Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School monitoring visit

Setting

Inspected — · published 12 Mar 2024

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Sue Maguire (lead), Annabel Davies

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Annabel Davies, Sue Maguire

  • Postcode verified

    SE6 2SE

  • Name on report verified

    Conisborough College This letter sets out the findings from the monitoring inspection that took place on 1

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−17Mixedmore positive than 17% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseimprovedeffectivepositiverobustswiftlyconsistentclear
Criticismpoorrequires improvementdisruptiondisruptiveconcernsinconsistency

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings483w−8
  • What needs to improve218w−43

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
699
shorter than usual (typical 1570)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 47, typical 47
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 69%What needs to improve 31%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

John Cavadino and Kate Mahar Co-headteachers Conisborough College Conisborough Crescent Catford London SE6 2SE

p.1

Requires improvement monitoring inspection of Conisborough College

This letter sets out the findings from the monitoring inspection that took place on 1 February 2024, on behalf of His Majesty's Chief Inspector of Education, Children's Services and Skills. The monitoring inspection was carried out under section 8(2) of the Education Act 2005 and took place because the school has received three successive judgements of requires improvement at its previous graded (section 5) inspections. I was accompanied by Sue Maguire, His Majesty’s Inspector.

p.1

Requires improvement monitoring inspection of Conisborough College

The purpose of a monitoring inspection is not to grade the school's overall effectiveness, but to identify and report on the school's progress. It is to highlight to the school and parents any improvements that school leaders have made since the school's previous graded inspection.

p.1

Requires improvement monitoring inspection of Conisborough College

During the inspection we discussed with you, other senior leaders, members of the interim executive board and representatives from the United Learning Trust the actions that have been taken to improve the school since the most recent graded inspection. We discussed the ongoing impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. We met with curriculum leaders including the leader for personal, social and health education (PSHE), visited a sample of lessons, met with groups of pupils and staff, and considered documentation related to school improvement. We have considered all this in coming to our judgement.

p.1

Leaders have made progress to improve the school, but more work is

necessary for the school to become good.

p.1

Main findings

Since the last graded inspection of the school in April 2022, there have been several changes to the roles and responsibilities of senior leaders. In June 2023, the school appointed two co-headteachers to lead the school. Also at this time, an interim executive board of governors was set up by Lewisham local authority to provide support to the school. The school is in the process of joining the United Learning Trust.

p.2

Main findings

The school has increased the breadth of subjects in the curriculum for pupils to study to meet the ambition of the national curriculum. You have made changes to the subject- options selection process for pupils in Year 9 to encourage more pupils to take the English Baccalaureate (EBacc) suite of subjects at GCSE. Curriculum thinking in many subjects is undergoing development. You have expanded the PSHE curriculum so that pupils in Year 11 now receive age-appropriate information including relationships and sex education through weekly lessons.

p.2

Main findings

Teaching staff have received training on the effective use of assessment to check what pupils know and can remember. Staff use formative assessment to identify and address with greater confidence misconceptions that pupils may have. You have swiftly put in place a new literacy strategy to help identify and support any pupils who need additional support with their reading. Teaching across subject areas has an increased focus on developing pupils’ skills in oracy and literacy.

p.2

Main findings

You have relaunched the school’s behaviour policy. Teachers have been trained to be more consistent in following and applying the school’s behaviour policy. Behaviour in the school is typically calm and orderly. Staff and pupils commented that behaviour in lessons is generally improved. However, low-level disruption continues to impact pupils’ learning in some lessons. You have improved systems to track and manage instances of disruptive behaviour. Some staff raised concerns about the inconsistency of actions taken when pupils are removed from lessons due to poor behaviour.

p.2

Main findings

You have provided a clear programme of professional development for staff. Staff commented that they have seen the positive impact of the training they have received. The interim executive board has prioritised the wellbeing of staff when making important decisions. They have provided robust support to the school during this time of change. Staff feel well-informed about changes that happen at the school.

p.2

Main findings

The United Learning Trust has provided external support to develop the school’s curriculum and assessment practices. The trust has also worked with you to improve the management of pupils’ behaviour. This support has been received well by staff at the school.

p.2

Main findings

I am copying this letter to the chair of the executive board, the Department for Education's regional director and the director of children's services for Lewisham. This letter will be published on the Ofsted reports website. Yours sincerely

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion