. Pupils who struggle with reading are given additional help to gain confidence and fluency.
p.3
3
Most pupils behave well around the school. They are positive in their attitudes to learning and show courtesy to visitors. Occasionally, behaviour is unsettled and falls below the school’s expectations. This results in less respectful attitudes in the school community. The school monitors attendance and takes action to promote improvement where concerns are identified, though it identifies that there is more to do to ensure that all pupils, including those with SEND, attend well.
p.3
3
The school has designed the personal, social, health and economic education curriculum to support aspects of pupils’ wider development. It provides pupils with information about future learning and careers. Pupils learn about different faiths and perspectives. They learn about staying healthy and keeping safe, including online. Pupils enjoy ‘drop-down days’, such as the recent celebratory event for St Angela’s Day. This programme is not delivered consistently, however, and pupils’ experience of coverage of the intended content varies. On occasion, pupils do not have enough opportunities to discuss their ideas, or to explore the views of others in sufficient depth.
p.3
3
The school provides opportunities for pupils to take up leadership roles and responsibilities, including as prefects. Pupils value this, but they do not see that there is sufficient action taken by the school in response to their discussions and recommendations.
p.3
3
Those responsible for governance understand the school’s strengths and weaknesses and fulfil their statutory duties. They are ambitious for pupils, have received appropriate training and hold leaders to account. However, this work is at the early stages and has therefore had limited impact on the school’s improvement. Many parents and carers share the view that further, sustainable improvements are needed at the school.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.3
4
The school does not ensure that teachers have sufficient information to adapt the delivery of the curriculum for the individual needs of pupils with SEND. Sometimes, these pupils do not get the support they need to learn effectively and secure the knowledge and understanding they should. The school should make sure that teachers have the information, knowledge and training they need to support pupils with SEND effectively. The school has recently introduced a new policy which that out high expectations for pupils’ behaviour. However, this is not embedded. The school should ensure that all staff receive the training and support they need to implement these expectations both in lessons and during less structured times of the school day. The programme of personal development and wider enrichment is not coherently planned and implemented. This means that pupils do not have a consistent experience of this aspect of their educational experience. The school should
p.4
4
ensure that the implementation of the programme covers all intended curriculum content fully, as well as providing sufficient opportunities for all pupils to discuss and debate ideas in a considered way.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.4
Further information
In the report, 'disadvantaged pupils' is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 30 and 31 January 2024
p.4
School details
Type of school Secondary Comprehensive School category Voluntary aided
p.5
School details
Appropriate authority The governing body
p.5
School details
Dates of previous inspection 11 and 12 March 2015
p.5
Information about this school
The school uses one registered alternative provider. The school has a Roman Catholic religious character. The school had its last section 48 inspection by the Diocese of Southwark in February 2023. The school meets the requirements of the provider access legislation, which requires schools to provide pupils in Years 8 to 13 with information and engagement about approved technical education qualifications and apprenticeships.
p.5
Information about this inspection
The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.5
Information about this inspection
Inspections are a point-in-time judgement about the quality of a school’s education provision. 30 and 31 January 2024
p.5
6
This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school. During the inspection, inspectors held meetings with the headteacher and other senior leaders. Inspectors met with governors, a representative from the Diocese and representatives from the local authority. Inspectors carried out deep dives in in English, mathematics, modern foreign languages, science and geography. They met with subject leaders to discuss the curriculum, visited lessons, and spoke with teachers and pupils. Inspectors looked at samples of pupils’ work. The curriculum in other subjects was also considered as part of the inspection. To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, inspectors: reviewed the central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the
p.6
6
extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first. Inspectors gathered the views of pupils, parents and carers, and staff through both discussion and responses to Ofsted’s online surveys.
p.6
Inspection team
Russell Bennett, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector
p.6
Inspection team
Rebecca Iles-Smith His Majesty’s Inspector 30 and 31 January 2024
p.6
7
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
7
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
7
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
7
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
7
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion