Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected — · published 22 Dec 2023

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Gayle Bacon (lead), Christine Watkins, John Craig

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Christine Watkins, Gayle Bacon, John Craig

  • Postcode verified

    DN22 7NJ

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+23Mostly positivemore positive than 61% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisepositivestrongvery welltrusting relationshipssafewarmhappydelay
Criticismconcernsdecliningseriousstruggle

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
866
about usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 51, typical 48
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
0
typical 2
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Matthew Rooney Principal St Giles School Babworth Road Retford Nottinghamshire DN22 7NJ

p.1

Urgent inspection of St Giles School

Following my visit with Gayle Bacon, Ofsted Inspector, and John Craig, Ofsted Inspector, to the school on 21 November 2023, I write on behalf of His Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and the time you took to discuss the school.

p.1

Urgent inspection of St Giles School

This inspection was conducted under section 8 of the Education Act 2005 and in accordance with Ofsted’s published procedures for urgent inspections. The inspection was carried out because His Majesty’s Chief Inspector wished to determine the effectiveness of safeguarding arrangements and the use of physical intervention at the school as concerns had been raised with Ofsted.

p.1

Urgent inspection of St Giles School

We do not give graded judgements on urgent inspections. However, if we find some evidence that overall standards may be declining, but where no serious concerns have been identified, then the next inspection will normally be a graded inspection, which will be carried out under section 5 of the Act and be brought forward. If we have serious concerns, we will deem the urgent inspection as a graded inspection immediately.

p.1

Evidence

We held meetings with you and other senior leaders. I met with a member of the governing body, and with representatives of the local authority. We visited lessons in all areas of the school and spoke with pupils and members of the teaching and support staff teams. We observed pupils on arrival at school and during breaktimes and lunchtimes. We spoke to some parents and carers at the start of the day. We reviewed a wide range of documents. These included school policies, and records relating to staff training, behaviour incidents and the use of physical intervention. I scrutinised the single central record and other documents relating to safeguarding and child protection arrangements, including the findings from an external review of safeguarding.

p.1

Evidence

Having considered the evidence, I am of the opinion that at this time:

p.2

Main findings

The leadership team places a high priority on safeguarding. You have instilled a positive culture of safeguarding by providing a thorough induction and training for all staff and governors. You encourage staff to develop a sense of ‘professional curiosity’ in their approach to keeping children and young people safe. Staff are expected to act on their instincts if they sense that something has changed for a pupil. All concerns, however minor, are logged on the school’s safeguarding system without delay. Records show that leaders’ actions in response to concerns are prompt and appropriate. The school works in close partnership with a wide range of external professionals to support vulnerable young people.

p.2

Main findings

In discussion, teaching and support staff reported that they have received regular safeguarding training and updates. They commented that this training causes them to think deeply and reflect on their own practice. Staff express confidence in how to log concerns. They understand the pupils, and their needs, very well. For example, staff described how the school works with pupils and families to promote online safety.

p.2

Main findings

Positive, trusting relationships are evident throughout the school. In lessons, and during social times, there is ample adult supervision to ensure pupils’ safety and well-being.

p.2

Main findings

There are well-established arrangements and routines for managing pupils’ arrival at school. Staff have clearly identified roles and responsibilities to ensure that pupils transfer safely from their modes of transport into school. Pupils were observed entering school happily, enjoying a warm welcome and a positive start to the school day. Parents praised the care provided for their children, and the positive progress their children make.

p.2

Main findings

You have ensured that there are strong policies and systems in place for managing the use of physical intervention. These instances are infrequent, and only undertaken as a last resort to keep pupils safe. However, when the need arises, records show that well-trained staff follow the appropriate guidelines. You analyse incidents straight away and report any findings or patterns to governors. In recent years, you have continued to strengthen the emphasis on a positive approach to behaviour management. This has resulted in a reduction in the use of physical intervention over time. In all lessons and classes visited, and during social times, we noted a calm, happy and positive atmosphere throughout the school. A small number of pupils who struggle to remain regulated receive appropriate support to engage in learning.

p.2

Main findings

The governing body provides strong support and appropriate challenge for the school. Governors are proactive in checking for themselves the school’s arrangements for safeguarding, as well as receiving regular reports. They visit the school to speak to leaders, staff and pupils. Governors are committed to the welfare and well-being of pupils and of staff. They ensure that the appropriate procedures are embedded and followed.

p.3

Additional support

The school benefits from visits and support from the local authority. This includes, for example, professional discussion around the school’s long-term strategic plans for development and growth.

p.3

Additional support

I am copying this letter to the chair of the board of governors, the Department for Education’s regional director and the director of children’s services for Nottinghamshire County Council. This letter will be published on the Ofsted reports website.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion