Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
Ings Farm Primary School
Summary
Carl Sugden (lead), David Roundtree, Moira Banks
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
31 Jan 2024
- Inspectors verified
Carl Sugden, David Roundtree, Moira Banks
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Good
- Early years verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Personal development verified
Good
- Quality of education verified
Good
- Postcode verified
TS10 2JZ
- Name on report verified
Ings Farm Primary School
- URN verified
145664
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallGood
- Behaviour and attitudesGood
- Early yearsGood
- Leadership and managementGood
- Personal developmentGood
- Quality of educationGood
66% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (5,043 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more warmly than most reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Progress & outcomes3
“They achieve equally well.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,076
- about usual (typical 1098)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 51, typical 55
- Average sentence
- 15 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 6%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Ings Farm Primary School Stirling Road, Redcar, North Yorkshire TS10 2JZ
p.1
Inspection dates: 30 and 31 January 2024
p.1
Overall effectiveness Good
The quality of education Good Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Good Early years provision Good
p.1
Overall effectiveness Good
Previous inspection grade Not previously inspected under section 5 of the Education Act 2005
p.1
Overall effectiveness Good
The headteacher of this school is Tim Bethell. This school is part of Galileo Multi- Academy Trust, which means other people in the trust also have responsibility for running the school. The trust is run by the chief executive officer, Jane Spence, and overseen by a board of trustees, chaired by Graeme McGregor.
p.1
Overall effectiveness Good
Ofsted has not previously inspected Ings Farm Primary school as an academy under section 5 of the Education Act 2005 as, until November 2020, the school was exempted by law from routine inspection, so there has been a longer gap than usual between inspections. Judgements in this report are based on the current inspection framework and also reflect changes that may have happened at any point since the last graded inspection of the predecessor school. 30 and 31 January 2024
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Ings Farm Primary school is a happy and thriving community. Pupils enjoy coming to school. They show great interest in their learning. Pupils benefit from a range of rich experiences, inside and beyond the classroom. The school provides parents with many opportunities to share in the achievements of their children. During the inspection, very many parents came into school to enjoy a vibrant mathematics event alongside their children.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
The school has high expectations of pupils. Pupils strive to meet these standards. The curriculum prepares pupils effectively for the next steps in their education. Children in the early years are particularly well prepared for Year 1. Pupils in Year 6 have the right knowledge and skills to make the transition to secondary school.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
The school motto of ‘our personal best’ is understood throughout the school. It is used to encourage achievement and good conduct. Pupils behave well at school. They are respectful towards one another. They understand how to be kind and considerate. If there are any disagreements, pupils trust adults to quickly put things right. The curriculum for personal development is effective in teaching pupils to keep themselves safe and healthy.
p.2
better?
Pupils learn a wide range of subjects that connect to create a coherent, logically sequenced curriculum. The curriculum prompts pupils to transfer what they learn from one subject to another. For example, topics on circuits and the water cycle in science connect with work in design and technology and geography. The history curriculum takes advantage of the rich local history of Captain James Cook. Pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) study the same curriculum alongside their peers. They achieve equally well. However, in some curriculum subjects, the activities and the questioning of pupils do not provide teachers with enough information about what pupils know and understand. This means that the staff do not routinely identify misconceptions and gaps in pupils’ learning.
p.2
better?
The foundations of the effective curriculum begin in Nursery. Adults have a strong understanding of the individual starting points of children. They establish the initial foundations of communication and language to prepare pupils well for the later teaching of phonics. In the Nursery and Reception classes, children are highly engaged with the rich curriculum. Children with SEND make a particularly strong start in the Nursery.
p.2
better?
The school promotes and teaches reading effectively. Pupils benefit from a consistent approach to the teaching of phonics and opportunities for repeated practice. There is rapid and effective support for any pupil that needs to catch up 30 and 31 January 2024
p.2
3
with their reading. The school adapts the early reading programme particularly well for pupils with SEND. All pupils learn to read with fluency and confidence.
p.3
3
The school has ensured that pupils’ personal development is given a high priority. The curriculum for personal development is well planned. Pupils throughout the school have an age-appropriate grasp of all aspects of safety. This ranges from risks and hazards such as open water and railways, to an age-appropriate understanding of online safety. The school has a particularly proactive and effective approach to the teaching of mental health and well-being. Pupils have a firm understanding of the range of faiths and cultures that exist in modern Britain.
p.3
3
Pupils engage in a wide range of clubs and activities. Leaders plan sporting fixtures well to fit with the clubs on offer, so that pupils have a chance to put their skills to the test. The school is a vibrant community hub, this helps to provide a range of further enrichment opportunities for pupils. Most parents are engaged and supportive of the school. Comments in Ofsted’s online survey of parents, during the inspection, typically referred to the strength of the pastoral care in the school.
p.3
3
Members of the trust board liaise effectively with members of the local governing board. Each understands their role in supporting and challenging the school. The school uses a developing network of support, provided by the trust, for leaders at all levels to share ideas. Staff appreciate these opportunities for their professional development. Staff are complimentary about working at the school; they feel valued. Leaders consider the workload and well-being of staff carefully.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
There is an inconsistent approach to assessment in some curriculum subjects. Teachers do not routinely and systematically check what pupils know and understand. This means that some pupils do not receive prompt feedback to check and correct any misconceptions. The school should continue to work on implementing formative assessment strategies to provide pupils with clear and timely feedback.
p.3
How can I feed back my views?
or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection. 30 and 31 January 2024
p.3
4
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.4
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a so- cial worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 30 and 31 January 2024
p.4
School details
Date of previous inspection Not previously inspected
p.5
Information about this school
This is a larger than average primary school. The school uses no alternative provision. The school offers wraparound provision, with a breakfast club and after-school club.
p.5
Information about this inspection
The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.5
Information about this inspection
Inspections are a point-in-time judgement about the quality of a school’s education provision. This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school. 30 and 31 January 2024
p.5
6
Inspectors met with the headteacher, senior leaders, middle leaders and a range of teachers and other staff. The lead inspector met with members of the governing body, trustees and the chief executive of the trust. Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: early reading, mathematics, history and physical education. For each deep dive, the inspectors met with subject leaders, discussed the curriculum, visited a sample of lessons, spoke with some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of their work. To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, inspectors: reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first. Inspectors studied a variety of documents. These included the school’s development plan, minutes of governing body meetings, attendance information
p.6
6
and safeguarding records. The lead inspector considered the responses to Ofsted’s online survey for staff. Inspectors considered the views of parents through Ofsted’s online survey, Ofsted Parent View, and by meeting with parents at the end of the school day.
p.6
Inspection team
Carl Sugden, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector
p.6
Inspection team
David Roundtree Ofsted Inspector 30 and 31 January 2024
p.6
7
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
7
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
7
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
7
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
7
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion