Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
Denholme Primary School
Summary
Jo Sharpe (lead), David Taylor
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
16 Nov 2023
- Inspectors verified
David Taylor, Jo Sharpe
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Good
- Early years verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Personal development verified
Good
- Quality of education verified
Good
- Postcode verified
BD13 4AY
- Name on report verified
Denholme Primary School
- URN verified
143567
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2019.
- OverallGood
- Behaviour and attitudesGood
- Early yearsGood
- Leadership and managementGood
- Personal developmentGood
- Quality of educationGood
66% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (5,043 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Class teachers think carefully about what support pupils with SEND need to enable them to learn alongside their peers. p.3
- Subject leaders and the special educational needs and disabilities coordinator (SENDCo) take the time to consider the blocks of knowledge that pupils need to help them understand what they are learning. p.3
- They know what needs to be done to improve the school further. p.3
- The impact of this is wide ranging and, ultimately, means some pupils do not grasp knowledge as securely as they should. p.3
- Senior leaders need to ensure that these leaders are provided with more opportunities for professional development and training. p.4
- Senior leaders also need to ensure that these leaders get the time to review and evaluate the implementation of the curriculums in the classroom. p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance16
“Where leaders have identified weaknesses, action has been taken.” p.2Communication & language4
“All staff consistently promote a wide range of useful vocabulary.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,250
- about usual (typical 1098)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 52, typical 55
- Average sentence
- 15 words
- Next steps
- 6
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 11%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Denholme Primary School Minorca Mount, Denholme, Bradford, West Yorkshire BD13 4AY
p.1
Inspection dates: 15 to 16 November 2023
p.1
Overall effectiveness Good
The quality of education Good Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Good Early years provision Good Previous inspection grade Requires improvement
p.1
Overall effectiveness Good
The headteacher of this school is Malcolm Campbell. This school is part of Nurture Academies Trust, which means other people in the trust also have responsibility for running the school. The trust is run by the chief executive officer, Wahid Zaman, and overseen by a board of trustees, chaired by Pamela Smith. 15 and 16 November 2023
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils like going to school. They speak proudly of the school moto ‘happy learners, high achievers’ and the ‘4Rs’, Readiness, Resilience, Reflection and Respect. The school takes great care to teach pupils about becoming valuable members of society. Pupils know what racist and homophobic language is. They say that sort of language and any form of bullying is not acceptable in their school.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
This is a very inclusive school. Pupils show great respect to new people they meet and their peers. Expectations are high in all aspects of school life. Pupils rise to meet these expectations. From Nursery to Year 6, pupils behave well and are eager to learn. Pupils achieve well.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Leaders have planned opportunities for pupils that go beyond the academic curriculum. Pupils enthusiastically recall the residential trips they take part in. They speak of responsibilities they have in school such as being lunch leaders. Some roles that pupils led previously have not been set up this academic year. Pupils say they would welcome the opportunity to take on more responsibilities in school. This means that opportunities to develop pupils’ skills of responsibility and leadership are being overlooked.
p.2
better?
The school makes sure that the curriculum gives pupils knowledge that will help them in their future lives. The curriculum is broad and is supplemented to develop pupils’ interests and talents. For example, each class has an allotment space where they grow vegetables to then use in school. Other pupils get the opportunity to play the guitar or learn karate. One of the school’s 4Rs, respect, is central to everything that happens in school. Pupils are taught about how we are all different, sometimes in how we look or how we behave, or because we have different beliefs. Difference in this school is accepted, welcomed and respected.
p.2
better?
The curriculum that pupils study is ambitious and builds steps of knowledge over time. For example, from Nursery to Year 6, teachers give children and pupils a wealth of opportunities to manipulate materials and learn techniques, and how to use them successfully. Consequently, the quality of art and design technology around the school is exceptional. Younger children make peg dolls. Year 1 pupils use everything they have learned since Nursery to make moon buggies.
p.2
better?
Leaders have prioritised the teaching of reading. Good routines have been established to help pupils learn phonics. Where leaders have identified weaknesses, action has been taken. For example, pupils now have three extra lessons a week to improve the fluency of their reading. The school is a text-rich environment. There is a well-stocked library and class book areas, which promote a love of reading. Teachers prioritise speaking and listening. All staff consistently promote a wide range of useful vocabulary. For example, adults in Nursery model positional language when asking children to sit next to them or opposite them. 15 and 16 November 2023
p.2
3
Pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) are well supported. Expectations are high for these pupils. Pupils who access The Orchard provision move between this class and the mainstream classes when it is right to do so. Class teachers think carefully about what support pupils with SEND need to enable them to learn alongside their peers. Physical resources to support learning are plentiful. Sometimes, the resources to help them access the academic curriculum are not always suitable. For example, pupils struggled to understand a two-dimensional map, when a globe may have made the learning easier to understand. School leaders know that a very small minority of parents express concern that the school is not meeting the needs of pupils with SEND.
p.3
3
Subject leaders and the special educational needs and disabilities coordinator (SENDCo) take the time to consider the blocks of knowledge that pupils need to help them understand what they are learning. They spend time considering work in books and speaking to pupils. They work closely with class teachers. However, they do not focus enough on pupils’ learning in the classroom. Therefore, some weaknesses are not identified, and occasionally learning is not as good as it could be. For example, in some classes, occasionally, repetition of prior learning is not clear. In others, learning is not broken down into small enough steps.
p.3
3
Senior leaders know their school well. Trustees, governors and senior leaders know the part they play in school improvement. They know the advantages and disadvantages of being a small school. They know what needs to be done to improve the school further. When areas of weakness are identified, such as reading fluency, action is taken to fully address and remedy them.
p.3
3
Staff feel very well supported by senior leaders. They speak of honest and respectful relationships where everyone is working together towards the same, shared vision. Parents speak positively about the work the school does. Parents say that this is ‘a great place, warm and friendly’ and that they are ‘forever grateful to all the amazing teachers’.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
Subject leaders and the SENDCo do not get enough opportunities to focus on the implementation of the curriculum. A small minority of them do not have the knowledge to be able to evaluate implementation effectively. Consequently, different and isolated areas for improvement are not being dealt with quickly enough. The impact of this is wide ranging and, ultimately, means some pupils do not grasp knowledge as securely as they should. For example, some pupils require knowledge to be in smaller steps, while others need more reinforcement of prior knowledge. Some pupils require more precise adaptations to be able to 15 and 16 November 2023
p.3
4
access learning. Senior leaders need to ensure that these leaders are provided with more opportunities for professional development and training. Senior leaders also need to ensure that these leaders get the time to review and evaluate the implementation of the curriculums in the classroom. The school has not reinstated some of the roles and responsibilities that pupils previously held. Pupils want to take on responsibilities and are disappointed that they currently have fewer opportunities to develop skills of responsibility and leadership. The school needs to consider different ways of developing leadership roles to help pupils further their personal development.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.4
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 15 and 16 November 2023
p.4
School details
Dates of previous inspection 12 and 13 November 2019, under section 5 of the Education Act 2005
p.5
Information about this school
The school is a part of the Nurture Academies Trust. The school has a resourced provision known as The Orchard. The Orchard caters for up to eight children with autism. The resourced provision is funded by Bradford local authority and managed by the school. The school does not use any alternative provision.
p.5
Information about this inspection
The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005. Inspections are a point-in-time judgement about the quality of a school’s education provision.
p.5
Information about this inspection
This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school. 15 and 16 November 2023
p.5
6
The headteacher was not present during the inspection. The inspection team met with the chief executive officer of the trust, the assistant headteacher and the deputy headteacher throughout the inspection. Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: reading, mathematics, history and geography. For each deep dive, inspectors held discussions about the curriculum, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work. To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the inspectors: reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff, pupils and parents; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interest first. Inspectors considered the views of parents and staff, including through responses to Ofsted’s surveys.
p.6
Inspection team
Jo Sharpe, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector
p.6
Inspection team
David Taylor Ofsted Inspector 15 and 16 November 2023
p.6
7
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
7
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
7
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
7
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
7
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion