Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

St Mary's Catholic Primary School

Inspected 29 Nov 2023 · published 19 Jan 2024 · URN 149316

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    29 Nov 2023

  • Inspectors verified

    Karen O’Keefe, Wayne Simner

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Good

  • Early years verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Quality of education verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    B80 7QU

  • Name on report verified

    St Mary’s Catholic Primary School

  • URN verified

    149316

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallGood
  • Behaviour and attitudesGood
  • Early yearsGood
  • Leadership and managementGood
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Quality of educationGood

66% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (5,043 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+85Very positivemore positive than 93% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseexceptionallylovehigh expectationsenjoypositivestrongpolitecaring
Criticismlimitednot consistently

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1305w+85
  • Safeguarding6w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,288
about usual (typical 1098)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 54, typical 55
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
3
typical 4
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 68%Safeguarding 0%About the inspection 31%

Full report text

Inspection of St Mary’s Catholic Primary School Pool Road, Studley, Warwickshire B80 7QU

p.1

Inspection dates: 28 and 29 November 2023

p.1

Overall effectiveness Good

The quality of education Good Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Good Early years provision Good

p.1

Overall effectiveness Good

Previous inspection grade Not previously inspected under section 5 of the Education Act 2005

p.1

Overall effectiveness Good

The headteacher of this school is Owen Finnegan. This school is part of Our Lady of the Magnificat Multi-Academy Company, which means other people in the trust also have responsibility for running the school. The trust is run by the Catholic senior executive leader, Tom Leverage, and overseen by a board of directors, chaired by Yvonne Brennan.

p.1

Overall effectiveness Good

Ofsted has not previously inspected St Mary’s Catholic Primary School as an academy under section 5 of the Education Act 2005 as, until November 2020, the school was exempted by law from routine inspection, so there has been a longer gap than usual between inspections. Judgements in this report are based on the current inspection framework and also reflect changes that may have happened at any point since the last graded inspection of the predecessor school. 28 and 29 November 2023

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

This is a school with a family feel. Staff know the pupils really well. There is a strong sense of pastoral care, which parents and carers value immensely. The school has high expectations for every pupil and support them to be the best they can be.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Leaders at all levels, supported by staff, are constantly striving to improve the quality of education that pupils experience. There is also a focus on developing the ‘whole child’ to prepare pupils for life after St Mary’s. The school has established links with the local community, which gives pupils a sense of belonging in their local area.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils are exceptionally polite. They greet visitors with a smile and make them feel welcome. Pupils get along with each other. There is a calm atmosphere around the school and lots of laughter. In most instances, pupils listen well and focus on their work. On the playground, pupils enjoy playing with their friends, working out on the exercise equipment, or simply having a chat.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Parents are overwhelmingly positive about the school. They value the information that the school shares with them about their children. In addition, they appreciate the visibility and caring nature of staff.

p.2

better?

In the early years, positive relationships exist between staff and the children. Staff plan lots of enjoyable activities to support children’s learning. However, in some areas of learning, the school has not mapped out the knowledge, skills and vocabulary that children will learn in the early years.

p.2

better?

The school has considered carefully what pupils will learn in a wide range of subjects. In many subjects, the curriculum clearly sets out the knowledge and skills that pupils will learn within and across year groups. As a result, teachers are clear about what to teach and when to teach it. However, in a small number of subjects, the school has not considered how the curriculum in Year 1 builds on what pupils have learned previously in the early years.

p.2

better?

Reading is a high priority in the school. The school is working hard to foster a love of reading through the English curriculum, regular storytimes and a well-stocked, inviting library. The teaching of phonics is well ordered and builds pupils’ phonics knowledge over time. Staff teach phonics effectively because they have been trained well. If needed, staff give pupils extra help so that they do not fall behind.

p.2

better?

Teachers have secure subject knowledge in a range of curriculum areas. As a result, they explain new learning in a clear and well-structured manner. Teachers and teaching assistants model subject-specific language accurately, which pupils are themselves using when explaining their own understanding. However, teachers are 28 and 29 November 2023

p.2

3

not routinely making checks on pupils’ learning to identify any misconceptions. In addition, some learning activities are too easy, and some are too difficult.

p.3

3

The school identifies the needs of pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) accurately. Pupils with SEND are fully included in lessons and all aspects of school life. When required, staff provide extra support and additional resources to help pupils complete learning activities.

p.3

3

Pupils are exceptionally proud of their school. They speak confidently about the school’s motto, ‘Love to Learn and Learn to Love’. Pupils say the motto reminds them to be kind to everyone and to help each other. The school has forged links with the local community. For example, pupils sing songs at the nearby care home and they have adopted four war graves, which they look after and maintain. Pupils know about the different types of families that exist in their local community.. They speak positively about the popular after-school sporting clubs and the range of trips that they get to experience, including regular visits to the local forest. Pupils are very knowledgeable about online safety and the risks associated with the internet. However, their knowledge of different faiths and cultures is more limited.

p.3

3

School leaders, the multi-academy company and the local governing body work well as a team. Together, they keep a close eye on the quality of education and wider provision for the pupils in their care. However, they are not complacent and are always looking for further ways to make the school even better.

p.3

3

Staff enjoy working in the school and they wear the St Mary’s badge with pride. They value the range of training they have received, such as the recent safeguarding training. Staff say that workload is manageable and school leaders do all they can to keep it at a reasonable level. Staff comment that leaders are always at hand to listen and provide help if needed. Staff describe school leaders as their ‘champions’.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 In some areas of learning, the early years curriculum does not set out the knowledge, skills and vocabulary that children will learn over time. Consequently, some learning activities do not fit into a well-ordered sequence of learning. The school should sequentially map out the knowledge, skills and vocabulary that children will learn in all areas of learning in the early years.  In a small number of subjects, the school has not considered how the curriculum in Year 1 builds on what pupils have learned in the early years. This slows pupils’ learning. The school should ensure that in all subjects, the curriculum in Year 1 builds on and links to what pupils have learned in the early years. 28 and 29 November 2023

p.3

4

 The school is not using formative assessment consistently well to identify pupils’ misconceptions and ensure that learning activities are matched to pupils’ needs. As a result, misconceptions are not being routinely addressed and work set can be too easy or too difficult. The school should ensure that staff use formative assessment consistently well to identify pupil misconceptions and to inform the selection of learning activities.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 28 and 29 November 2023

p.4

School details

Appropriate authority Board of directors

p.5

School details

Date of previous inspection Not previously inspected

p.5

Information about this school

 The school has a breakfast club and an after-school club. This provision is operated by an external provider.  The school is part of the Catholic Archdiocese of Birmingham. The school received its most recent Section 48 Catholic Schools Inspection in November 2022.  The school does not use any alternative provision.

p.5

Information about this inspection

The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.5

Information about this inspection

 Inspections are a point-in-time judgement about the quality of a school’s education provision.  This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken this into account in their evaluation. 28 and 29 November 2023

p.5

6

 To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the inspectors reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first.  The lead inspector met with the headteacher, five representatives of the multi- academy company and the chair of the local governing body. The lead inspector also held a telephone conversation with a representative of the diocese.  Inspectors held meetings with a range of leaders to discuss provision for pupils with SEND, pupils’ behaviour, attendance, the early years, personal development and additional funding.  Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: early reading, mathematics, history, and design and technology. For each deep dive, inspectors held discussions about the curriculum, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers,

p.6

6

spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work.  The lead inspector observed pupils reading to a familiar adult.  Inspectors spoke to groups of pupils formally and informally about their learning and experiences at school. Two separate groups of pupils accompanied inspectors on personal development learning walks around the school.  Inspectors considered responses to Ofsted Parent View, and the free-text responses received during the inspection. Inspectors considered the responses to Ofsted’s staff survey.  Inspectors looked at a range of documentation. This included the school’s positional statement, school policies, curriculum documents, SEND records, behaviour records, attendance records and minutes of meetings held by the local governing body.

p.6

Inspection team

Wayne Simner, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

Karen O’Keefe Ofsted Inspector 28 and 29 November 2023

p.6

7

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion