Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)
Children's Home run by Surrey County Council in Surrey
Summary
Skye Frain (lead), Karen Flanagan de Martinez
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Group verified
Surrey County Council
- Inspection date verified
7 Dec 2023
- Inspectors AI-checked
Karen Flanagan de Martinez, Skye Frain
- Helped and protected verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Name on report verified
SC068827
- URN verified
SC068827
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2023.
- OverallGood
- Helped and protectedGood
- Leadership and managementGood
70% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (12,716 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The registered person must notify HMCI and each other relevant person without delay if— p.5
- The registered person should ensure that staff are familiar with the home’s policies on record-keeping and understand the importance of careful, objective, and clear recording. p.5
- Information about the child must always be recorded in a way that will be helpful to the child. p.5
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance7
“Staff feel very well supported by the management team and state that staff morale is high.” p.4Records & policies6
“Some language used in the records has not always been child friendly.” p.4Teaching & assessment3
“Interactions between children and staff are kind-hearted and nurturing.” p.3Progress & outcomes3
“One child has made particularly strong progress in this area.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,019
- shorter than usual (typical 1319)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 51, typical 51
- Average sentence
- 13 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 5%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection report for children’s home: SC068827 1 SC068827 Registered provider: Surrey County Council Full inspection Inspected under the social care common inspection framework
p.1
Information about this children’s home
The home is operated by a local authority and provides care for up to four children with social, behavioural, and emotional difficulties.
p.1
Information about this children’s home
The suitably qualified manager has been registered with Ofsted since July 2022.
p.1
Overall experiences and progress of
children and young people, taking into account
p.1
good
How well children and young people are helped and protected good
p.1
good
The effectiveness of leaders and managers good
p.1
good
The children’s home provides effective services that meet the requirements for good.
p.1
good
Overall judgement at last inspection: good
p.1
good
Enforcement action since last inspection: none Inspection report for children’s home: SC068827 2
p.1
Inspection date Inspection type Inspection judgement
07/03/2023 Full Good 05/12/2022 Full Inadequate 25/08/2021 Full Good 22/08/2019 Full Good Inspection report for children’s home: SC068827 3
p.2
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Children have positive relationships with staff. Interactions between children and staff are kind-hearted and nurturing. One child identified particular members of staff who they trust and have built good relationships with.
p.3
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Discussions between staff and children are well planned, restorative, and reflective. These conversations are a strength of the home. Staff are proactively invested in supporting children to achieve positive outcomes.
p.3
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Children are making progress from their starting points. The children are enrolled in and attending education provisions. One child has made particularly strong progress in this area. They now engage in education and have aspirations to complete an apprenticeship. The staff team work collaboratively with education professionals to support children in achieving their goals.
p.3
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
The staff work closely with partner professionals. They describe staff as ‘communicative’ and ‘transparent’ in their approach. These professionals are positive about the care and support the staff provide the children with. Consequently, the home promotes a sense of collaborative working to meet the needs of the children.
p.3
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Staff support children who are due to move on to independence, at their own pace. Staff involve the children in the preparation of these plans from moving on. For example, staff support them in learning how to use public transport and make health appointments. As a result, children know their plans for moving on to independence, and are positive about this.
p.3
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
Staff safeguarding practice is good. During an unsettled period in the home, some children made allegations against staff. Senior leaders managed these allegations appropriately. Children’s views are taken seriously and prioritised. Safeguarding policies and procedures are followed, and actions taken are well documented. Professionals, staff and the local authority designated officer raised no concerns regarding the safeguarding practice of the staff.
p.3
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
Staff understand and manage the risks to children well. The staff are helped to understand risk through individualised risk assessments for each child. Staff update these risk assessments to ensure that they reflect the current needs and required support for the child. Staff are aware of, and review, new information to reflect the changes in need.
p.3
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
Staff use a variety of de-escalation strategies to prevent the use of physical intervention. As a result, physical restraint is rarely used in the home. When restraint has been used, it has been as a last resort. Restorative work with children around Inspection report for children’s home: SC068827 4 the use of restraint is reflective and child focused. The manager plans to further support staff confidence through additional physical intervention training.
p.3
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
Staff work closely with the children to promote the development of positive peer relationships. These relationships are closely monitored and tracked by the staff team. This monitoring enables staff to have targeted conversations with children to support them. While there continues to be some challenge with dynamics in the group, incidents have significantly decreased due to staff’s support.
p.4
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
The manager has clear monitoring processes in place to ensure that staff are recruited only once all suitability checks have been carried out. This reduces the risk of unsuitable people working with children.
p.4
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
Two significant incidents have occurred, which the manager did not inform Ofsted about. As a result, Ofsted, as the regulator, has not had full oversight of the home and any actions that have been taken to keep children safe.
p.4
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
The registered manager knows the children and staff well. She was previously the deputy manager and has worked at the home since it was registered. She is accessible to both children and staff.
p.4
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
Staff feel very well supported by the management team and state that staff morale is high. One staff member said that they could not ask for a ‘better management team’. Staff supervisions are consistently undertaken to a good standard, with children and safeguarding routinely discussed.
p.4
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
Managers and leaders understand the strengths and areas for development in the home. The manager undertook a detailed learning review following two children moving out in an unplanned way. New procedures have been implemented specifically around children moving in to the home as a result. This has had a positive effect, with a more-settled home.
p.4
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
There is an emphasis on staff training and development in the home to enable staff to meet the needs of the children. All staff are either up to date or booked to complete core training.
p.4
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
The quality of record-keeping is variable. Some information from significant incidents is missing or not clearly recorded. Some language used in the records has not always been child friendly.
p.4
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
The staff team is diverse, and children are supported to express their cultural and spiritual needs. One child is supported to engage in online worship with their former place of worship. Opportunities for personal prayer, as appropriate, are promoted by staff in the home. This encouragement supports children to grow into confident and open adults. Inspection report for children’s home: SC068827 5
p.4
Statutory requirements
This section sets out the actions that the registered person(s) must take to meet the Care Standards Act 2000, Children’s Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the ‘Guide to the Children’s Homes Regulations, including the quality standards’. The registered person(s) must comply within the given timescales.
p.5
Requirement Due date
The registered person must notify HMCI and each other relevant person without delay if—
p.5
Requirement Due date
an incident requiring police involvement occurs in relation to a child which the registered person considers serious. (Regulation 40 (4)(b)) 29 January 2024
p.5
Recommendations
The registered person should ensure that staff are familiar with the home’s policies on record-keeping and understand the importance of careful, objective, and clear recording. Information about the child must always be recorded in a way that will be helpful to the child. (‘Guide to the Children’s Homes Regulations, including the quality standards’, page 62, paragraph 14.4)
p.5
Information about this inspection
Inspectors have looked closely at the experiences and progress of children and young people, using the social care common inspection framework. This inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service, how it meets the core functions of the service as set out in legislation, and to consider how well it complies with the Children’s Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the ‘Guide to the Children’s Homes Regulations, including the quality standards’. Inspection report for children’s home: SC068827 6
p.5
Children’s home details
Registered provider address: Quadrant Court, 35 Guildford Road, Woking, Surrey GU22 7QQ
p.6
Inspectors
Karen Flanagan de Martinez, Social Care Inspector Skye Frain, Social Care Inspector Inspection report for children’s home: SC068827 7 to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.6
Inspectors
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
Inspectors
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
Inspectors
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion