Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Bursley Academy

Inspected 21 Feb 2024 · published 19 Mar 2024 · URN 138043

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Requires improvement

Wayne Simner (lead), Alexandra Beardmore, Susan Plant

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    21 Feb 2024

  • Inspectors verified

    Alexandra Beardmore, Susan Plant, Wayne Simner

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Good

  • Early years verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Quality of education verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    ST5 8JQ

  • Name on report verified

    Bursley Academy

  • URN verified

    138043

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2012.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Behaviour and attitudesGood
  • Early yearsGood
  • Leadership and managementGood
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Quality of educationRequires improvement

15% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (5,043 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+39Positivemore positive than 77% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseenjoystrongthriveeffectiveconsistentlysecurehigh-qualitycaring
Criticisminconsistenciesvariableconcernstoo manylimitednot yetnot effectivelynot effective

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1165w+37
  • Safeguarding6w+33
  • What needs to improve82w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,224
about usual (typical 1215)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 56, typical 56
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
10%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 64%Safeguarding 0%What needs to improve 4%About the inspection 32%

Full report text

Inspection of Bursley Academy Bursley Way, Bradwell, Newcastle, Staffordshire ST5 8JQ

p.1

Inspection dates: 20 and 21 February 2024

p.1

Overall effectiveness Requires improvement

The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Good Early years provision Good Previous inspection grade Outstanding

p.1

Overall effectiveness Requires improvement

The headteacher of this school is Brian Wilkinson. This school is part of Collective Vision Trust, which means other people in the trust also have responsibility for running the school. The trust is run by the chief executive officer, Lynn Jackson and overseen by a board of trustees, chaired by Sarah Gribbin. 20 and 21 February 2024

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

The family feel of Bursley Academy is tangible the minute you walk through the doors. Caring relationships between staff and pupils are built into the foundations of the school. Pupils trust the staff to look after them, they describe the staff as their ‘guardians’. Pupils are friendly, cheerful and well mannered. They embody the welcoming nature of the school.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Leaders at all levels, including governors and the multi-academy trust (MAT), are always looking for ways to improve the school. They know that more work needs to be done to further improve the quality of education, so that pupils achieve well across the curriculum.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

There is a relaxed atmosphere around the school. Pupils enjoy coming to school and are rarely absent. Pupils enjoy learning alongside their friends, and they play cooperatively on the playground. In lessons, pupils listen well and focus on completing their work most of the time. However, if the work set for pupils is not matched to their needs, they become distracted and lose interest.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Parents and carers are overwhelmingly positive about the school. In particular, they value the fact that staff go above and beyond what is expected of them to help their children.

p.2

better?

Children get off to a great start in the early years. They thrive in a language-rich environment. Children enjoy learning new things every day and the staff give them lots of meaningful opportunities to do so. Staff know the children well and plan activities that build on what the children already know. Consequently, children connect new learning to what they have learned in the past. Staff maintain strong links with families throughout the year.

p.2

better?

The school has considered the order of learning within and across year groups in many subjects. They have set out the knowledge, skills and vocabulary that pupils will learn. This helps teachers to plan learning activities that build on what pupils have learned in the past. However, in a small number of subjects, there is more work to be done. In English, pupils are not given enough opportunities to apply their knowledge of spelling, punctuation and grammar in extended pieces of writing. Furthermore, too many pupils are not taking a pride in their work, and this is not being addressed. As a result, standards of handwriting and presentation are variable.

p.2

better?

Staff possess secure subject knowledge and explain new learning clearly. They model subject-specific language accurately, which pupils use in their own explanations. However, the school is not routinely making checks on what pupils already know to inform the choice of learning activities. As a result, some activities 20 and 21 February 2024

p.2

3

are too easy, and some are too difficult. This leads to pupils losing interest in their learning and limits how well they achieve.

p.3

3

The school is fostering a love of reading through high-quality texts in the English curriculum, regular storytimes, a well-stocked library and special events. Pupils enjoy reading and many have a favourite book. The teaching of phonics is well ordered and builds pupils’ phonic knowledge over time. In most instances, staff teach phonics well because they have secure subject knowledge. Currently, the school is looking at how the organisation of phonics teaching can be improved further.

p.3

3

The school identifies the needs of pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) accurately. Pupils with SEND are fully included in lessons and the wider curriculum. Staff are quick to step in if a pupil needs extra support. However, where learning activities are not well matched to pupils’ needs, this makes it difficult for pupils with SEND to access their learning.

p.3

3

Curriculum leaders possess the required subject knowledge and expertise to lead their subject areas. However, they have limited opportunities to make checks on how well their subject is being taught. As a result, they are not able to identify what is working well and address any areas that need to improve.

p.3

3

There is a strong level of pastoral care that is woven through the fabric of the school. Pupils know they are cared for, and they value this. Pupils have a secure understanding of healthy lifestyles. They value the roles and responsibilities they hold in school, such as prefects and librarians. Pupils know about the different types of families in their local community. They value the range of after-school clubs and trips that enrich their experiences in school, including the Year 6 residential trip.

p.3

3

Staff are proud to be a member of the Bursley team. Teachers say that workload is manageable, and they appreciate recent changes that support their work-life balance. Staff say that leaders are always available to listen to their concerns. Staff appreciate this.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 The writing curriculum is not yet fully developed. As a result, some pupils are not achieving as well as they could in writing. The school should continue to develop opportunities for pupils to apply their spelling, punctuation and grammar knowledge in sustained pieces of writing.  The school are not using formative assessment effectively to inform teaching and the selection of learning activities. As a result, some learning activities are too 20 and 21 February 2024

p.3

4

easy and some are too difficult, which limits pupils’ progress through the curriculum. The school should use formative assessment to inform next steps in pupils’ learning more consistently.  In some subjects, the school is not making effective checks on how well the curriculum is being taught. In these instances, inconsistencies relating to the implementation of the curriculum remain and pupils do not achieve as well as they could. The school should make effective checks on how well the curriculum is being delivered in all subjects, so that inconsistencies can be identified, and appropriate support put in place.  The school is not ensuring that pupils take pride in their work across a wide range of subjects. As a result, the quality of handwriting and presentation in pupils’ books is variable. The school should take action to ensure that pupils consistently take pride in their work across the curriculum.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, 'disadvantaged pupils' is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school's pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 20 and 21 February 2024

p.4

School details

Date of previous inspection 16 and 17 May 2012

p.5

Information about this school

 The school has a breakfast club and an after-school club. This provision is operated by an external provider.  The school is part of the Collective Vision MAT.  The school has a nursery that admits three-year olds.  The school does not use any alternative provision.

p.5

Information about this inspection

The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.5

Information about this inspection

 Inspections are a point-in-time judgement about the quality of a school’s education provision.  This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken this into account in their evaluation. 20 and 21 February 2024

p.5

6

 To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the inspectors reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first.  The lead inspector met with the headteacher, the chair of the local governing committee and the chief executive officer of the MAT.  Inspectors held meetings with a range of leaders to discuss provision for pupils with SEND, pupils’ behaviour, attendance, the early years and additional funding.  Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: early reading, English, mathematics, science and history. For each deep dive, inspectors held discussions about the curriculum, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work.  The lead inspector observed pupils reading to a familiar adult.

p.6

6

 Inspectors spoke to groups of pupils formally and informally about their learning and experiences at school. Three separate groups of pupils accompanied inspectors on personal development learning walks around the school.  Inspectors considered responses to Ofsted Parent View, and the free-text responses received during the inspection. Inspectors considered the responses to Ofsted’s staff survey.  Inspectors looked at a range of documentation. This included the school’s self- evaluation form, school development plan, school policies, curriculum documents, SEND records, behaviour records, attendance records and minutes of meetings held by the local governing committee.

p.6

Inspection team

Wayne Simner, lead inspector His Majesty's Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

Alexandra Beardmore Ofsted Inspector 20 and 21 February 2024

p.6

7

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion