Early years · Early years compliance action
More Play More Often Community Interest Company
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
25 Jan 2024
- URN verified
EY483107
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- In relation to the new areas of concern, as well as the previous actions that the provider had not met, on 5 April 2023 we served another welfare requirements notice. p.1
- The overall effectiveness of the provision was judged to be inadequate. p.1
- However, the provider had failed to implement staff supervision. p.1
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- We aim to ensure that the welfare of children and young people is protected in the services we regulate. p.2
- The Childcare Act 2006 and accompanying regulations set out our responsibilities to regulate childminders and childcare providers. p.2
- This includes the enforcement powers we have in relation to those registered providers who do not comply with the requirements for registration. p.2
- We publish details of any actions we take, or the childminder or childcare provider takes to bring about compliance with requirements on our website for a period of five years. p.2
- For further information please read the Early years compliance handbook which can be found here at www.gov.uk/government/publications/early-years-provider-non-compliance- action-by-ofsted . p.2
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Staff development3
“However, the provider had failed to implement staff supervision.” p.1
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 710
- longer than usual (typical 317)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 40, typical 35
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 5
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 8%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Summary of outcome
All early years providers must meet the legal requirements in the Statutory framework for the early years foundation stage, which you can find at www.gov.uk/government/publications/early-years-foundation-stage-framework--2. If we find that a provider is not meeting the requirements, we can take action to ensure they put matters right.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 23 February 2023, we carried out an inspection and found the provider was not meeting some of these requirements. The overall effectiveness of the provision was judged to be inadequate. The inspection report sets out the actions the provider was required to take to meet the requirements. We also served a welfare requirements notice. This is a legal notice that requires the provider to take the actions below within the timescales set out. The provider will be able to give parents further information about this.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 22 March 2023, we carried out a regulatory visit. The focus of the visit was to check whether the provider had met the safeguarding and welfare actions raised at their last inspection. We found the provider had met some of the safeguarding and welfare actions but not others.
p.1
Summary of outcome
The provider had made improvements to the premises, including to ensure there are a sufficient number of working toilets. They had improved risk assessment procedures to minimise risks to children. Additionally, the manager had supported staff to understand good hygiene practices. These actions had improved some aspects of the promotion of children's good health and their safety. However, the provider had failed to implement staff supervision. Staff did not understand how to promote positive behaviour or support children with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). They did not demonstrate a secure understanding of child protection. Furthermore, leaders had not ensured that a named deputy was in place.
p.1
Summary of outcome
Additionally, during the regulatory visit on 22 March 2023, we found new areas of concern. This means that the provider was not meeting other requirements as set out in the Statutory framework for the early years foundation stage. In relation to the new areas of concern, as well as the previous actions that the provider had not met, on 5 April 2023 we served another welfare requirements notice.
p.1
Summary of outcome
n ensure that staff provide children with clear and consistent messages about their behaviour ensure that staff have a secure understanding of how to meet the needs of children with special educational needs and/or disabilities
p.1
Summary of outcome
n ensure that staff are aware of the local safeguarding referral procedures and have a secure understanding of safeguarding issues
p.2
Summary of outcome
n ensure that there are appropriate arrangements in place for the supervision of staff who have contact with children and staff receive coaching, guidance, and support to foster a culture of continuous improvement
p.2
Summary of outcome
n ensure that links with external professionals and other settings children also attend are in place
p.2
Summary of outcome
n ensure there is a named deputy who is capable and qualified to take charge in the managers absence.
p.2
Summary of outcome
On 18 April 2023, we carried out a further regulatory visit to check whether the provider had met the safeguarding and welfare actions raised. We found that the provider had improved their knowledge and understanding of child protection procedures and now fully understands their responsibilities. The provider has made links with other professionals to support children with SEND. We found that staff use consistent behaviour management approaches and appropriate supervision arrangements have been put in place for staff to help them understand their roles and responsibilities. A named deputy, who in the provider's judgement is capable and qualified, is now in place to take charge in the manager's absence. We are satisfied the provider has met the safeguarding and welfare actions raised.
p.2
Summary of outcome
The provider is still registered with Ofsted.
p.2
Publication of compliance action
We aim to ensure that the welfare of children and young people is protected in the services we regulate. The Childcare Act 2006 and accompanying regulations set out our responsibilities to regulate childminders and childcare providers. This includes the enforcement powers we have in relation to those registered providers who do not comply with the requirements for registration.
p.2
Publication of compliance action
We publish details of any actions we take, or the childminder or childcare provider takes to bring about compliance with requirements on our website for a period of five years.
p.2
Publication of compliance action
For further information please read the Early years compliance handbook which can be found here at www.gov.uk/government/publications/early-years-provider-non-compliance- action-by-ofsted .
p.2
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion