Early years · Childminder inspection (EIF)
Jane Louise Sillett
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
23 Nov 2023
- Inspectors verified
Lyndsey Barwick
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Requires improvement
- Leadership and management verified
Inadequate
- Overall effectiveness verified
Inadequate
- Personal development verified
Inadequate
- Previous overall verified
Good
- Quality of education verified
Inadequate
- Name on report verified
Childminder report
- URN verified
EY299266
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2019.
- OverallInadequate
- Behaviour and attitudesRequires improvement
- Leadership and managementInadequate
- Personal developmentInadequate
- Quality of educationInadequate
5% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (17,905 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- She fails to implement a curriculum that is focused on children's needs and next steps in learning. p.2
- She fails to plan purposeful learning opportunities for children to help them build on what they already know and can do. p.2
- The childminder fails to recognise the importance of gathering this information before the children start. p.3
- The childminder fails to recognise the importance of partnership working. p.3
- The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective. p.3
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Communication & language7
“They are keen to talk to visitors, demonstrating they feel safe and secure in her home.” p.2Parents & families5
“Parents share positive feedback about the childminder.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 956
- about usual (typical 899)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 47, typical 51
- Average sentence
- 15 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 1
- Hedged sentences
- 5%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Overall effectiveness Inadequate
The quality of education Inadequate Behaviour and attitudes Requires improvement Personal development Inadequate Leadership and management Inadequate Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Good
p.1
The provision is inadequate
The childminder has insufficient knowledge and understanding of safeguarding children in relation to allegations about adults working with children and household members. She does not ensure that accurate attendance records are completed. The childminder does not have a secure enough understanding of when to make notifications to Ofsted. This compromises children's welfare.
p.2
The provision is inadequate
The childminder does not ensure that children receive the level of education to which they are entitled. They do not get appropriate stimulation in their play and learning. She fails to implement a curriculum that is focused on children's needs and next steps in learning. Activities provided are not planned with children's individual needs or development levels in mind. This limits the opportunities children have to make good progress in their learning.
p.2
The provision is inadequate
However, children appear confident and happy in the childminder's care. They are keen to talk to visitors, demonstrating they feel safe and secure in her home. Children happily engage in the activities that are offered to them. Generally, the children behave well. The childminder reminds them of the behaviour rules and the reasons behind them when required. The childminder is polite and kind towards the children. However, her interactions do not promote children's communication or thinking skills. This does not help all children reach their full potential.
p.2
need to do better?
n The childminder has not done enough to ensure that all requirements of the 'Statutory framework for the early years foundation stage' are met. For example, she does not know the ratio requirements she must adhere to. She is unable to meet the individual needs of all the children she cares for when she cares for more than three early years children at one time. This has an impact on the quality of education she provides. n The childminder does not have a secure understanding of how children develop and learn. This means she does not provide a curriculum that is suitably challenging or ambitious. She fails to plan purposeful learning opportunities for children to help them build on what they already know and can do. Children of all ages engage in the same activity at the same time with limited alternative activities on offer. Most resources are inaccessible to the children until placed on the floor or table by the childminder. This limits the opportunities children have
p.2
need to do better?
to engage in self-chosen play or play linked to their developmental needs. As a result, children are not making the best possible progress. n Interactions with children are basic and do not stimulate curiosity, interest or excitement. The childminder engages children in simple conversations and, occasionally, repeats back words, so they can hear the correct pronunciation.
p.2
need to do better?
23 November 2023 However, she does not challenge children's thinking or introduce new vocabulary. She only uses simple statements and asks children questions she knows they can answer easily. For example, she asks them about the shape and colour of items despite children already knowing their shapes and colours well. This does not encourage them to think deeply or develop their knowledge. This means children do not benefit from interactions that support their communication and language skills or extend their thinking. n For the children that have been attending the setting for some time, the childminder has gathered an extensive knowledge of their backgrounds and family needs. She offers support to the families. For example, she provides support to parents if they have temporary transport issues. However, when new children start, the childminder does not gather relevant information from parents before the child starts, for example information about their current development
p.2
need to do better?
and which languages they speak. The childminder fails to recognise the importance of gathering this information before the children start. n Parents share positive feedback about the childminder. She keeps them informed about their children's day. They report their children are happy and settled. However, effective systems are not yet in place to ensure that information is shared between the childminder and the other settings children attend. The childminder fails to recognise the importance of partnership working. This has an impact on the continuity of education and care for the children.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective.
p.3
Safeguarding
The childminder does not fulfil her responsibilities in relation to safeguarding children. She does not know the procedures to follow to respond to allegations about adults working with children or adults in the household. The childminder does not keep required records relating to children's attendance and their hours of arrival and departure. She does not have a secure enough understanding of when to make notifications to Ofsted. This compromises children's safety and welfare.
p.3
Due date
improve knowledge of the procedures to follow in the event of an allegation been made against the childminder or a household member 14/12/2023
p.3
Due date
23 November 2023 demonstrate how the individual needs of all children will be met and the exceptions to the usual ratios will be applied if caring for more than three children in the early years age range at any one time 14/12/2023
p.3
Due date
ensure accurate attendance records are maintained 14/12/2023
p.4
Due date
take action to improve knowledge of the notification requirements, ensuring that Ofsted is informed of any significant events 14/12/2023
p.4
Due date
undertake relevant professional development opportunities to improve knowledge and understanding of the learning and development requirements to aid the implementation of an ambitious curriculum that promotes the next steps in children's learning 14/12/2023
p.4
Due date
improve the quality of interactions, particularly to support children's thinking and communication skills 14/12/2023
p.4
Due date
improve arrangements to ensure all relevant information about children is gathered prior to their start date to ensure their learning and emotional needs are met as soon as they start, in particular for children who may speak English as an additional language 14/12/2023
p.4
Due date
enable a regular two-way flow of information with other settings that children attend, to strengthen the consistency in the support children receive. 14/12/2023
p.4
Setting details
Unique reference number EY299266 Local authority Essex Inspection number 10317483 Type of provision Childminder
p.5
Registers
Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register, Voluntary Childcare Register Day care type Childminder
p.5
inspection
Total number of places 6 Number of children on roll 5 Date of previous inspection 8 April 2019
p.5
Information about this early years setting
The childminder registered in 2005 and lives in Brentwood, Essex. She operates all year round from 7am to 5pm, Monday to Friday, except for bank holidays and family holidays. The childminder provides funded early education for two-, three- and four-year-old children.
p.5
Inspection activities
n This was the first routine inspection the provider received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. The inspector discussed the impact of the pandemic with the provider and has taken that into account in their evaluation of the provider. n The childminder and the inspector discussed how the childminder organises their early years provision, including the aims and rationale for their early years foundation stage curriculum. n Children communicated with the inspector during the inspection. n The inspector observed the quality of education being provided and assessed the impact that this was having on children's learning. n The inspector observed the interactions between the childminder and children. n Parents shared their views of the setting with the inspector.
p.5
Inspection activities
23 November 2023 We carried out this inspection under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children's learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.
p.5
Inspection activities
23 November 2023 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.6
Inspection activities
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
Inspection activities
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk
p.7
Inspection activities
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
Inspection activities
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion