Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Phoenix Nursery School

Inspected 30 Jan 2024 · published 29 Feb 2024 · URN 104281

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Barry Yeardsley (lead), Rebecca Cox

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    30 Jan 2024

  • Inspectors verified

    Barry Yeardsley, Rebecca Cox

  • Postcode verified

    WV2 3JS

  • Name on report verified

    Phoenix Nursery School

  • URN verified

    104281

Page 1 of 6
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+11Mostly positivemore positive than 11% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseenjoypositiveeffectivelyhigh expectationsstrongextremelynurturingcaring
Criticismnot alwaysnot consistentlyseriousconcernsgapslowernot clearnot precisely

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1149w+9
  • Safeguarding6w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
6
Words of findings
1,152
about usual (typical 1153)
Reading level
Plain English
Flesch 62, typical 55
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
5
typical 4
Hedged sentences
17%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 69%Safeguarding 0%About the inspection 31%

Full report text

Inspection of a good school: Phoenix Nursery School Phoenix Street, Blakenhall, Wolverhampton, West Midlands WV2 3JS

p.1

Outcome

Phoenix Nursery School continues to be a good school.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Phoenix Nursery School is a small, well-equipped nursery school at the heart of its community. The school is a nurturing and safe place to be. Relationships between adults, children and their parents are strong. Parents are extremely positive about the school and the support it provides for its children and families. The view of one parent was typical of many when they commented, ‘The school is like a family, and staff are caring and welcoming.’

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

All children, including those with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND), experience a wide range of activities. They follow routines and learn and play together effectively. Older children support those who have just started school. Most of the support adults provide helps children to achieve well.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Leaders have high expectations of children’s behaviour. They have thought thoroughly about their expectations of how children should behave. However, on occasion, staff do not reinforce these expectations consistently.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Children enjoy a wide range of experiences, both indoors and outdoors. They benefit from experiences such as visits to an outdoor learning centre and links to the music department at a local secondary school.

p.1

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

The school has thought carefully about its curriculum. Leaders have made it clear what children need to know and be able to do by the time they leave the school. As part of their work, leaders have considered the culturally rich community it serves. In many areas of learning, the school has identified the smaller steps children are expected to learn in order to reach longer-term goals. In mathematics, for example, the school has set out the steps children will follow in order to recognise small numbers of objects without counting. This is helping children to learn well in this area. However, in some areas of learning, these steps of learning are not always clear enough. Consequently, staff are sometimes 30 January 2024

p.1

2

unsure about what to teach and when. This means that children do not learn as well as they might in these areas.

p.2

2

Staff help children to build their communication and language skills well. They encourage children to learn new vocabulary and speak in sentences. Children enjoy sharing books and using the phrases they have learned to tell stories. All of this means that children are well prepared for future work on reading.

p.2

2

Staff use much of the knowledge they learn from children’s achievements to plan future learning. However, they do not always make sure that the activities they plan are well matched to address gaps in children’s learning. This means that, at times, children do not get the most benefit from their learning and play.

p.2

2

Children learn about the diverse world in which they live. They develop their personal and social skills. Children learn to cooperate with their peers and adults from different backgrounds and cultures. The curriculum is planned so that children learn more about people from different backgrounds as they get older. This prepares children effectively for future learning.

p.2

2

The school carefully considers the needs of children with SEND. It makes sure that these children’s needs are identified quickly and appropriate support is put in place. Staff support children with SEND well so that they can learn the full curriculum. For example, staff use signs and symbols to help some pupils develop their language skills.

p.2

2

Staff have developed the two school rules of ‘be kind’ and ‘be a good listener’. Signs and symbols are on display around school for staff to use with children. While staff do use and talk about these rules with children, they do not do this consistently enough. Consequently, children do not always understand how to behave and what is expected of them.

p.2

2

Leaders, including governors, make sure that they listen to staff. They engage with staff when looking at ways the school could be improved and are considerate of staff workload and well-being. Consequently, staff feel valued and enjoy working at the school. The school makes full use of the knowledge and skills available across the federation.

p.2

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.2

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 In some areas of learning, the school has not precisely identified the content it wants pupils to learn. As a result, sometimes, staff are unsure what children should learn and when. The school should ensure that all curriculum thinking sets out the key content that children need to know, and when, so they can learn well. 30 January 2024

p.2

3

 Staff do not consistently plan activities that extend teaching points during learning and play time. This means that, at times, children do not always get the most benefit from their learning and play. The school should enable staff to know how to support children’s learning across the day.  Staff do not always ensure that the school rules are learned and followed by children throughout the school day. This means that children do not always know how to behave and what is expected of them. The school should make sure that staff apply the school rules when working with children so they consistently learn positive behaviours.

p.3

Background

When we have judged a school to be good, we will then normally go into the school about once every four years to confirm that the school remains good. This is called an ungraded inspection, and it is carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. We do not give graded judgements on an ungraded inspection. However, if we find evidence that a school would now receive a higher or lower grade, then the next inspection will be a graded inspection, which is carried out under section 5 of the Act. Usually this is within one to two years of the date of the ungraded inspection. If we have serious concerns about safeguarding, behaviour or the quality of education, we will deem the ungraded inspection a graded inspection immediately.

p.3

Background

This is the second ungraded inspection since we judged the school to be good in March 2014.

p.3

How can I feed back my views?

find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.3

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.3

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.3

Further information

In the report, 'disadvantaged pupils' is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 30 January 2024

p.3

School details

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.4

School details

Dates of previous inspection 5 December 2017, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005

p.4

Information about this school

 The school is federated with Ashmore Park Nursery School.  The school does not use any alternative providers.

p.4

Information about this inspection

 Inspections are a point-in-time judgement about the quality of a school’s education provision.  This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. The inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school.  During the inspection, the lead inspector held meetings with the headteacher and four members of the governing body, including the vice-chair of governors.  To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the inspectors: reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first. 30 January 2024

p.4

5

 An inspector held a meeting with a representative of the local authority. She also spoke to parents and carers at the beginning of the school day.  The inspector carried out deep dives in communication and language, physical development and mathematics. The inspectors visited adult-directed sessions and observed continuous provision, scrutinised curriculum documents and talked with staff about the way these areas are planned and taught.  An inspector spoke with members of staff about their workload and well-being.  The inspectors observed children’s behaviour throughout the day.  The lead inspector considered the responses, including the free-text comments, to Ofsted Parent View. He also considered the responses to the staff surveys.  Inspectors looked at a range of documentation provided by the school. This included the school’s improvement priorities, school policies, curriculum documents, SEND

p.5

5

records, behaviour records, attendance records and minutes of meetings held by the governing board.

p.5

Inspection team

Barry Yeardsley, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector

p.5

Inspection team

Rebecca Cox Ofsted Inspector 30 January 2024

p.5

6

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.6

6

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.6

6

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.6

6

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.6

6

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.6

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion