Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
Byron Court Primary School
Summary
Luke Stubbles (lead), Alison Martin, Georgina Herry, Samantha Ingram, Sarah Murphy
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
29 Nov 2023
- Inspectors verified
Alison Martin, Georgina Herry, Luke Stubbles, Samantha Ingram, Sarah Murphy
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Inadequate
- Early years verified
Inadequate
- Leadership and management verified
Inadequate
- Overall effectiveness verified
Inadequate
- Personal development verified
Inadequate
- Quality of education verified
Inadequate
- Postcode verified
HA0 3SF
- Name on report verified
Byron Court Primary School
- URN verified
101497
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2012.
- OverallInadequate
- Behaviour and attitudesInadequate
- Early yearsInadequate
- Leadership and managementInadequate
- Personal developmentInadequate
- Quality of educationInadequate
3% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (5,043 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The school’s response to serious behaviour incidents is often inconsistent and ineffective. p.2
- Behaviour policies are poorly understood and inconsistently applied. p.2
- Approaches to identifying and meeting pupils’ needs are inconsistent, and often weak. p.3
- Incidents of poor behaviour are not addressed consistently. p.3
- The structures in place to identify pupils with SEND and to support their learning are weak. p.2
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Nevertheless, some aspects of the school’s approach to early reading are not as effective as they need to be. p.4
- The school must review its policies and practices. p.4
- The school should prioritise making sure that suitable leadership arrangements are in place, so that the areas in need p.4
- Staff should receive suitable training and guidance, so that they can put the revised policies and procedures into practice. p.5
- The school should evaluate the current PSHE curriculum and put in place a curriculum that fully supports pupils’ development. p.5
- Staff will need thorough training to deliver the new curriculum, and the school should monitor the success of this. p.5
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance17
“The school lacks the necessary leadership capacity to improve.” p.2Records & policies6
“Behaviour policies are poorly understood and inconsistently applied.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 8
- Words of findings
- 1,784
- about usual (typical 1552)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 48, typical 53
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 6
- typical 6
- Hedged sentences
- 9%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Byron Court Primary School Spencer Road, Wembley, Middlesex HA0 3SF
p.1
Inspection dates: 28 and 29 November 2023
p.1
Overall effectiveness Inadequate
The quality of education Inadequate Behaviour and attitudes Inadequate Personal development Inadequate Leadership and management Inadequate Early years provision Inadequate Previous inspection grade Outstanding
p.1
Overall effectiveness Inadequate
This school was last inspected under section 5 of the Education Act 2005 11 years ago and judged ‘Outstanding’ under a previous inspection framework. This reflected the school’s overall effectiveness under the inspection framework in use at the time.
p.1
Overall effectiveness Inadequate
From then until November 2020, the school was exempted by law from routine inspection, so there has been a longer gap than usual between graded inspections under section 5 of the Act. Judgements in this report are based on the current inspection framework and also reflect changes that may have happened at any point since the last graded inspection. 28 and 29 November 2023
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Since the previous inspection, significant changes in leadership have left the school with insufficient capacity to run effectively. Leadership is overwhelmed. Too much responsibility is held by too few people. This has led to a marked deterioration in all aspects of the school’s work. Areas that need urgent improvement, including the school’s work to promote good behaviour, have been left unaddressed for too long. As a result, pupils are not receiving an acceptable standard of education.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
While the curriculum offered is broad and planned with ambition, the school has not made sure that it is implemented well. This is especially the case for pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). These pupils’ learning is given too little attention. The structures in place to identify pupils with SEND and to support their learning are weak. Often, their needs are not identified and met. This leads to pupils with SEND not making progress through the curriculum.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
The school has not done enough to ensure that pupils behave well. Behaviour policies are poorly understood and inconsistently applied. This means that pupils’ behaviour and attitudes have significantly declined over time. In some lessons, pupils disrupt their own learning and that of others. Breaktimes are chaotic, even when they are being managed by many members of staff. The school’s response to serious behaviour incidents is often inconsistent and ineffective. Some pupils, and some parents and carers, have concerns about bullying or behaviour. They feel that when these occur, things are not dealt with well and, consequently, continue.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
The school offers many enrichment activities, such as karate and cooking. These are planned successfully to help to broaden pupils’ wider experiences. However, the planning and delivery of personal, social and health education (PSHE) are not as successful at helping pupils to develop into respectful and well-rounded citizens. The use of racist language has been normalised, and too few steps are being taken to address this.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Interim leadership has prioritised ensuring that pupils are kept safe. This work has been effective. Suitable arrangements are in place to identify and help those pupils who may be vulnerable to harm.
p.2
better?
The school lacks the necessary leadership capacity to improve. Turbulence in leadership has not been managed well. This has led to a sharp decline in standards in all aspects of school life. The interim leadership team is trying to make things better for pupils and reverse this deterioration. However, it has become overloaded by the scale and amount of work needed, leaving it with too little time and capacity to focus on bringing about the necessary improvements.
p.2
better?
The governing body recognises the need to secure further leadership capacity and stabilise the school. For example, it has recently tried to boost leadership capacity by 28 and 29 November 2023
p.2
3
securing the help of external consultants. It is also in the process of seconding experienced leadership from another school. Despite this, too much is expected of the current arrangements for interim leadership. Significant issues in school remain either unidentified or unaddressed. They are not being tackled with sufficient urgency and rigour. As a result, pupils, particularly those with SEND, are not receiving a good-enough education. Some parents have lost confidence in the school, and in the provision and expectations for their children.
p.3
3
The school has a written behaviour policy. However, the lack of leadership capacity has meant that this policy is often not understood or followed. This leaves pupils unsure of what is expected of them. Incidents of poor behaviour are not addressed consistently. Actions taken in response to similar behaviour issues vary widely. Responses to bullying incidents are also inconsistent and, as a result, some pupils are worried about it. Other serious cases of misbehaviour, including racist language and sexual harassment, are not thoroughly dealt with or followed up.
p.3
3
The school has put in place a PSHE curriculum which covers topics such as first aid and online safety. However, the school has not checked how well the curriculum is working in practice. Teachers have not received sufficient guidance on how to teach subject content and make the curriculum meaningful and relevant to the school’s context. As a result, the curriculum is not effective in supporting the school’s aim to promote pupils’ wider development. For example, the school is not doing enough to ensure that pupils celebrate equality and diversity, and show respect for each other. Pupils throughout the school use racist language casually, as part of their day-to-day conversations. Incidents of homophobic behaviour are not adequately addressed.
p.3
3
Pupils like being able to take part in the range of clubs on offer as well as valuable enrichment activities, such as educational outings. The school is also working on further developing the opportunities for pupil leadership, where pupils take on roles such as global champions and digital ambassadors.
p.3
3
From early years to Year 6, the school does not consistently support pupils with SEND to know and remember more. Approaches to identifying and meeting pupils’ needs are inconsistent, and often weak. This means that some pupils who need additional support and adaptations do not receive them. Staff lack clear and sufficient guidance on how to support pupils with SEND. In some cases, pupils with the most complex needs are supported by the staff with the least expertise. This means that their needs remain unmet, and they are not learning well.
p.3
3
The school has taken a number of steps to address curriculum deficiencies. For example, new curriculum planning has been put in place for many subjects from early years to Year 6. However, reduced leadership capacity has severely hampered the school’s work to make sure that teachers fully receive the support they need to implement the curriculum well. Therefore, pupils have a varied experience of learning and are often not able to build on previous knowledge. Pupils’ outcomes in national assessments demonstrate the neglect that the curriculum has had over recent years. 28 and 29 November 2023
p.3
4
Leaders prioritise reading from the beginning of Reception. The school launched a new phonics scheme last academic year. Staff received training and have ongoing access to guidance materials to help them to further refine their teaching. Overall, the recent improvements made to early reading mean that pupils are supported to build their reading fluency over time. Any gaps in pupils’ knowledge are identified through regular assessments, with extra support put in place to address the things that pupils are struggling with. Nevertheless, some aspects of the school’s approach to early reading are not as effective as they need to be. While most pupils’ reading books match their stage of phonics learning, they also take home books to practise with that are not decodable. This can confuse pupils. In addition, in some instances, staff’s subject knowledge in how to teach phonics is not secure, and this affects how
p.4
4
well they support pupils’ development as readers.
p.4
4
Staff are supportive of the interim leadership arrangements and are keen to work with leaders at all levels to bring about improvements. They were especially positive about the support they are offered with their well-being.
p.4
4
The school works successfully with parents to improve pupils’ attendance.
p.4
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.4
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
Some pupils with SEND are not identified or supported promptly or effectively. This means that they do not learn and remember the intended curriculum. The school should increase its capacity to identify and plan effective provision for these pupils. All staff should receive further training so that they have the expertise needed to understand and meet pupils’ needs, including making appropriate adaptations to help pupils to learn well. There is insufficient leadership capacity to fully identify and implement the changes which are needed to improve pupils’ education and wider experiences of school life. This includes making sure that the curriculum in all subjects is taught well and enables pupils to achieve successfully. This means that pupils are not currently receiving an acceptable education. The school should prioritise making sure that suitable leadership arrangements are in place, so that the areas in need
p.4
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
of improvement can be identified and addressed urgently and that these improvements can be maintained over time. The school does not have clearly defined and understood behaviour policies that are applied consistently. This means that behaviour causes disruption to learning in lessons. Pupils regularly use discriminatory language, and bullying is not dealt with effectively. The school must review its policies and practices. It should ensure that staff understand and apply agreed approaches to securing good behaviour, including using rewards and consequences, consistently and fairly. 28 and 29 November 2023
p.4
5
Staff should receive suitable training and guidance, so that they can put the revised policies and procedures into practice. Pupils are not currently receiving a consistent and carefully planned PSHE curriculum. This has led to many instances where pupils do not celebrate equality and diversity. For instance, many pupils use racist language freely. The school should evaluate the current PSHE curriculum and put in place a curriculum that fully supports pupils’ development. Staff will need thorough training to deliver the new curriculum, and the school should monitor the success of this.
p.5
How can I feed back my views?
or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.5
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.5
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.5
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 28 and 29 November 2023
p.5
School details
Appropriate authority The governing body
p.6
School details
Dates of previous inspection 22 and 23 March 2012, under section 5 of the Education Act 2005
p.6
Information about this school
The school is currently being led by an acting headteacher, who has been in post since September 2023. The substantive headteacher was absent from the school during this inspection. The headteacher and the governing body have changed since the last inspection. Since the last inspection, the school has increased to five forms per year group. Leaders use one unregistered alternative provision.
p.6
Information about this inspection
The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.6
Information about this inspection
In accordance with section 44(1) of the Education Act 2005, His Majesty’s Chief Inspector is of the opinion that this school requires special measures because it is failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the persons responsible for leading, managing or governing the school are not demonstrating the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school. 28 and 29 November 2023
p.6
7
Inspections are a point-in-time judgement about the quality of a school’s education provision. This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school. The inspectors met with the headteacher and other senior leaders. They held discussions with representatives of the local authority and members of the governing body, including the chair of governors. The inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: early reading, history, mathematics, physical education and science. The inspectors discussed the curriculum with leaders, visited lessons, reviewed pupils’ work, met with pupils to discuss their learning and met with subject leaders and teachers. The inspectors also considered the curriculum in other subjects. To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the inspectors: reviewed the single
p.7
7
central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first. The inspectors spoke to pupils during lesson visits. They observed pupils’ behaviour in lessons and at breaktimes and lunchtimes. The inspectors spoke to staff about behaviour and about their workload in the school. The inspectors considered responses to Ofsted’s online surveys for parents, pupils and staff.
p.7
Inspection team
Luke Stubbles, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector
p.7
Inspection team
Sarah Murphy His Majesty’s Inspector 28 and 29 November 2023
p.7
8
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.8
8
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.8
8
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.8
8
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.8
8
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.8
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion