Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Haybridge SCITT

Inspected 25 Jan 2024 · published 29 Feb 2024 · URN 70368

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Eve Morris (lead), Jonathan Leonard, Sultanat Yunus

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    25 Jan 2024

  • Inspectors verified

    Eve Morris, Jonathan Leonard, Sultanat Yunus

  • Postcode verified

    DY8 2XS

  • Name on report verified

    Haybridge Alliance SCITT

  • URN verified

    70368

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+70Positivemore positive than 68% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisehigh-qualityexceptionallypositivevery welleffectivelyhigh expectationsrigorousstrong
Criticismnot consistentlynot strongnot high-qualitynot consistent

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspection positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
882
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 42, typical 45
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
2
typical 5
Hedged sentences
2%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 55%About the inspection 45%

Full report text

Haybridge Alliance SCITT Haybridge High School and Sixth Form, Brake Lane, Hagley DY8 2XS

p.1

Inspection judgements

Primary and secondary age-phase combined

p.1

Overall effectiveness Good

The quality of education and training Good

p.1

Overall effectiveness Good

Leadership and management Good Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Good

p.1

What is it like to be a trainee at this ITE provider?

Trainees are overwhelmingly positive about training to teach at Haybridge. There is a fully inclusive culture that permeates through all aspects of the provider. Trainees are taught how to support pupils with a variety of learning needs, such as special educational needs and/or disabilities and those pupils who speak English as an additional language. This is also reflected in the course participants. One trainee commented, ‘Haybridge is very inclusive and encourages individuals from a wide variety of backgrounds.’

p.1

What is it like to be a trainee at this ITE provider?

Trainees are very well prepared to teach across a range of schools and settings. The programme ensures that trainees establish a deep understanding of how to safeguard pupils, how pupils learn and how to manage behaviour effectively. Primary trainees are well prepared to teach all of the national curriculum subjects, including early reading and systematic synthetic phonics. In addition, secondary trainees have strong specialist subject and pedagogical knowledge.

p.1

What is it like to be a trainee at this ITE provider?

Leaders have developed a high-quality training programme that reflects the needs of the local area. Leaders have established a ‘grow your own’ culture, where trainees are trained and employed locally. This is reflected in the course programme that is co-constructed in consultation with partnership schools.

p.1

What is it like to be a trainee at this ITE provider?

Trainees appreciate the care and support they are offered. They receive well-considered, personalised guidance to enable them to succeed. A typical view of the trainees is, ‘Leaders have been supportive, knowledgeable and considerate since day one on the course. They display a genuine passion for what they do and take pride in the course and its outcomes. I am honoured to be training with Haybridge.’

p.1

Information about this ITE provider

◼ Haybridge Alliance SCITT is a school-centred initial teacher training (SCITT) provider. ◼ The provider offers a range of routes into teaching. These include postgraduate pathways for primary and secondary trainees and a three-year undergraduate route, with qualified teacher status, for primary trainees. ◼ Postgraduate trainees study full time over one year. However, Haybridge also offers a part-time option to train over two years. Trainees can also take the opportunity to study for a Postgraduate Certificate in Education (PGCE) with Birmingham City University. ◼ The provider currently has 121 trainees. There are 70 trainees on the primary route. Trainees who follow the primary programme are trained to teach the three to seven or five to 11 age-phases. There are 51 on the secondary route. They are training to teach pupils aged 11 to 16 years or aged 14 to 19 years, depending on individual trainee’s subject specialism.

p.2

Information about this ITE provider

◼ There are 98 schools in the partnership, including 53 primary schools, 40 secondary schools and five special schools. ◼ The provider works with a range of primary and secondary schools of different sizes and varying contexts that are located across a range of local authorities. ◼ There are seven schools in the partnership which are rated as requires improvement or inadequate by Ofsted. All other schools in the partnership are graded as either good or outstanding.

p.2

Information about this inspection

◼ This inspection was carried out by three of His Majesty’s Inspectors. ◼ Inspectors met with the director of the SCITT and other members of the leadership team, including the primary and secondary phase leaders. The lead inspector met with four representatives of the SCITT’s strategic steering group, including the chief executive officer. ◼ Inspectors reviewed a broad range of information relating to the ITE curriculum. This included training materials, documents relating to the assessment of trainees, course handbooks and curriculum plans. ◼ Inspectors examined a wide range of documentation concerning the leadership and management of the SCITT. This included information about governance, safeguarding arrangements and the recruitment of trainees. ◼ Inspectors spoke with 27 current trainees and nine former trainees from both the primary and secondary age-phases. ◼ Inspectors carried out focused reviews in biology and English in the secondary

p.2

Information about this inspection

phase and reading, mathematics and history in the primary phase. ◼ Inspectors made visits to eight schools to meet with trainees, mentors, school lead mentors and headteachers. These visits included short observations of trainees’ teaching.

p.2

better?

Trainees benefit from an ambitious and well-designed curriculum. The course content and sequencing ensure connectivity between subjects, phases, centre-based studies and placement experiences. Leaders have carefully identified the key learning that trainees need to learn and when. Leaders ensure that this is then woven through the curriculum in meaningful ways. For example, trainees learn about the importance of behaviour management, how to apply this in general and then how to apply specific techniques in subject- and phase-specific ways. This ensures that trainees revisit this key learning over the course and successfully build their skills and expertise over time.

p.3

better?

Leaders work closely with members of the partnership schools to develop a curriculum that is responsive to the needs of the locality. For example, the programme covers supporting pupils who speak English as an additional language at length. Elements such as this are fully integrated into the central educational programme to build the trainees’ knowledge in a way that not only meets but goes beyond, the core content framework.

p.3

better?

The ITE curriculum prioritises the development of primary trainees’ understanding of systematic synthetic phonics. Trainees cover this from the very beginning of both the undergraduate and PGCE pathways. This includes reading relevant research papers and completing a range of tasks to deepen their knowledge. For example, they draft terminology glossaries and complete comparisons of different systematic synthetic phonics programmes. In addition, they practise their own pronunciation of phonemes and review a range of phonics resources. Secondary trainees are also taught about the importance of systematic synthetic phonics and supporting reading in secondary schools.

p.3

better?

Trainees benefit from at least two contrasting school placements. In addition to this, all trainees experience the opportunity to visit alternative key stages, a special school and a pupil referral unit. These varying opportunities allow the trainees to build an extensive understanding of the different types of educational provision. This helps the trainees to learn about and see adaptive teaching practice in action.

p.3

better?

The provider has high expectations of mentors. All mentors receive high-quality training both on the course content and how to support the trainees effectively. Mentors have a clear understanding of their responsibilities, and they fulfil their duties well. However, the systems to quality assure mentors are not fully embedded. This means that course leaders are not fully aware of the quality of the trainees’ mentors, which means aspects such as target setting are not as consistent or strong as they could be. That said, mentors are overwhelmingly positive about the training and support they receive.

p.3

better?

The systems for assessing the trainees’ progress are suitably rigorous. Leaders gather a broad range of appropriate formative information over time to support these judgements. Trainees are clear about the expectations and timings of assessments from the start of the course. Leaders have ensured that assessment processes, while rigorous, are not overburdensome. This helps trainees to manage their workload well. Trainees are exceptionally well supported towards securing their first teaching post, resulting in very high employment rates. In addition to this, leaders support trainees with understanding other aspects of the roles. For example, trainees are taught about staffroom etiquette, making phone calls to parents and budgeting their wages.

p.3

(Information for the provider and appropriate authority)

◼ The systems for the quality assurance of mentors are not fully embedded. This means that on some occasions, trainees do not consistently benefit from high-quality advice and target setting. Leaders should further improve quality assurance processes to develop the mentors’ expertise.

p.4

comply with the ITE compliance criteria?

The provider meets the DfE statutory compliance criteria.

p.4

ITE provider details

This inspection was carried out in accordance with the initial teacher education inspection framework and handbook , which sets out the statutory basis and framework for initial teacher education (ITE) inspections in England from September 2020.

p.5

ITE provider details

Type of ITE provider School-centred initial teacher training Phases provided Primary and secondary combined Date of previous inspection 30 April and 22 October 2018

p.5

Inspection team

Eve Morris, Lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector

p.5

Inspection team

Jonathan Leonard His Majesty’s Inspector

p.5

Annex: Placement schools

Inspectors visited the following schools as part of this inspection:

p.6

Name URN ITE phases

Hagley Primary School 116678 Primary Clent Parochial Primary School 116796 Primary Hurst Green Primary School 103807 Primary Netherton C of E Primary School 103807 Primary Sutton Park Primary 146749 Primary Leasowes High School 143582 Secondary Pedmore High School 145593 Secondary Haybridge High School 136898 Secondary guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.6

Name URN ITE phases

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-

p.7

Name URN ITE phases

government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

Name URN ITE phases

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

Name URN ITE phases

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion