Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Cherry Tree Academy

Inspected 31 Jan 2024 · published 14 Mar 2024 · URN 144400

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Requires improvement

Andrew Yeomans (lead), Judy Shaw, Shazia Azhar

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    31 Jan 2024

  • Inspectors verified

    Andrew Yeomans, Judy Shaw, Shazia Azhar

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Good

  • Early years verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Quality of education verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    WF8 2HN

  • Name on report verified

    Cherry Tree Academy

  • URN verified

    144400

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2020.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Behaviour and attitudesGood
  • Early yearsGood
  • Leadership and managementGood
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Quality of educationRequires improvement

15% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (5,043 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−4Mixedmore positive than 17% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisehighly skilledhigh expectationseffectivevery wellwell-sequencedambitioussafestrength
Criticismgapsfall behindtoo manynot consistentlyinconsistenciespersistently absentnot well preparednot effective

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1066w−7
  • Safeguarding6w+33
  • What needs to improve84w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,127
about usual (typical 1215)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 54, typical 56
Average sentence
12 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
6%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 64%Safeguarding 0%What needs to improve 5%About the inspection 31%

Full report text

Inspection of Cherry Tree Academy Cobblers Lane, Pontefract, West Yorkshire WF8 2HN

p.1

Inspection dates: 30 and 31 January 2024

p.1

Overall effectiveness Requires improvement

The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Good Early years provision Good Previous inspection grade Requires improvement

p.1

Overall effectiveness Requires improvement

The headteacher of this school is Adam Dawson. This school is part of Waterton Academy Trust, which means other people in the trust also have responsibility for running the school. The trust is run by the chief executive officer (CEO), Dave Dickinson, and overseen by a board of trustees, chaired by Steve Johnson. 30 and 31 January 2024

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Leaders have high expectations for all pupils who attend Cherry Tree Academy. This includes pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). The school’s expectations are not consistently realised across the curriculum.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Since the last inspection, the school has experienced some turbulence in staffing. Despite this, the curriculum has been redesigned to ensure that pupils’ learning builds over time. Staff deliver the curriculum with accuracy and understanding. In some curriculum areas, this work is very recent and its impact is not measurable.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils at Cherry Tree Academy are safe. They behave well in school and at breaktimes. Bullying happens rarely. Adults sort it out immediately. The school has invested wisely in learning resources and the learning environment. This includes step-out spaces throughout the school. These spaces support pupils to reflect on their behaviour and regulate their emotions, when needed.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

The school provides a range of extra-curricular clubs. These include singing and sports clubs. Opportunities for pupils to develop and explore their talents and interests are plentiful. The curriculum is enhanced by educational visits. These visits are carefully considered and link to the curriculum well.

p.2

better?

The school ensures that all pupils become readers. Pupils read in school every day. Reading sessions are delivered by highly skilled adults. They model the sounds that make up words precisely. This supports pupils’ phonics development. The books pupils take home to read with their parents and carers are well matched to their ability. This helps to develop pupils’ accuracy and fluency when reading. Adults identify when pupils fall behind. The school provides additional phonics sessions, which enable these pupils to catch up quickly.

p.2

better?

All curriculum areas have been reviewed by the school since the last inspection. Well-sequenced lessons build on what pupils already know. Teachers revisit pupils’ prior learning at the beginning of each lesson. This supports pupils to make links in their understanding. Pupils with SEND, with the support of practical resources such as recording frames, access the same curriculum as their peers. Teachers check pupils’ understanding during lessons. Currently, they use this information to identify gaps in pupils’ knowledge and skills. However, pupils in key stage 2 have too many existing gaps in their knowledge and understanding. These gaps are not being addressed quickly enough. These pupils are not as well prepared as they should be for their next stage of education.

p.2

better?

In some subjects, including reading and mathematics, the school checks on the implementation of the curriculum. It uses this information to make changes to the curriculum when needed. The curriculum is effective in these subjects. The curriculum is less effective in the subjects that the school has not checked. In these 30 and 31 January 2024

p.2

3

subjects, inconsistencies are not addressed and pupils are not learning as much as they should be.

p.3

3

Early years is a strength of the school. The provision is carefully planned. Activities encourage the children to practise and rehearse their learning. Children’s understanding is reinforced well. Adults’ subject knowledge is thorough. They have an accurate understanding of the next steps needed for children’s development. Adults use this understanding very well during their interactions with children. Language is modelled at every opportunity. This extends children’s understanding and the range of vocabulary they use.

p.3

3

The school has implemented a range of initiatives to improve pupils’ attendance. These are not having enough impact. Some pupils do not attend school regularly enough. These pupils miss valuable learning. They have gaps in their knowledge and understanding. These pupils fall behind their classmates in school.

p.3

3

Pupils are taught how to stay safe online. They are aware of the risks that they may face outside school. The school welcomes external visitors to support its delivery of the curriculum. This work aids pupils’ understanding, including their understanding of road safety. The school ensures that pupils are accepting and tolerant of others’ differences. Pupils talk with confidence and clarity about the importance of tolerance in today’s multi-cultural society.

p.3

3

The school has made a number of changes recently, including to the curriculum and its approach to managing behaviour. Staff are positive about these developments. They are well supported through training and professional development. Staff take pride in their work. The school is considerate and aware of the workload and well- being of staff.

p.3

3

The local governing body has been strengthened by the appointment of new governors. Governors provide regular support and challenge. They have assisted the school in identifying areas of its work that require further development. The governors report regularly to Waterton Academy Trust board. The trust deploys resources and staff accordingly.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 Too many pupils do not attend school regularly and too many are persistently absent. These pupils miss essential learning and fall behind their peers. The school should develop its work with parents further to ensure that these pupils attend school more often and on time. 30 and 31 January 2024

p.3

4

 The school has not checked on the impact of some curriculum initiatives. The success of these initiatives is unknown. The school should ensure that systems are put in place to check whether its ambitious vision is being realised across the curriculum.  Some older pupils have gaps in their knowledge and understanding. These pupils are not achieving as well as they should. The school must address the gaps in older pupils’ knowledge quickly to ensure that they are ready for the demands of secondary schooling.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, ‘ disadvantaged pupils ’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 30 and 31 January 2024

p.4

School details

Dates of previous inspection 11 and 12 March 2020, under section 5 of the Education Act 2005

p.5

Information about this school

 The headteacher took up post in February 2023.  There has been a high turnover of staff in the last 12 months.  The school does not make any use of alternative provision.

p.5

Information about this inspection

The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.5

Information about this inspection

 Inspections are a point-in-time judgement about the quality of a school’s educational provision.  This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. The lead inspector discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and has taken that into account in the team’s evaluation of the school.  During the inspection, the inspectors met with the headteacher and members of the senior leadership team. 30 and 31 January 2024

p.5

6

 The lead inspector met with representatives of the governing body and the trust’s CEO.  The inspectors considered the responses to Ofsted Parent View, including the free-text comments. The team considered the responses to Ofsted’s staff and pupil surveys. An inspector spoke with parents to gather their views and opinions about the school.  Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: early reading, mathematics, history and science. For each deep dive, the inspectors held discussions about the curriculum, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work.  To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the inspectors: reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first.

p.6

6

 The inspectors observed pupils’ behaviour around school and in lessons. They spoke with pupils to gather their views about behaviour and safeguarding in the school.

p.6

Inspection team

Andrew Yeomans, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

Judy Shaw Ofsted Inspector 30 and 31 January 2024

p.6

7

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion