Schools & FE · School monitoring visit
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Matthew Fearns-Davies
- Postcode verified
S21 2EA
- Name on report verified
Killamarsh Junior School This letter sets out the findings from the monitoring inspection that took place on 25
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- This letter sets out the findings from the monitoring inspection that took place on 25 January 2024, on behalf of His Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills. p.1
- The monitoring inspection was carried out under section 8(2) of the Education Act 2005 and took place because the school has received two successive judgements of requires improvement at its previous graded (section 5) inspections. p.1
- The purpose of a monitoring inspection is not to grade the school’s overall effectiveness, but to identify and report on the school’s progress. p.1
- It is to highlight to the school and parents any improvements that school leaders have made since the school’s previous graded inspection. p.1
- During the inspection, I discussed with you and other senior leaders, governors, the local authority and members of staff the actions that have been taken to improve the school since the most recent graded inspection. p.1
- We discussed the ongoing impact of the COVID- 19 pandemic. p.1
- I also met with groups of pupils, visited lessons, observed pupils during social times and discussed the school’s safeguarding arrangements. p.1
- I have considered all this in coming to my judgement. p.1
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Teaching & assessment4
“The current headteacher was seconded to the role in November 2023.” p.1Communication & language4
“At the previous inspection, inspectors found that some pupils used derogatory language.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 1,005
- shorter than usual (typical 1570)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 51, typical 47
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 12%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.1
Ian Smith Head of School Killamarsh Junior School 38 Sheffield Road Killamarsh Sheffield South Yorkshire S21 2EA
p.1
Requires improvement monitoring inspection of Killamarsh Junior School
This letter sets out the findings from the monitoring inspection that took place on 25 January 2024, on behalf of His Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills. The monitoring inspection was carried out under section 8(2) of the Education Act 2005 and took place because the school has received two successive judgements of requires improvement at its previous graded (section 5) inspections.
p.1
Requires improvement monitoring inspection of Killamarsh Junior School
The purpose of a monitoring inspection is not to grade the school’s overall effectiveness, but to identify and report on the school’s progress. It is to highlight to the school and parents any improvements that school leaders have made since the school’s previous graded inspection.
p.1
Requires improvement monitoring inspection of Killamarsh Junior School
During the inspection, I discussed with you and other senior leaders, governors, the local authority and members of staff the actions that have been taken to improve the school since the most recent graded inspection. We discussed the ongoing impact of the COVID- 19 pandemic. I also met with groups of pupils, visited lessons, observed pupils during social times and discussed the school’s safeguarding arrangements. I have considered all this in coming to my judgement.
p.1
Leaders have made progress to improve the school, but more work is
necessary for the school to become good.
p.1
Main findings
Since the time of the previous inspection, there have been significant changes to the leadership of the school. The current headteacher was seconded to the role in November 2023. An additional member of the senior leadership team took up their post in January 2024 with responsibility for overseeing pupils’ attendance. The school is scheduled to become an academy and to join a multi-academy trust in August 2024.
p.1
Main findings
The school has prioritised reading. Following the previous inspection, swift action was taken to introduce a phonics scheme that matches pupils’ needs. All staff have completed training about how to teach pupils to read. Those pupils who access the phonics programme, including pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND), improve the accuracy and fluency of their reading. They read books matched to their reading ability. The school has also developed an ambitious reading curriculum for all pupils. The books that pupils read throughout their time at school include engaging fiction and non-fiction texts as well as poetry. Pupils say they enjoy reading. They can name the books and authors they have read with their teachers.
p.2
Main findings
The school has introduced a new curriculum. This curriculum sets out in each subject precisely which knowledge and skills should be taught and when. Staff say that this has resulted in a greater focus on teaching subject-specific concepts. They appreciate the consistency with which subjects are now being taught to all pupils. Pupils are able to share some of their learning in relation to styles of writing in English and to Inuit art in their art and design lessons. The changes to the curriculum have enabled subject leaders to improve their knowledge of the subjects they lead and of how their curriculums are sequenced. However, subject leaders are yet to develop consistently effective oversight of their subject areas. This is in part due to the recent and significant changes to the curriculum followed by the introduction of a new assessment system. The school is aware that developing subject leaders’ knowledge of their roles as well as their confidence to
p.2
Main findings
execute them to a consistently high standard remains a priority.
p.2
Main findings
Pupils with SEND benefit from personalised strategies that help them to feel comfortable in classrooms and learn the curriculum alongside their peers. More recently, staff have completed initial training about how to set personalised targets for pupils with SEND. The precision of these targets has improved since the time of the last inspection. However, the quality of target setting is not yet consistent. Some targets lack the information required to enable staff to help pupils with SEND take the next step in achieving their long-term personal and educational goals.
p.2
Main findings
Current and previous leaders have acted to address the school’s priorities. The pace of change has recently accelerated. This acceleration was necessary for the school to improve the quality of education that pupils access. The senior leadership team has expanded to increase capacity to address the school’s priorities, particularly in relation to attendance. There has been an increase in the time given to the oversight of the provision for pupils with SEND. Governors hold leaders to account, including more recently over the work to improve pupils’ attendance.
p.2
Main findings
At the previous inspection, inspectors found that some pupils used derogatory language. Pupils learn about respecting and celebrating difference. For example, a programme of assemblies focused on protected characteristics has been delivered. The school has also introduced a sequence of lessons designed to help pupils understand and communicate about their own and others’ emotions. Pupils now read books that cover a more diverse range of characters and themes. This work is having a positive impact. Younger pupils say that they do not hear derogatory language. Older pupils say that they hear inappropriate language occasionally from a very small number of pupils but that the frequency with which they hear it has reduced. Pupils shared that they value their learning about feelings. They said that a new understanding of how to identify and talk about their emotions is helping them inside and outside school. Regarding behaviour in general,
p.2
Main findings
pupils say there can be some disruption to their lessons.
p.3
Main findings
Most pupils’ attendance is improving. The proportion of pupils who are persistently absent has reduced. However, some of the most vulnerable pupils do not attend well enough. A range of strategies, including whole-class and individual rewards, is in place to encourage pupils to attend. The school does not yet analyse the causes of absence with sufficient rigour. However, leaders have begun to address this.
p.3
Main findings
I am copying this letter to the chair of the board of governors, the Department for Education’s regional director and the director of children’s services for Derbyshire. This letter will be published on the Ofsted reports website.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion