Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected — · published 10 Feb 2023

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

David Deane (lead), Jo Olsson

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    David Deane, Jo Olsson

  • Postcode verified

    WA7 6QN

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−8Mixedmore positive than 11% of reports of this type

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Praiseexceptionallypositivevery wellsafeeffectivewarmcaringimproved
Criticismconcernsseriousharmweaknessespoordecliningconcernmissed

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1304w−7
  • What needs to improve121w−20

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,422
longer than usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 47, typical 48
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
6
typical 2
Hedged sentences
10%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 92%What needs to improve 8%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Julie Barron Headteacher St Berteline’s CofE Primary School Norton Lane Norton Runcorn Cheshire WA7 6QN

p.1

Urgent inspection of St Berteline’s CofE Primary School

Following my visit with David Deane, Ofsted Inspector, to your school on 14 and 15 December 2022, I write on behalf of His Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and the time you took to discuss your school.

p.1

Urgent inspection of St Berteline’s CofE Primary School

This inspection was conducted under section 8 of the Education Act 2005 and in accordance with Ofsted’s published procedures for urgent inspections. The inspection was carried out because His Majesty’s Chief Inspector wished to determine the effectiveness of safeguarding arrangements, leadership and management (including governance) and pupils’ behaviour and attitudes at the school, as concerns had been raised with Ofsted.

p.1

Urgent inspection of St Berteline’s CofE Primary School

We do not give graded judgements on urgent inspections. However, if we find some evidence that overall standards may be declining, but where no serious concerns have been identified, then the next inspection will normally be a graded inspection, which will be carried out under section 5 of the Act and be brought forward. If we have serious concerns, we will deem the urgent inspection as a graded inspection immediately.

p.1

Evidence

We scrutinised the single central record and other documents relating to safeguarding and child protection arrangements. We met with you and other leaders. We held discussions with teaching and non-teaching staff, different groups of pupils, parents and carers and a representative from the local authority. We also spoke with members of the governing body, including the chair of governors. We observed pupils at work and at play by visiting classrooms, watching their arrival into the school building in the morning and observing their behaviour during breaktimes and lunchtimes. We reviewed the curriculum for pupils’ personal, social, health and economic (PSHE) education and the provision for pupils’ relationships and health education. We took account of the views shared by parents via Ofsted Parent View.

p.1

Evidence

Having considered the evidence, I am of the opinion that at this time:

p.2

Main Findings

The systems for keeping pupils safe from harm are effective. There is a positive culture of safeguarding within the school that is based on warm and caring relationships, up-to-date training and a collective understanding that safeguarding is everyone’s responsibility.

p.2

Main Findings

Staff understand their role in keeping pupils safe. They are alert to any changes in pupils’ behaviour, or physical appearance, which might indicate that pupils are suffering from harm. The most recent safeguarding training means that all staff and governors are well informed about the variety of risks that could have a negative impact on pupils’ welfare, including peer-on-peer abuse and harmful sexual behaviours. Staff share and escalate concerns about individual pupils appropriately. This is so that you and other leaders can secure the timely help and support that vulnerable pupils and their families may need. When necessary, you continue to lobby for this support if it is not forthcoming, or you seek other solutions. For example, you commission a school counsellor to support pupils’ mental and emotional health.

p.2

Main Findings

You and the governors have recently improved the recording of safeguarding concerns. Even so, some weaknesses remain. At times, these records do not contain sufficient detail, nor are they linked closely enough to the records about pupils’ poor behaviour, including bullying. This hinders your ability, and that of governors, to gain a comprehensive overview of concerns and issues with ease and speed. There is the potential to miss minor isolated incidents, recorded in different forms, that together could lead to a more serious concern.

p.2

Main Findings

Governors are kept abreast of safeguarding matters through their meetings, visits to school and the reports that they receive. They ensure that the school’s policies meet statutory requirements. Following a recent incident at the school, they have been proactive in reviewing some of their systems, especially around record-keeping. Still, governors’ oversight of behaviour and safeguarding is not as sharp as it could be. On occasions, they do not ask sufficiently probing questions or carry out their checks on leaders’ work with sufficient rigour.

p.2

Main Findings

Without exception, the different groups of pupils who spoke with inspectors, including those with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND), said that they feel safe at school. They have absolute trust in the staff. Pupils have been helped to understand the importance of sharing their worries. They know the side-effects of keeping concerns to themselves. The convincing examples that pupils shared with us demonstrate that they are confident that staff will deal with any concerns effectively and sensitively. School records show that staff and leaders deal with incidents of bullying efficiently.

p.2

Main Findings

Helping pupils to keep themselves safe and healthy is a cornerstone of the PSHE and relationships and health education curriculums. From an early age, children in the Reception class learn about friendship and respecting the personal space and bodies of others. This builds over time, so that by the end of Year 6, pupils gain a wealth of knowledge about healthy relationships, sexual consent and how to protect themselves from unwanted attention and harmful sexual behaviour. Pupils particularly enjoy the Year 5 residential visit which arms them with the strategies to deal with some of the risks that they may face in their day-to-day lives. Following any incidents of unkindness, or other safeguarding issues, teachers often add extra PSHE sessions into the daily timetable to ensure that pupils are better informed of the potential impact of their actions. For example, older pupils have spent additional time considering the effect of their words on

p.3

Main Findings

others when they share their opinions via technology.

p.3

Main Findings

The PSHE curriculum consists of many carefully chosen programmes to ensure that pupils are ready for life in modern Britain. Nonetheless, the curriculum itself is not as cohesive as it should be. It does not provide enough guidance to teachers about what must be taught and when this should happen. This makes it too easy for essential subject content to be missed across a year group or as pupils move from class to class.

p.3

Main Findings

Pupils are full of praise for their school. They are very happy and exceptionally proud to belong to its community. They behave very well from the start to the end of the day. They enter the building in a calm manner, follow routines and settle down to their work without any fuss or attempts to distract themselves or others. Despite the very cold weather, and the fact they had not been able to take a break outdoors for a number of days, their behaviour did not falter during the inspection. Those pupils who find managing their own behaviour a challenge are supported well through a range of successful strategies. This means that pupils calm down quickly and do not lose valuable learning time. Pupils attend school regularly. Very few pupils are frequently absent from school.

p.3

Main Findings

Pupils believe that the behaviour of others is good most of the time. They recognise that everyone makes mistakes from time to time, but they are equally willing to forgive and forget. Pupils appreciate the differences between people. They are slow to criticise, and quick to celebrate success. The school pantomime, which included every pupil from key stage 2, epitomised pupils’ respectful behaviour and positive attitudes to school life.

p.3

Additional support

You appreciate the safeguarding network meetings that are organised by the local authority. You attend these meetings on a regular basis to ensure that your knowledge is up to date and to learn from the good practice in other local schools. You have made good use of the support provided by the local authority’s safeguarding leader in recent months to deal with some pressing concerns. This has led you, and the governors, to commission a local authority officer to visit the school in the near future to support you in improving safeguarding systems further.

p.3

Priorities for further improvement

 Improve the system for recording and evaluating safeguarding incidents. This is so that written records are sufficiently detailed, and greater account is taken of the information that is held separately, about pupils’ behaviour and bullying.  Ensure that the PSHE curriculum identifies the essential subject knowledge that pupils must learn, and when this should be taught, so that nothing is left to chance.  Increase the rigour of governors’ oversight of safeguarding and pupils’ behaviour.

p.4

Priorities for further improvement

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the director of education for the Diocese of Chester, the Department for Education’s regional director and the director of children’s services for Halton. This letter will be published on the Ofsted reports website.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion