Schools & FE · School monitoring visit
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Alex Thorp
- Postcode verified
S60 3LX
- Name on report verified
Newman School This letter sets out the findings from the monitoring inspection that took place on Tuesday
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- This letter sets out the findings from the monitoring inspection that took place on Tuesday 30 th January 2024, on behalf of His Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills. p.1
- The monitoring inspection was carried out under section 8(2) of the Education Act 2005 and took place because the school received a judgement of requires improvement at its previous graded (section 5) inspection. p.1
- The purpose of a monitoring inspection is not to grade the school’s overall effectiveness, but to identify and report on the school’s progress. p.1
- It is to highlight to the school and parents any improvements that school leaders have made since the school’s previous graded inspection. p.1
- During the inspection, I discussed with you, other senior leaders, staff, governors and the local authority the actions you have taken to improve the school since the most recent graded inspection. p.1
- We discussed the ongoing impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. p.1
- I also visited the early years, primary and Newman Resource sites. p.1
- I met with groups of pupils from all sites, including a virtual meeting with pupils from the Dinnington site, and reviewed a selection of curriculum documentation, governors’ minutes and behaviour plans. p.1
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 2
- Words of findings
- 652
- shorter than usual (typical 1570)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 49, typical 47
- Average sentence
- 19 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 3%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.1
Michaela Glarvey Acting Headteacher Newman School East Bawtry Road Rotherham South Yorkshire S60 3LX
p.1
Requires improvement monitoring inspection of Newman School
This letter sets out the findings from the monitoring inspection that took place on Tuesday 30 th January 2024, on behalf of His Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills. The monitoring inspection was carried out under section 8(2) of the Education Act 2005 and took place because the school received a judgement of requires improvement at its previous graded (section 5) inspection.
p.1
Requires improvement monitoring inspection of Newman School
The purpose of a monitoring inspection is not to grade the school’s overall effectiveness, but to identify and report on the school’s progress. It is to highlight to the school and parents any improvements that school leaders have made since the school’s previous graded inspection.
p.1
Requires improvement monitoring inspection of Newman School
During the inspection, I discussed with you, other senior leaders, staff, governors and the local authority the actions you have taken to improve the school since the most recent graded inspection. We discussed the ongoing impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. I also visited the early years, primary and Newman Resource sites. I met with groups of pupils from all sites, including a virtual meeting with pupils from the Dinnington site, and reviewed a selection of curriculum documentation, governors’ minutes and behaviour plans. I have considered all this in coming to my judgement.
p.1
Leaders have made progress to improve the school, but more work is
necessary for the school to become good.
p.1
Main findings
Since the last inspection, the new early years and primary school building has been completed and pupils have moved into their new classes. In addition, you were recently appointed as acting headteacher in the absence of the substantive headteacher. You, along with the senior leadership team, have managed these changes well, minimising the impact on pupils and staff. As a leadership team, you have kept your focus on the areas for improvement identified at the last inspection.
p.1
Main findings
Leaders have made significant improvements to the curriculum. Working in curriculum teams, leaders have identified the core knowledge, vocabulary and small steps of learning in each subject. Staff use this guidance effectively to plan learning opportunities within and across the four learning pathways. In the early years, there is now a clear progression in learning from when children enter the school through to the end of key stage 1. Leaders have started to consider the best ways to assess what pupils know and can remember. You should make sure that this remains a focus in the coming term.
p.2
Main findings
You have ensured that there is a comprehensive professional development offer for all members of staff. This ranges from externally accredited training through to weekly ‘light- bite’ sessions which respond to emerging staff need. Staff speak positively about these sessions and feel that they make professional learning accessible and relevant without adding to their workload. The governing body have a clear understanding of the development needs of the school. They provide skilled and focused challenge and support to leaders which is helping to keep the school moving forward.
p.2
Main findings
The introduction of the restorative approach to behaviour management and the individual pupil support plans have had a positive impact on behaviour across the school. The ‘TAG’ team provide effective support when pupils do not respond to in-class strategies. Staff now feel confident that they will get the right support at the right time to manage pupils’ behaviour and emotional needs.
p.2
Main findings
As a leadership team, you have found the support of the local authority highly beneficial in helping you to respond to the improvements needed in school. This includes the external evaluation and support that they have commissioned on your behalf. You are keen to continue your partnership with the local authority as you move towards your next inspection.
p.2
Main findings
I am copying this letter to the chair of the board of governors, the Department for Education’s regional director and the director of children’s services for Rotherham. This letter will be published on the Ofsted reports website.
p.2
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion