Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
St John Fisher Catholic College
Summary
Andrew Madden (lead), David Hermitt, Neil Warner, Nicola Beech, Stuart Clarkson
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
14 Dec 2023
- Inspectors verified
Andrew Madden, David Hermitt, Neil Warner, Nicola Beech, Stuart Clarkson
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Requires improvement
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement
- Personal development verified
Good
- Quality of education verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
ST5 2SJ
- Name on report verified
St John Fisher Catholic College
- URN verified
140802
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2016.
- OverallRequires improvement
- Behaviour and attitudesRequires improvement
- Leadership and managementRequires improvement
- Personal developmentGood
- Quality of educationRequires improvement
15% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (5,043 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- This is because there are leaders at all levels who have not had sufficient support or training to enable them to achieve consistently high-quality provision in their area of responsibility. p.3
- The sixth form is a strength of the school, where the curriculum is delivered to a more consistently high standard. p.2
- Attendance is high, and leaders have worked effectively to build positive relationships with families to ensure that pupils attend school regularly. p.3
- effectively to ensure that the quality of provision is consistently high across the school. p.4
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- This has had some success, but there remain inconsistencies in how behaviour is addressed, and too often poor behaviour is not challenged effectively by some staff. p.3
- However, pupils are clear that there are inconsistencies, and too often lessons are disrupted by poor behaviour. p.2
- Too often, pupils’ books show this lack of understanding of key knowledge, with incomplete work or work which does not build on what they already know. p.2
- Although support is in place for younger pupils with weaker reading skills, the support for older pupils who struggle with reading p.2
- Leaders do not consistently check how effectively improvements have been p.4
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Previous inspection grade Not previously inspected under section 5 of the Education Act 2005 p.1
- The headteacher of this school is Garrett Murray. p.1
- This school is part of Christ the King Catholic Collegiate Multi Academy Company, which means other people in the trust also have responsibility for running the school. p.1
- The trust is run by the chief executive officer, Theresa Madden, and overseen by a board of directors, chaired by Gillian Regan. 13 and 14 December 2023 p.1
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 8
- Words of findings
- 1,462
- about usual (typical 1215)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 46, typical 56
- Average sentence
- 17 words
- Next steps
- 4
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 16%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of St John Fisher Catholic College Ashfields New Road, Newcastle Under Lyme, Staffordshire ST5 2SJ
p.1
Inspection dates: 13 and 14 December 2023
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Requires improvement Personal development Good Leadership and management Requires improvement Sixth-form provision Good
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
Previous inspection grade Not previously inspected under section 5 of the Education Act 2005
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
The headteacher of this school is Garrett Murray. This school is part of Christ the King Catholic Collegiate Multi Academy Company, which means other people in the trust also have responsibility for running the school. The trust is run by the chief executive officer, Theresa Madden, and overseen by a board of directors, chaired by Gillian Regan. 13 and 14 December 2023
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Many pupils are happy at St John Fisher Catholic College. That said, for too many pupils, their educational experience is variable, and they find this frustrating. This variability includes the quality of education and how leaders ensure consistent standards of good behaviour. The sixth form is a strength of the school, where the curriculum is delivered to a more consistently high standard. Students in the sixth form appreciate this, as well as the advice and guidance they receive.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Leaders have worked on improving behaviour. However, pupils are clear that there are inconsistencies, and too often lessons are disrupted by poor behaviour. Leaders recognise that there is more to do to ensure consistency in the application of the behaviour policy. Pupils say they feel safe in school and are clear that there is a trusted adult they could talk to if they had concerns. In social times, pupils generally behave well. Leaders are working on improving pupils’ punctuality, but this remains variable for some pupils.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils can access a wide range of opportunities, such as The Duke of Edinburgh’s Award, an ethos team, a dance group, a robotics group for the sixth form and an eco-stewardship team. There are also residential trips. Pupils value these opportunities.
p.2
better?
The quality of education is too variable for pupils. Leaders have planned the curriculum carefully for most subjects, although the key knowledge that pupils need to learn is not always clear. In addition to this, pupils do not have sufficient time to study creative subjects in key stage 3. Pupils learn the intended curriculum well when teachers select appropriately ambitious tasks that take into account what pupils already know. However, teachers do not check carefully enough whether pupils have understood the key knowledge. This means that gaps in pupils’ knowledge persist. Too often, pupils’ books show this lack of understanding of key knowledge, with incomplete work or work which does not build on what they already know. Leaders have started work on developing reading, and have identified weaker readers who need support. Although support is in place for younger pupils with weaker reading skills, the support for older pupils who struggle with reading
p.2
better?
has not had sufficient impact to improve their reading skills.
p.2
better?
In the sixth form, the curriculum is much more effectively designed and delivered. Teachers check for understanding and adapt the learning accordingly. Although published outcomes are low, leaders have worked effectively to ensure that the quality of education is more secure for these students. Students appreciate the range of activities on offer to them, as well as the advice and guidance they receive about post-18 destinations.
p.2
better?
Pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) have their needs accurately identified, and teachers are provided with useful information to adapt 13 and 14 December 2023
p.2
3
their learning activities. For pupils with education, health and care plans (EHC plans), these are well used by teachers to adapt the learning. However, there are inconsistencies in how teachers adapt learning to meet pupils’ needs for those pupils who do not have EHC plans. This means that some of these pupils with SEND do not always achieve as well as they should.
p.3
3
Leaders have reset expectations of pupils’ behaviour around the values of ‘The Fisher Way’: ready, respect, curious, responsibility, pride and resilience. This has had some success, but there remain inconsistencies in how behaviour is addressed, and too often poor behaviour is not challenged effectively by some staff. Thanks to close supervision, at social times pupils generally behave considerately towards each other. Leaders have a number of new systems in place to support pupils who struggle to meet the school’s expectations. Their analysis shows some success in improving behaviour, although there remain groups of pupils who continue to need more support.
p.3
3
Attendance is high, and leaders have worked effectively to build positive relationships with families to ensure that pupils attend school regularly. However, there remain some pupils who still miss too much school. Leaders have recently led a new strategy on punctuality, which is having a positive impact for some pupils.
p.3
3
The school’s work around pupils’ personal development is a strength. Leaders have ensured the curriculum covering pupils’ personal, social, health and economic education is comprehensive and well resourced. Pupils discuss protected characteristics in a mature way. Leaders have also worked effectively to provide a range of extra-curricular opportunities for pupils. These include a residential trip for Year 7 pupils and a mathematics trip. Pupils’ understanding of future opportunities is enhanced by work experience opportunities, work with the national citizenship service and other links to local employers. There are appropriate links with post-16 and post-18 providers.
p.3
3
Governors and the directors have not secured consistent improvements in key areas identified in the last ungraded inspection. In addition, leaders do not have a fully accurate evaluation of the quality of provision at St John Fisher Catholic College. This is because there are leaders at all levels who have not had sufficient support or training to enable them to achieve consistently high-quality provision in their area of responsibility. Staff appreciate the way that leaders are mindful of their workload and well-being at the school.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective. 13 and 14 December 2023
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
Pupils’ understanding is not checked systematically, which means that learning is not adapted well enough to meet pupils’ needs, including for some pupils with SEND. This means that some pupils do not successfully build their learning on what they already know, and gaps in their knowledge persist. The school should ensure that all teachers use assessment effectively to identify gaps in pupils’ knowledge and then adapt the curriculum to ensure pupils learn the key knowledge they need to build successfully on future learning. The school has not provided sufficient support to all pupils who struggle with their reading. As a result, some pupils do not develop fluency in reading well enough. The school should accelerate its programme of support for reading, including phonics, and ensure it is provided for all pupils who need it. Leaders do not consistently check how effectively improvements have been
p.4
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
embedded in their areas of responsibility. As a result, some development areas that are less effective are not identified and addressed. Leaders need to ensure that leaders at all levels know how to monitor the impact of their work, so that improvements in education in all aspects of the school lead to better pupil outcomes. Some staff do not apply the new behaviour policy consistently. As a result, some pupils do not meet the school’s expectations or do not focus on the learning. The school needs to ensure that all teachers apply the behaviour policy as intended, so that behaviour across the school is of a consistently high standard. Governors and the board of directors have not supported and challenged leaders effectively enough to improve the quality of education. As a consequence, weaknesses in the quality of provision have persisted. Those responsible for governance need to ensure that they support leaders and hold them to account
p.4
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
effectively to ensure that the quality of provision is consistently high across the school.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school. 13 and 14 December 2023
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.5
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 13 and 14 December 2023
p.5
provision
Number of pupils on the school roll 1,121
p.6
sixth form
Website http://www.saintjohnfishercc.co.uk/
p.6
sixth form
Dates of previous inspection 15 and 16 June 2022, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005
p.6
Information about this school
St John Fisher Catholic College is an academy within the Christ the King Catholic Collegiate Multi Academy Company. The school uses three registered alternative providers. The school meets the requirements of the provider access legislation, which requires schools to provide pupils in Years 8 to 13 with information and engagement about approved technical education qualifications and apprenticeships. The school is of Roman Catholic denomination. It was last inspected under section 48 of the Education Act 2005 in May 2023. 13 and 14 December 2023
p.6
Information about this inspection
The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.7
Information about this inspection
Inspections are a point-in-time judgement about the quality of a school’s education provision. Inspectors discussed any continued impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school. To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, inspectors: reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first. As a part of this inspection, inspectors met with the trust CEO, trust representatives, trustees, governors, a representative of the archdiocese, senior leaders, subject leaders, teaching staff and other employees in the school. They also scrutinised minutes of trustees’ and governors’ meetings. Inspectors carried out deep dives in: mathematics, science, geography, design
p.7
Information about this inspection
and technology and English. They also looked at examples of pupils’ work in other subjects. For each deep dive, inspectors held discussions about the curriculum, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work. Inspectors also visited lessons in some other subjects. Inspectors reviewed the school’s extra-curricular activities, enrichment programme and careers and personal development programmes with leaders and pupils. Inspectors reviewed the school’s behaviour and attendance records with school leaders. Inspectors met with members of staff and spoke to pupils, both formally and informally, at various points in the inspection. They took account of responses to a staff survey, a pupil survey and Ofsted Parent View, including the free-text responses.
p.7
Inspection team
Andrew Madden, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector
p.7
Inspection team
Nicola Beech His Majesty’s Inspector 13 and 14 December 2023
p.7
8
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.8
8
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.8
8
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.8
8
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.8
8
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.8
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion