Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Lowe's Wong Infant School

Inspected 30 Nov 2023 · published 19 Jan 2024 · URN 145642

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Requires improvement

Caroline Poole (lead), Peter Johnston, Sally Manz

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    30 Nov 2023

  • Inspectors verified

    Caroline Poole, Peter Johnston, Sally Manz

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Requires improvement

  • Early years verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Quality of education verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    NG25 0AA

  • Name on report verified

    Lowe's Wong Infant School

  • URN verified

    145642

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Behaviour and attitudesRequires improvement
  • Early yearsGood
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Quality of educationRequires improvement

15% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (5,043 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−19Mixedmore positive than 9% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseenjoyeffectivelywell designedlovehappypositivericheffective
Criticismnot consistentlynot alwaysunacceptablenot effectivepoornot clearnot successfullynot clearly

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1150w−22
  • Safeguarding6w+33
  • What needs to improve158w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,287
about usual (typical 1215)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 60, typical 56
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
6
typical 5
Hedged sentences
8%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 62%Safeguarding 0%What needs to improve 9%About the inspection 29%

Full report text

Inspection of Lowe's Wong Infant School Queen Street, Southwell, Nottinghamshire NG25 0AA

p.1

Inspection dates: 29 and 30 November 2023

p.1

Overall effectiveness Requires improvement

The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Requires improvement Personal development Good Leadership and management Requires improvement Early years provision Good

p.1

Overall effectiveness Requires improvement

Previous inspection grade Not previously inspected under section 5 of the Education Act 2005

p.1

Overall effectiveness Requires improvement

The headteacher of this school is Aly Speed. The school is part of Minster Trust for Education, which means that other people in the trust also have responsibility for running the school. The trust is run by the chief executive officer, Matthew Parris, and overseen by a board of trustees, chaired by Nigel Turner.

p.1

Overall effectiveness Requires improvement

Ofsted has not previously inspected Lowe’s Wong Infant School as an academy under Section 5 of the Education Act 2005 as, until November 2020, the school was exempted by law from routine inspections. Judgements in this report are based on the current inspection framework and also reflect changes that may have happened at any point since the last graded inspection of the predecessor school. 29–30 November 2023

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Lowe’s Wong Infant School is at the heart of its local community. Pupils love the opportunities they have to represent their school. They are excited to sing at a local Christmas shopping event. They perform Maypole dances at community events. Pupils are chosen as ‘Bramley King’ and ‘Bramley Queen’ to celebrate the ‘Bramley Apple Festival’ held in the town.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

It is a happy school. The care that staff give to pupils is second to none. Parents appreciate how well their children are known. One parent said: ‘The staff always have the best interests of children at the heart of everything they do.’

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils agree that everyone is friendly in their school. At playtime and lunchtime, they get on well. They enjoy a wide range of well-organised games and activities. They look out for each other. Pupils know that if they are lonely, they can go to sit on the ‘friendship bench’ and that a playground buddy will help them to find someone to play with. The school has established three simple rules for behaviour in lessons, ‘good looking, good listening, good sitting.’ However, in some lessons some pupils do not stick to these rules.

p.2

better?

The reading, mathematics and early years curriculum is well designed. It sets out in sufficient detail what pupils should learn, and when. In these subjects, pupils remember important knowledge. Children in the early years consider the question, ‘What comes out at night?’ They name badgers, foxes and owls as animals that wait for the dark to appear. They use ‘nocturnal’ with confidence to describe these animals. Year 2 pupils talk about their understanding of place value in mathematics. They show resilience as they work. One pupil said: ‘What keeps me going is that I like mathematics. I am determined that I am going to finish all my work.’

p.2

better?

In other subjects across the wider curriculum this is not the case. In these subjects the school has not clearly identified the precise knowledge that pupils will learn. It is not consistently clear how new learning builds on prior learning. As a result, pupils do not acquire secure, ever increasing knowledge. The checks that the school makes to assure itself that pupils are learning well in these subjects are not effective. They do not help the school to identify the areas where further work is needed, or where staff may require additional support and guidance.

p.2

better?

The school has prioritised reading. Children in the early years start to learn the sounds they need to know to read and write without delay. Staff receive training to deliver the phonics programme effectively. They identify pupils who need more help to learn to read and make sure they receive additional support to keep up. Pupils are positive about reading. They chat about the books they enjoy including, ‘The Tale of Peter Rabbit’ and ‘Fantastic Mr Fox’. Each school day ends with a story time. Pupils listen well as their teachers read to them in a way that holds their interest. 29–30 November 2023

p.2

3

Pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) are identified early. There are plans in place to outline the support they will receive. Sometimes the adjustments that the school makes are not successfully removing the barriers that prevent them from learning as well as they can. In addition, because some pupils with SEND have unmet needs, their behaviour can impact on the learning of other pupils.

p.3

3

Pupils have rich and varied experiences beyond the curriculum. Pupils speak enthusiastically about the clubs they can join. These include science, tennis and girls’ football – ‘Little Lionesses’. Pupils have opportunities to go on trips to a local farm, a wildlife park and to Belvoir Castle. Year 2 pupils anticipate their annual residential trip. ‘Muddy Explorers’ in the school garden is a weekly event for children in the early years. The school council represent pupil voice. Older pupils talk with intelligence about equality. They cite Rosa Parks and Malala Yousafzai as examples of unacceptable discrimination.

p.3

3

The trust and the local governing body have worked closely with the school to identify school improvement priorities. While there is still significant work to be done, leaders demonstrate the ambition and capacity to make the improvements needed with the support of the trust.

p.3

3

Staff agree that the school has a team spirit. They say that the doors of senior leaders ‘are always open’. They enjoy working at the school and feel valued.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 In the foundation subjects the curriculum does not precisely identify the key knowledge that pupils need to know and remember. It is not clear how knowledge is built up layer by layer over time. The school must ensure that the small steps of learning that pupils need to make are clearly identified in every subject.  Some curriculum leaders do not have a clear overview of the subject they lead. They do not have a well-developed understanding of the work that needs to be done to improve their subject or where colleagues may require further support and guidance. The school must ensure that all subject leaders adequately monitor their subjects and effectively use this information to drive school improvement in the area which they lead.  The support that pupils with SEND receive does not consistently enable them to access the curriculum. Their needs are not always met and they do not learn as well as they could. The school must provide staff with the knowledge and skills

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

they need to adapt the curriculum so that pupils with SEND learn the intended curriculum as well as they can. 29–30 November 2023

p.3

4

 Behaviour is not consistently good across the school. Some lessons are disrupted by the poor behaviour of a fewpupils. This is not always well managed and can hinder the learning of some pupils. The school must ensure that all pupils keep to the school rules and give of their very best in lessons.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, 'disadvantaged pupils' is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school's pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 29–30 November 2023

p.4

School details

Local authority Nottinghamshire County Council

p.5

Headteacher

Date of previous inspection Not previously inspected

p.5

Information about this school

 The school joined the Minster Trust for Education in April 2021. When its predecessor school, also known as Lowe’s Wong Infant School, was last inspected by Ofsted in April 2009, it was judged to be outstanding overall.  The headteacher has been appointed since the previous inspection.  The school does not make use of any alternative provision.

p.5

Information about this inspection

The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.5

Information about this inspection

 Inspections are a point-in-time judgement about the quality of a school’s education provision. 29–30 November 2023

p.5

6

 This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school.  Inspectors held meetings with the headteacher and other senior leaders. The lead inspector met with the chair of governors and one other governor. A further meeting was held with four representatives of the trust, including the chief executive officer.  Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: early reading; mathematics; design and technology; and history. For each deep dive, inspectors held discussions about the curriculum, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work. An inspector listened to pupils reading to a member of staff.  Inspectors observed pupils’ behaviour during lessons, in assembly, around the

p.6

6

school and at social times.  To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the inspectors: reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first.  Inspectors spoke with staff, parents and pupils. They considered the responses to the staff survey and comments made by parents on Ofsted Parent View.

p.6

Inspection team

Caroline Poole, lead inspector His Majesty's Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

Sally Manz Ofsted Inspector 29–30 November 2023

p.6

7

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion