Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Horton Lodge Community Special School

Inspected 24 Jan 2024 · published 29 Feb 2024 · URN 124496

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Anna Vrahimi (lead), Julie McBrearty

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    24 Jan 2024

  • Inspectors verified

    Anna Vrahimi, Julie McBrearty

  • Postcode verified

    ST13 8RB

  • Name on report verified

    Horton Lodge Community Special School

  • URN verified

    124496

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+66Positivemore positive than 73% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisevery wellambitioushighly effectivehighly skilledhappyhigh expectationseffectivepositive
Criticismnot clearseriousnot alwaysconcernslower

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1267w+66
  • Safeguarding6w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,271
about usual (typical 1153)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 51, typical 55
Average sentence
14 words
Next steps
2
typical 4
Hedged sentences
13%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 68%Safeguarding 0%About the inspection 32%

Full report text

Inspection of a good school: Horton Lodge Community Special School Rudyard, Leek, Staffordshire ST13 8RB

p.1

Inspection dates: 23 and 24 January 2024

p.1

Outcome

Horton Lodge Community Special School continues to be a good school.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils are happy at Horton Lodge Community Special School. They arrive at school smiling and excited. Pupils’ individual needs are well understood. They are well cared for by experienced staff.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

The school’s motto of ‘working hand in hand to achieve potential’ is realised here. Staff work closely with parents, carers and agencies. Together, they have created a strong community of support around each pupil. As a result, each pupil thrives at this school.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Leaders have high expectations for pupils’ behaviour. Staff see behaviour as a form of communication. They take time to understand what pupils are communicating and, when necessary, provide quick and effective support. This helps pupils to stay calm and settled in lessons and around school.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Strengthening independence and communication skills is central to pupils’ learning. The school’s approach of conductive education supports this. Daily activities focus on targeted physical movement as part of the specialist curriculum for pupils.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils experience a range of trips and activities. The school ensures that pupils with physical disabilities are able to access these opportunities. For example, older pupils take part in adventurous activities during residential trips. They also visit the theatre. All this helps to promote pupils’ independence further.

p.1

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

Since the last inspection, the school has made many positive changes. A new leadership team has focused on creating a curriculum that carefully meets the different needs of pupils. This curriculum is aspirational and has clear end points. Improvements have been made in many subject areas, particularly mathematics. The curriculum is designed to promote pupils’ communication, independence and movement successfully, including in the early years. However, in some areas of the curriculum, the school has not explicitly 23 and 24 January 2024

p.1

2

defined the knowledge, skills and vocabulary it wants pupils to learn to reach the ambitious end points of the curriculum. In these areas of the curriculum, it is not clear in what order pupils will learn essential knowledge. This means that the knowledge of some pupils does not build over time in a logical way.

p.2

2

Most staff are highly skilled and specialised in planning lessons for pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). All pupils have an education, health and care (EHC) plan to support their physical disabilities and other associated learning difficulties. Staff also support areas associated with communication, sensory, social and emotional needs. Leaders carefully and quickly establish the most appropriate communication strategies for each individual child. They set out these strategies in individual specialist plans for pupils. Teachers use their expertise to deliver well-structured lessons in line with pupils’ individual specialist plans. Staff use a range of communication systems and strategies in lessons and throughout the school day. All of this means that staff accurately meet the specific needs of pupils with SEND very well.

p.2

2

The school has a sharp focus on improving reading across the school. All classrooms have a wide range of books for pupils to enjoy and take home. Pupils love stories, reading and being read to. Their faces become animated when adults talk about books. Leaders are ambitious for pupils. They believe that all pupils have the potential to become readers. This focus on reading starts from the very beginning when pupils join the school. Pupils at the pre-reading stage are supported to identify environmental and instrumental sounds. Some pupils in the early years are beginning to identify letter names and phonemes. However, there is some variability in how the structured phonics programme is delivered to some pupils. This slows the learning of some pupils.

p.2

2

Relationships between staff and pupils are positive and respectful. Staff know individual pupils and their families very well. Staff use this knowledge positively to support pupils in lessons and at breaktimes and lunchtimes. Many pupils use additional, specialist equipment to support their mobility. Pupils form trusting relationships with the adults who look after them. For example, pupils have great confidence in the adults who help them to use additional specialist equipment to support their mobility.

p.2

2

Pupils experience a wide range of activities beyond the curriculum. Staff meticulously plan these activities so that pupils have the best experiences possible. These opportunities include residential trips away from home. Pupils greatly value these opportunities and talk about them with a great sense of achievement and enthusiasm. In addition, leaders ensure that pupils learn about how to keep themselves safe. For instance, pupils learn about how to keep themselves safe when online. All of this means that pupils are well prepared for their futures.

p.2

2

Staff feel well supported by the leadership team. Governors understand their roles well, and they fulfil their statutory duties. They support and challenge leaders effectively. Many parents are very happy with the care given to their children. Information sharing between the school and other agencies is highly effective. This includes the residential provision at the same site as the school. All this supports pupils’ learning and ensures that they are always safe. 23 and 24 January 2024

p.2

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 In some areas of the curriculum, the school has not explicitly defined the knowledge, skills and vocabulary it wants pupils to learn. It is also not clear in what order pupils will learn essential knowledge. This limits the progress of some pupils. The school should ensure that the curriculum clearly defines, in a logical sequence, the knowledge pupils will gain over time.  There is some variability in the implementation of the structured phonics programme. This is not always implemented in a clear, systematic way. This slows the progress in reading for some pupils. The school should provide staff with the knowledge and skills to deliver the phonics scheme effectively.

p.3

Background

When we have judged a school to be good, we will then normally go into the school about once every four years to confirm that the school remains good. This is called an ungraded inspection, and it is carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. We do not give graded judgements on an ungraded inspection. However, if we find evidence that a school would now receive a higher or lower grade, then the next inspection will be a graded inspection, which is carried out under section 5 of the Act. Usually this is within one to two years of the date of the ungraded inspection. If we have serious concerns about safeguarding, behaviour or the quality of education, we will deem the ungraded inspection a graded inspection immediately.

p.3

Background

This is the second ungraded inspection since we judged the school to be good in February 2013.

p.3

How can I feed back my views?

find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.3

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.3

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school. 23 and 24 January 2024

p.3

4

In the report, 'disadvantaged pupils' is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 23 and 24 January 2024

p.4

School details

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.5

School details

Date of previous inspection 11 October 2017, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005

p.5

Information about this school

 Since the last inspection, there have been several changes to leadership. The headteacher took up post in September 2021. A deputy headteacher was also appointed.  The school offers a specialist curriculum which places conductive education at the centre of its practice.  There is a residential provision on site called ‘Kiplings’, which is in a separate part of the school. This is led by the same headteacher. The inspectors only inspected provision at the school.  All pupils have an EHC plan for physical disabilities and/or associated learning difficulties. Pupils also have additional visual, hearing and/or speech and language difficulties and medical needs.  The school makes use of one registered alternative provider.  There were no two-year-olds on roll during this inspection. 23 and 24 January 2024

p.5

Information about this inspection

 Inspections are a point-in-time judgement about the quality of a school’s education provision.  This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school.  The inspectors met with the headteacher, deputy headteacher, chair of governors, additional representatives from the governing board, subject leaders, teachers and pupils. They also talked informally with transport escorts, drivers and staff.  The lead inspector spoke with one representative of the local authority.  Inspectors carried out deep dives in early reading, communication and mathematics. For each deep dive, inspectors held discussions about the curriculum, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work.

p.6

Information about this inspection

 The lead inspector observed pupils reading to a familiar adult.  To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, inspectors: reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first.  Inspectors considered responses to the online questionnaire for parents, Ofsted Parent View. This included free-text comments. Inspectors also looked at responses to Ofsted’s online staff survey.  Inspectors looked at a range of documentation provided by the school. This included the school’s self-evaluation, school policies, curriculum documents and SEND records.

p.6

Inspection team

Anna Vrahimi, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

Julie McBrearty Ofsted Inspector 23 and 24 January 2024

p.6

7

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion