Early years · Early years inspection (EIF)
The Wittering's Village Pre - School
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
3 Jan 2024
- Inspectors verified
Nicole Atkinson
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Inadequate
- Leadership and management verified
Inadequate
- Overall effectiveness verified
Inadequate
- Personal development verified
Inadequate
- Previous overall verified
Good
- Quality of education verified
Inadequate
- Postcode verified
PO20 8PS
- Name on report verified
The Wittering's Village Pre - School
- URN verified
2502036
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2021.
- OverallInadequate
- Behaviour and attitudesInadequate
- Leadership and managementInadequate
- Personal developmentInadequate
- Quality of educationInadequate
5% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (17,905 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- 3 January 2024 devise and implement an ambitious and challenging curriculum that supports every child's learning and development, to ensure all children make good progress. 24/01/2024 p.4
- For example, children enjoy playing together in the home corner, caring for the dolls. p.3
- Parents talk positively about the pre-school and say that their children are happy to attend. p.3
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- They are unclear about the intentions for activities they are providing, and they do not always know what areas of learning activities promote. p.2
- Children with SEND are not always well supported. p.3
- Weaknesses in safeguarding mean that children's safety is not assured. p.2
- In addition, the quality of education children receive is weak. p.2
- Furthermore, staff fail to provide babies with quality interactions. p.2
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The provider has not ensured that staff have the knowledge and skills they need to support children's development. p.2
- As a result, children, including those in receipt of funding, do not develop the skills they need to prepare them for future p.2
- For instance, activities do not meet children's individual needs to support them to make progress with speech and language. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
SEND & inclusion6
“Children with SEND are not always well supported.” p.3Teaching & assessment6
“Furthermore, staff fail to provide babies with quality interactions.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 8
- Words of findings
- 1,044
- about usual (typical 972)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 53, typical 51
- Average sentence
- 15 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 1
- Hedged sentences
- 17%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of The Wittering's Village Pre - School St. Annes Church, Church Road, East Wittering, Chichester, Sussex PO20 8PS
p.1
Overall effectiveness Inadequate
The quality of education Inadequate Behaviour and attitudes Inadequate Personal development Inadequate Leadership and management Inadequate Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Good
p.1
The provision is inadequate
Weaknesses in safeguarding mean that children's safety is not assured. The provider has not ensured that staff have a secure knowledge or understanding of safeguarding. This does not keep children safe or protect their well-being. In addition, the quality of education children receive is weak.
p.2
The provision is inadequate
The provider has not recognised weaknesses in teaching or the content and delivery of the curriculum. For instance, staff do not plan purposeful activities to challenge or extend children's learning. They are unclear about the intentions for activities they are providing, and they do not always know what areas of learning activities promote. Therefore, children lose interest, lack understanding and are not engaged in their play. For example, at times, older children wander around the room disengaged. Furthermore, staff fail to provide babies with quality interactions. This has a detrimental impact on the progress children make.
p.2
The provision is inadequate
Children's behaviour is variable. For instance, they take turns when using the bicycles and scooters in the garden. However, children do not develop attitudes to learning to support them to make the progress of which they are capable. For example, staff do not notice when, at times, children become bored and boisterous when playing with the toys. Children are not consistently receiving the teaching from staff to support their learning and development.
p.2
The provision is inadequate
Overall, children are happy to arrive and seek out staff for comfort when needed. However, key-person arrangements in place are not effective to meet children's individual needs. For instance, babies, as well as children with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND), are not cared for by consistent key persons. At times, they become unsettled, and their emotional security is not supported. This does not promote the children's personal, social and emotional development.
p.2
need to do better?
n The provider does not ensure that all staff complete relevant safeguarding training. Although some staff have completed training, the provider has not identified or addressed continued weaknesses in staff's safeguarding knowledge. For example, they have not ensured that all staff have a secure understanding of how to make a referral about a child or report an allegation against a member of staff. In addition, staff do not consistently have the knowledge required to identify safeguarding issues, such as 'Prevent' duty and county lines. This compromises children's safety. n Supervision, coaching and mentoring of staff are not effective. The provider does not model or provide targeted support to help staff to improve their practice. Staff complete some online training to support their professional
p.2
need to do better?
3 January 2024 development and have supervision sessions with the provider. However, this does not identify and address weaknesses in the teaching and practice of staff. Therefore, although staff receive some training, it is not targeted to help them improve their practice and the quality of education for children. This has an impact on the quality of teaching and learning, which impacts the progress children make. n The provider has not established a well-structured curriculum that meets the needs of the children. For instance, there is a lack of clear intentions for children's learning. The provider has not ensured that staff have the knowledge and skills they need to support children's development. Therefore, children do not benefit from purposeful or challenging experiences that move them on to their next stage in their learning. As a result, children, including those in receipt of funding, do not develop the skills they need to prepare them for future
p.2
need to do better?
learning. n Children with SEND are not always well supported. For example, some staff sit with the children with SEND and offer no interaction at all. Although the provider is knowledgeable about the needs of the children with SEND, they do not support staff to understand how to adapt activities and ensure all children can access the curriculum. For instance, activities do not meet children's individual needs to support them to make progress with speech and language. Children with SEND do not get the support they require and, consequently, do not make the progress of which they are capable. n Children behave well most of the time. They play well together and are interested in what others are doing. For example, children enjoy playing together in the home corner, caring for the dolls. Staff encourage children to use good manners during their play and daily routines. For instance, at snack time, children wait patiently for their turn to choose their healthy snack. However,
p.3
need to do better?
some staff do not address incidents of unwanted behaviour. For example, at mealtimes, some children get up from the table and walk around eating food, while others climb under the table. Staff ignore this behaviour. Inconsistent attempts to manage children's behaviour do not support children to learn right from wrong. n All children are assigned a key person. However, this is not consistently shared with parents. Furthermore, key persons do not know and understand their key children's development and learning needs. This means that children's learning is not securely supported. n Parents talk positively about the pre-school and say that their children are happy to attend. However, the provider fails to share children's learning and development with them consistently. This means that parents are not aware of their children's next steps in learning. This does not enable them to support their child's learning at home.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective.
p.3
Safeguarding
There is not an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts children's
p.3
Due date
ensure that staff have a secure knowledge and understanding of safeguarding matters 24/01/2024
p.4
Due date
improve monitoring and supervision arrangements to ensure the support staff need is identified and that they receive tailored training, coaching and mentoring to enable them to implement consistently good practice that raises the quality of teaching 24/01/2024
p.4
Due date
make sure that there are appropriate arrangements to support children with SEND 24/01/2024
p.4
Due date
ensure that staff provide consistent and appropriate methods to manage children's behaviour and to help children understand what is expected of them 24/01/2024
p.4
Due date
ensure that parents know who their child's key person is and are well informed about the progress their child is making and how they can support their learning at home. 24/01/2024
p.4
Due date
3 January 2024 devise and implement an ambitious and challenging curriculum that supports every child's learning and development, to ensure all children make good progress. 24/01/2024
p.4
Setting details
Unique reference number 2502036 Local authority West Sussex Inspection number 10324694 Type of provision Childcare on non-domestic premises
p.6
Registers
Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register, Voluntary Childcare Register Day care type Full day care
p.6
inspection
Total number of places 30 Number of children on roll 37 Name of registered person The Wittering's Village Pre-School Ltd
p.6
reference number
Telephone number 07715239522 Date of previous inspection 17 September 2021
p.6
Information about this early years setting
Witterings pre-school registered in 2018. It operates from St Anne's Church Hall, Witterings, West Sussex. The pre-school opens Monday to Friday, from 7.15am to 3pm. The pre-school provides funded early education for two-, three- and four- year-old children. The pre-school employs 14 staff, four of whom are qualified in early years at level 3.
p.6
Inspection activities
n This was the first routine inspection the provider received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. The inspector discussed the impact of the pandemic with the provider and has taken that into account in their evaluation of the provider. n The provider and inspector completed a learning walk together of all areas of the setting and discussed the early years curriculum. n Children spoke with the inspector during the inspection. n The inspector talked to staff at appropriate times during the inspection and took account of their views. n The provider, who is also the special educational needs coordinator, spoke to the inspector about how they support children with SEND. n The inspector observed the quality of education being provided, indoors and outdoors, and assessed the impact that this was having on children's learning. n The inspector carried out a joint observation of a physical activity with the provider.
p.7
Inspection activities
n The inspector spoke to several parents during the inspection and took account of their views. n The provider showed the inspector documentation to demonstrate the suitability of staff.
p.7
Inspection activities
We carried out this inspection under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children's learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.
p.7
Inspection activities
3 January 2024 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
Inspection activities
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.8
Inspection activities
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk
p.8
Inspection activities
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.8
Inspection activities
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.8
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion