Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Ripley Infant School

Inspected 1 Feb 2024 · published 7 Mar 2024 · URN 112612

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    1 Feb 2024

  • Inspectors verified

    Katherine Chadbourne, Paul Halcro

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Good

  • Early years verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Quality of education verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    DE5 3RY

  • Name on report verified

    Ripley Infant School

  • URN verified

    112612

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2016.

  • OverallGood
  • Behaviour and attitudesGood
  • Early yearsGood
  • Leadership and managementGood
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Quality of educationGood

66% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (5,043 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+50Positivemore positive than 35% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseenjoyambitioushigh expectationscleareffectivewell plannedwell-plannedsafe
Criticismnot alwayslacksgaps

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1094w+49
  • Safeguarding6w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,068
about usual (typical 1098)
Reading level
Plain English
Flesch 63, typical 55
Average sentence
12 words
Next steps
5
typical 4
Hedged sentences
19%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 68%Safeguarding 0%About the inspection 32%

Full report text

Inspection of Ripley Infant School Kirk Close, Off Highfield Way, Ripley, Derbyshire DE5 3RY

p.1

Inspection dates: 30 January and 1 February 2024

p.1

Overall effectiveness Good

The quality of education Good Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Good Early years provision Good Previous inspection grade Good 30 January and 1 February 2024

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils enjoy attending Ripley Infant School. They say they like learning new things. A typical comment from pupils is that the school is ‘amazing’. The school has high expectations of how pupils should conduct themselves. Pupils understand the school’s ‘ASPIRE’ (achievement, safe, passion, individuality, resilience and exploration) values. They say the values help them know how to behave and treat others. Staff use praise well to reinforce these values. This means most pupils behave well.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

At playtime and lunchtime, pupils enjoy taking part in different activities. Most pupils play well together. Pupils say that bullying happens sometimes. They know staff will deal with any issues if they do occur. Pupils feel safe in school. They know who they can talk to if they have any worries.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils enjoy taking on different responsibilities in school. Some pupils are ‘playground buddies’, and some are ‘mini leaders’. These pupils help to organise games and support other pupils. Pupils also enjoy taking part in the school council. The school provides a range of extra-curricular activities for pupils. Many pupils attend these. They enjoy participating in the choir and other sports clubs, such as football, archery and dodgeball.

p.2

better?

The school has created an ambitious curriculum for all pupils, including those with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). The curriculum is well planned. The school has set out the knowledge and vocabulary pupils will learn in each subject. This ensures that it is clear how pupils will build their knowledge over time.

p.2

better?

Most teachers deliver the curriculum well. They have good subject knowledge. Teachers explain new learning clearly. They question pupils well to check their understanding. Teachers also recap what pupils have learned previously. This helps pupils to remember what they have learned. For example, pupils in Year 2 were confident in recalling what they had learned about The Great Fire of London. Sometimes, teachers do not use activities that are well matched to the intended learning. This means that sometimes pupils do not learn as well as they could.

p.2

better?

The school has prioritised reading. Staff are well trained to deliver the phonics programme. Pupils start learning the skills they need to read as soon as they start school. Staff ensure that pupils quickly learn the letter sounds they need to be able to read. Staff use assessment well to identify pupils with gaps in their phonics knowledge. These pupils then get daily support. The books pupils read are well matched to the sounds pupils know. Staff use opportunities throughout the day to recap the sounds pupils have learned. Pupils also have daily guided reading sessions and story times. As a result, most pupils learn to read fluently. 30 January and 1 February 2024

p.2

3

The school has ensured that a clear process for identifying the needs of pupils with SEND is in place. Teachers get information about how to meet the needs of these pupils. At times, this information lacks detail. Pupils with SEND access the same curriculum as other pupils. However, not all teachers adapt how they teach or support these pupils well. This means some pupils with SEND do not achieve as well as they could.

p.3

3

Children in Reception benefit from a well-planned curriculum. Staff use many opportunities to develop the children’s communication and language skills. The regular use of stories and songs supports children in learning ambitious vocabulary. There are clear routines that all children follow. They are well cared for. The activities that staff use ensure that children progress well in all areas of learning. Children are well prepared for key stage 1.

p.3

3

A clear behaviour system is in place that all staff and pupils understand. Staff regularly reward pupils for behaving well. Some pupils get extra support to help them manage their behaviour. This means that most pupils know how to behave. The school works well with families to support pupils to attend regularly. Pupils’ attendance is improving.

p.3

3

The school has planned well for pupils’ broader development. Pupils learn how to be safe when online. They learn about healthy eating. They have opportunities to learn about democracy. For example, pupils vote for the books they read during story time. Pupils know to be kind to others. They experience a range of trips that enhance the curriculum. They get to visit different places of worship to learn about various religions.

p.3

3

Staff are proud to work at the school. They feel well supported. Governors know the school well and provide effective challenge and support.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 Teachers’ activity choices do not always support pupils in learning the curriculum as they are not always well matched to the intended learning. This means some pupils do not learn as well as they could in some subjects. Teachers should ensure that activities are suitable for the intended learning.  Teachers do not always have the necessary information about pupils’ individual needs. They sometimes do not meet the needs of pupils with SEND well. This means that some of these pupils do not always access the curriculum and do not achieve as well as they could. The school should ensure that teachers get precise information about how to meet the needs of these pupils. The school should also 30 January and 1 February 2024

p.3

4

ensure that staff know how to meet these needs so that all pupils with SEND can access the curriculum and achieve well.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 30 January and 1 February 2024

p.4

School details

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.5

School details

Website www.ripley-inf.derbyshire.sch.uk

p.5

School details

Dates of previous inspection 1 and 2 February 2022, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005

p.5

Information about this school

 The school does not use any alternative provision.

p.5

Information about this inspection

The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.5

Information about this inspection

 Inspections are a point-in-time judgement about the quality of a school’s education provision.  Inspectors discussed any continued impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school.  To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, inspectors reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first.  Inspectors met with the headteacher and the deputy headteacher.  Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: early reading, mathematics, 30 January and 1 February 2024

p.5

6

history and English. For each deep dive, inspectors held discussions about the curriculum, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work.  Inspectors also discussed the curriculum and visited lessons in some other subjects.  Inspectors visited registration and assembly.  Inspectors met with groups of pupils from a range of year groups, including pupils with SEND.  Inspectors considered the responses to Ofsted Parent View, including the free- text responses. Inspectors also considered the responses to Ofsted’s staff questionnaires. An inspector spoke with parents at the school gate.  The lead inspector met with a representative of the local authority.  The lead inspector met with governors, including the chair.  Inspectors considered pupils’ behaviour at various times of day, including in lessons, around the school site and at lunchtime.

p.6

Inspection team

Paul Halcro, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

Katherine Chadbourne Ofsted Inspector 30 January and 1 February 2024

p.6

7

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion