Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Somerset Studio School

Inspected 25 Jan 2024 · published 8 Mar 2024 · URN 142125

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Kelly Olive (lead), Christine Lacey

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    25 Jan 2024

  • Inspectors verified

    Christine Lacey, Kelly Olive

  • Postcode verified

    BA3 3NQ

  • Name on report verified

    Somerset Studio School

  • URN verified

    142125

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+49Positivemore positive than 48% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisethriveproudpositivesuccessfullyextremelyambitioushigh-qualitystrong
Criticismseriousdisruptiveconcernslowerstruggledo not knownot clear

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1176w+47
  • Safeguarding6w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,181
about usual (typical 1153)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 55, typical 55
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
3
typical 4
Hedged sentences
5%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 69%Safeguarding 0%About the inspection 31%

Full report text

Inspection of a good school: Somerset Studio School Knobsbury Lane, Radstock, Somerset BA3 3NQ

p.1

Inspection dates: 24 and 25 January 2024

p.1

Outcome

Somerset Studio School continues to be a good school.

p.1

Outcome

The headteacher of this school is Bruce Hain. This school is part of Midsomer Norton Schools Partnership, which means other people in the trust also have responsibility for running the school. The trust is run by the chief executive officer, Alun Williams, and is overseen by a board of trustees, chaired by Anthony Thomas Wells.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils thrive at this inclusive and nurturing school. They are proud to belong to the Somerset Studio School community. Staff know pupils as individuals. A large proportion of pupils that attend this school have a special educational need and/or disability (SEND). These pupils are well supported to make progress on their chosen courses, but also to develop their personal and social skills. Parents and carers say the school takes the time to get to know their child well.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

The school is a safe and welcoming environment. Classrooms are calm. Disruptive behaviour is extremely rare. Pupils celebrate what makes people different. They treat each other and visitors respectfully. Students in the sixth form are positive role models for younger pupils.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils share their views and bring about change as part of the school council, for example. Pupils enjoy a range of extra-curricular activities, such as team-building activities in the woods. They participate in research and development, such as the orchid project and reptile club. Some pupils complete the Duke of Edinburgh’s Award. Although many pupils benefit from such opportunities, the school does not have an overview of whether all pupils have equal access to all that the school has to offer.

p.1

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

The school provides an ambitious curriculum that is tailored to the interests and needs of its pupils. Although the 2023 key stage 4 published outcomes are lower than is typical nationally, pupils join the school at the age of 14 so do not experience their full curriculum journey here. The school, with the support of the trust, reviews the curriculum regularly 24 and 25 January 2024

p.1

2

to ensure that pupils receive the most appropriate offer. For example, T levels have been introduced this academic year for students in the sixth form. The school also benefits from the expertise of trust leaders in subjects including English, mathematics and science.

p.2

2

Subject leaders carefully consider what is important for pupils to learn. They sequence this knowledge in a logical order and plan for it to be revisited regularly. This enables pupils to successfully build on what they already know. Teaching skilfully puts this into practice. Teachers use a range of approaches to check what pupils remember over time. This helps to inform curriculum planning and pupils’ next steps.

p.2

2

Teachers are experts in their subjects. Staff demonstrate to pupils how their learning is transferable to industry. For example, in engineering, students in the sixth form grapple with the complexities of using computer-aided design software. In forensic science, students visit the local court and a prison to learn more about the criminal justice system.

p.2

2

Pupils with SEND are equipped with the resources they need to learn successfully. For example, some pupils use laptops so that they are familiar with this way of working prior to examinations. Staff use the information they receive about pupils’ needs to tailor their teaching. The special educational needs and disabilities coordinator (SENDCo) works closely with pupils and their parents to support pupils with SEND to succeed.

p.2

2

Some pupils who join the school struggle with reading. The school quickly identifies these pupils. They are provided with appropriate support to help them to catch up. Additionally, staff understand the benefits of pupils reading a range of fiction and non-fiction texts regularly. They provide opportunities to do so within the school day.

p.2

2

The school encourages pupils to be aspirational for their futures. Pupils and students in the sixth form receive high-quality guidance to help them to plan their next steps in education or employment. The school has formed positive links with employers. Pupils have access to a broad and rich choice of work placements. They learn about how to transfer their knowledge to the workplace.

p.2

2

Pupils follow a varied and interesting personal development curriculum. They know how to keep themselves safe when online. They also have a strong awareness of the importance of looking after their mental health. Pupils have a mature and detailed understanding of the protected characteristics. They are proud to give examples of how the school community upholds them. Pupils are confident in their knowledge of British values and so are well prepared for life in modern Britain.

p.2

2

Staff say this is a special place to work in. They value being part of the wider multi- academy trust. It allows them to share good practice and access professional development opportunities. They then use this learning to enhance the quality of education that pupils and students in the sixth form receive. 24 and 25 January 2024

p.2

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 The school does not have a clear oversight of pupils’ participation in extra-curricular activities. Therefore, they do not know which pupils benefit from these opportunities. The school should check that pupils have equal access to all that the school has to offer.

p.3

Background

When we have judged a school to be good, we will then normally go into the school about once every four years to confirm that the school remains good. This is called an ungraded inspection, and it is carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. We do not give graded judgements on an ungraded inspection. However, if we find evidence that a school would now receive a higher or lower grade, then the next inspection will be a graded inspection, which is carried out under section 5 of the Act. Usually this is within one to two years of the date of the ungraded inspection. If we have serious concerns about safeguarding, behaviour or the quality of education, we will deem the ungraded inspection a graded inspection immediately.

p.3

Background

This is the first ungraded inspection since we judged the school to be good in March 2018.

p.3

How can I feed back my views?

find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.3

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.3

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.3

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, 24 and 25 January 2024

p.3

4

looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 24 and 25 January 2024

p.4

School details

Local authority Bath and North East Somerset Council

p.5

form

Dates of previous inspection 15 and 16 March 2018, under section 5 of the Education Act 2005

p.5

Information about this school

 Since the previous inspection, the school has become independent from Writhlington School and no longer shares leadership or teaching staff.  The school does not use any alternative provision.  The school meets the requirements of the provider access legislation, which requires schools to provide pupils in Years 8 to 13 with information and engagement about approved technical education qualifications and apprenticeships. 24 and 25 January 2024

p.5

Information about this inspection

The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.6

Information about this inspection

 Inspections are a point-in-time judgement about the quality of a school’s education provision.  This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school.  Inspectors held discussions with the headteacher, other senior leaders, the SENDCo, subject leaders, members of the local governing body, the school improvement partner, the chief executive officer of the trust and a trustee.  Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: English, science and technology, including engineering. For each deep dive, inspectors discussed the curriculum with subject leaders, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work.  To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, inspectors: reviewed the single central

p.6

Information about this inspection

record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first.  Inspectors considered responses to the online survey for parents, Ofsted Parent View, including free-text comments. Inspectors also considered responses to the staff survey and responses to the survey for pupils.

p.6

Inspection team

Kelly Olive, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

Christine Lacey Ofsted Inspector 24 and 25 January 2024

p.6

7

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion