Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Early years · Early years inspection (EIF)

Camberwell After School Project

Inspected 24 Jan 2024 · published 6 Mar 2024 · URN 107507

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Inadequate

Katie Smith

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Group verified

    Camberwell After School Project

  • Group reference verified

    RP910337

  • Inspection date verified

    24 Jan 2024

  • Inspectors verified

    Katie Smith

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Inadequate

  • Leadership and management verified

    Inadequate

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Inadequate

  • Personal development verified

    Inadequate

  • Previous overall verified

    Requires improvement

  • Quality of education verified

    Inadequate

  • Postcode verified

    SE5 0JY

  • Name on report verified

    Camberwell After School Project

  • URN verified

    107507

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2023.

  • OverallInadequate
  • Behaviour and attitudesInadequate
  • Leadership and managementInadequate
  • Personal developmentInadequate
  • Quality of educationInadequate

5% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (17,905 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−53Criticalmore positive than 24% of reports of this type graded Inadequate
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectivemake good progresshigh-qualityeffectivelyconsistentenjoystrengthconsistently
Criticismpoornot alwaysweaknessesconcernsnot consistentlynot effectiveunacceptablefailed

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings852w−79
  • Safeguarding180w+43

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,000
about usual (typical 972)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 44, typical 51
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
3
typical 1
Hedged sentences
6%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 55%Safeguarding 12%About the inspection 34%

Full report text

Inspection of Camberwell After School Project 14 Badsworth Road, Camberwell, London SE5 0JY

p.1

Overall effectiveness Inadequate

The quality of education Inadequate Behaviour and attitudes Inadequate Personal development Inadequate Leadership and management Inadequate Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Requires improvement

p.1

The provision is inadequate

Leaders and practitioners do not keep children safe in the nursery. They do not assess the risk of activities according to the age, ability and needs of the children accessing them, which compromises children's safety.

p.2

The provision is inadequate

Significant weaknesses in leadership mean that not all statutory requirements are met. This impacts on children's learning, development and well-being. The provider does not support the manager well enough. They do not ensure that the manager meets the responsibilities of her role. The manager has additional responsibilities that restrict her from completing all aspects of her role effectively. For example, as well as being the manager, she is actively working with the children. She does not feel able to prioritise supervisions and provide support for practitioners to help them continually improve the curriculum and outcomes for children.

p.2

The provision is inadequate

Despite previous concerns being raised about the quality of behaviour management, leaders have failed to implement effective behaviour management strategies. Practitioners are not always able to successfully manage unwanted behaviour and children do not learn what is expected of them. For example, when children are hurting each other or running indoors, they are not given an explanation as to why this is unacceptable.

p.2

need to do better?

n Practitioners are not deployed effectively so that children are supervised at all times to help ensure their safety. For example, younger children have access to scissors at a cutting and sticking activity without adult supervision. The poor risk assessment means children are at risk of harm. n Children do not have positive attitudes towards learning. They become bored and do not engage fully in the activities on offer. The poor implementation of the curriculum means children do not make good progress in their learning. The manager and practitioners do not always ensure that children are supervised well enough. For example, children access an activity involving shaving foam, which can be ingested, without adult supervision. This poor practice significantly impacts children's behaviour and compromises children's safety. n The manager understands how to observe and track children's development and identify gaps or emerging needs. However, she does not have a good

p.2

need to do better?

understanding of what she wants children to learn. Expectations for children are not consistently high enough across all age groups in the nursery. Children are not provided with an ambitious curriculum that challenges and extends their learning and development. This means that children do not consistently engage in meaningful learning, and children with special educational needs and/or disabilities do not receive the support they need to reduce gaps in their

p.2

need to do better?

24 January 2024 development. n The key-person system is ineffective. It does not support the learning and care needs of all children. Currently, the manager is the key person for all children. Other practitioners do not always know essential information about children, such as next steps or approaches to behaviour. This means that practitioners cannot use this information to support children's needs. This has a negative impact on children's sense of safety and security and their emotional well-being. n Practitioners do not receive effective supervisions that they need to support and improve their professional skills and teaching. Although the manager recognises that supervisions have not been completed, she is restricted by time because she is working directly with the children. This has a negative impact on the quality of education the children receive. n The provider has not supported the manager to implement a consistent routine

p.2

need to do better?

that supports children's personal, social and emotional development, and enhances children's learning. For example, when story time is announced to the children, the practitioner is distracted, and this is not followed through. Other practitioners do not take over to keep the routine in place. Children find it difficult to settle, because they do not know what to expect next during their day. This compromises their emotional security and creates a barrier to learning. n Practitioners do not teach children what is expected of them. Children do not follow instructions and do not transition well at lunchtime. For instance, children leave the table throughout lunchtime to play with toys. Children do not take their plates to the kitchen counter when asked. Practitioners do not teach children the impact their actions have on others. n Despite significant weaknesses in the setting, the manager and practitioners

p.3

need to do better?

have knowledge and understanding of the procedures to follow if they have concerns about any children in their care. They encourage children to learn good hygiene routines. Children brush their teeth, wash their hands and use the toilet. Practitioners are inconsistent when supporting independence skills. They provide too much support during handwashing routines and put on coats for some children while encouraging others to try to do it themselves. n Practitioners help children to develop their physical skills. Children have access to outdoor space to move in different ways. They enjoy the climbing equipment as they explore in many ways to climb and balance. This supports their muscle development and core strength.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective.

p.3

Safeguarding

There is not an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts children's interests first.

p.3

Due date

implement effective risk assessments to identify any risks to children's health and safety, and ensure that action is taken to reduce or minimise risks in a timely way 22/02/2024

p.4

Due date

improve the oversight of the setting to ensure that the manager meets the responsibilities of their role and that staff receive the support they need to improve their practice 22/02/2024

p.4

Due date

implement effective supervision for practitioners which provides them with coaching to help children make good progress 22/02/2024

p.4

Due date

implement a behaviour management strategy, that is consistently implemented by practitioners, that helps children to understand what is expected of them 22/02/2024

p.4

Due date

ensure that an effective key-person system is in place to meet children's individual needs, build settled relationships, and promote their emotional well-being 22/02/2024

p.4

Due date

develop the quality of education so that children are provided with consistent, high-quality learning and interactions 22/02/2024

p.4

Due date

develop a routine that supports children to settle, develop independence and contribute to the care of the nursery environment. 22/02/2024

p.4

Setting details

Unique reference number 107507 Local authority Southwark Inspection number 10278223 Type of provision Childcare on non-domestic premises

p.5

Registers

Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register, Voluntary Childcare Register Day care type Full day care

p.5

inspection

Total number of places 20 Number of children on roll 20 Name of registered person Camberwell After School Project

p.5

reference number

Telephone number 020 7708 2711 Date of previous inspection 24 January 2023

p.5

Information about this early years setting

Camberwell After School Project registered in 1994 and is located in the London Borough of Southwark. The project operates during term time from 8.30am to 6pm, Monday to Friday. A team of three staff works with the children, including the nursery manager. Staff in the nursery hold relevant childcare qualifications at level 3. During the school day, the nursery 'Beanstalks' offers funding for children aged two, three and four years. Children of school age attend the after-school club.

p.5

Inspection activities

n The inspector discussed any continued impact of the pandemic with the provider and has taken that into account in their evaluation of the provider. n The inspector viewed the provision and discussed the safety and suitability of the premises. n Children communicated with the inspector during the inspection. n The inspector talked to staff at appropriate times during the inspection and took account of their views. n The inspector spoke with the manager about the leadership and management of the setting. n The inspector observed the quality of education being provided, indoors and outdoors, and assessed the impact that this was having on children's learning. n The inspector spoke to several parents during the inspection and took account of their views. n The manager showed the inspector documentation to demonstrate the suitability of staff.

p.6

Inspection activities

We carried out this inspection under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children's learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.

p.6

Inspection activities

24 January 2024 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.6

Inspection activities

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

Inspection activities

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk

p.7

Inspection activities

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

Inspection activities

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion