Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School monitoring visit

Setting

Inspected —

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Stuart Voyce

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Stuart Voyce

  • Postcode verified

    NE3 3RU

  • Name on report verified

    Kenton School This letter sets out the findings from the monitoring inspection that took place on 16

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−6Mixedmore positive than 26% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseimprovedimprovingconsistentlyeffectivelypositiveclear
Criticismgapspoorrequires improvementdisruptionpersistently absenttoo manysuspensionsabsence

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings569w+2
  • What needs to improve218w−43

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
787
shorter than usual (typical 1570)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 51, typical 47
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
20%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 72%What needs to improve 28%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Sinead Green Principal Kenton School Drayton Road Newcastle-upon-Tyne Tyne and Wear NE3 3RU

p.1

Requires improvement monitoring inspection of Kenton School

This letter sets out the findings from the monitoring inspection that took place on 16 November 2023, on behalf of His Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills. The monitoring inspection was carried out under section 8(2) of the Education Act 2005 and took place because the school has received three judgements of requires improvement at its previous graded (section 5) inspections.

p.1

Requires improvement monitoring inspection of Kenton School

The purpose of a monitoring inspection is not to grade the school’s overall effectiveness, but to identify and report on the school’s progress. It is to highlight to the school and parents any improvements that school leaders have made since the school’s previous graded inspection.

p.1

Requires improvement monitoring inspection of Kenton School

During the inspection, I discussed with you, the chief executive officer (CEO), the executive principal and the chair of the local governing body and a trustee the actions that have been taken to improve the school since the most recent graded inspection. We discussed the ongoing impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. I also met with the curriculum leaders for English and humanities, visited lessons and looked at pupils’ work. I reviewed the single central record, discussed the culture of safeguarding across the school and analysed your school’s behaviour and attendance information. I have considered all of this in coming to my judgement.

p.1

Leaders have made progress to improve the school, but more work is

necessary for the school to become good.

p.1

Main findings

You were appointed as principal at Kenton School in March 2023. Since your appointment, the multi-academy trust has recruited a significant number of new staff, including an executive headteacher and several curriculum directors, to help support the school.

p.2

Main findings

Your school has prioritised improving the quality of education. This includes implementing new strategies to delivering the curriculum, such as a new lesson structure. Although teachers tend to employ these strategies consistently, some teachers use them more effectively than others.

p.2

Main findings

With the support of curriculum directors from the trust, leaders have improved the curriculum. This has led to improvements in published outcomes. In some stronger subjects, leaders have made refinements to the knowledge that they want pupils to learn. For example, in English, leaders have changed the order in which some topics are taught to help pupils connect new learning to previously taught content. However, there are some subjects where the curriculum has had to be completely redesigned. Some of these changes are still being embedded. In these subjects, there is more to do with the curriculum to ensure it will address gaps in pupils’ knowledge.

p.2

Main findings

Your school has secured significant improvements in pupils’ behaviour. Leaders have raised everyone’s expectations of pupils’ conduct. New behaviour systems have had a positive impact. Disruption to learning is minimised. Suspensions and removals from lessons have reduced dramatically compared to this time last year. Leaders have also thought carefully about the support for pupils who continue to show challenging behaviour. You and your leaders have established the new ‘Aspire’ provision to offer targeted support to further improve the behaviour of some pupils. One pupil told me that the Aspire provision had been ‘life changing’.

p.2

Main findings

Leaders use a range of strategies to promote good attendance. Pupils’ attendance has improved since the previous inspection. It remains that some pupils do not attend school often enough. The number of pupils who are persistently absent from school, although improved, is still too high. For some pupils, such as those with education, health and care plans, attendance has improved significantly. You, quite rightly, have identified pupils’ attendance as a key improvement area for the school. Senior leaders know that there is more to do to improve attendance. Visits to lessons show the impact of lost learning because of poor attendance. Too many pupils have gaps in their knowledge due to absence.

p.2

Main findings

The school has clear improvement plans to address the next steps identified in the previous inspection. This plan is monitored and evaluated by you, other leaders in school and by the trust. You have accessed support from another multi-academy trust to review systems for behaviour and attendance. You, and trust leaders, have ensured that the school is improving quickly. You are aware that there is more work to do in relation to pupils’ attendance and the quality of education in some subjects. The CEO, governors and trustees know the school well. They have ensured that the school has more stable staffing and are better supported by the growing infrastructure within the trust.

p.2

Main findings

I am copying this letter to the chair of the board of trustees and the CEO of Northern Leaders Trust, the Department for Education’s regional director and the director of children’s services for Newcastle. This letter will be published on the Ofsted reports website.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion