Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

St Mary's Catholic College, A Voluntary Academy

Inspected 5 Oct 2023 · URN 143554

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Requires improvement

Jenny Jones (lead), Geoff Baker, Paul Rigby, Scott Maclean

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    5 Oct 2023

  • Inspectors verified

    Geoff Baker, Jenny Jones, Paul Rigby, Scott Maclean

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Quality of education verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    CH45 3LN

  • Name on report verified

    St Mary’s Catholic College, A Voluntary Academy

  • URN verified

    143554

Page 1 of 8
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2019.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Behaviour and attitudesGood
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Quality of educationRequires improvement

15% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (5,043 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+10Mostly positivemore positive than 35% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectivestrongimprovedhigh expectationspositiveambitiouseffectivelyhappy
Criticismnot effectiveweaknessestoo manygapsnot high expectationstoo slownot robustnot secure

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1168w+8
  • Safeguarding6w+33
  • What needs to improve88w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
8
Words of findings
1,229
about usual (typical 1215)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 51, typical 56
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
9%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 60%Safeguarding 0%What needs to improve 5%About the inspection 35%

Full report text

Inspection of St Mary’s Catholic College, A Voluntary Academy Wallasey Village, Wallasey, Merseyside CH45 3LN

p.1

Overall effectiveness Requires improvement

The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Requires improvement Sixth-form provision Requires improvement Previous inspection grade Requires improvement

p.1

Overall effectiveness Requires improvement

The headteacher of this school is Kevin Maddocks. This school is part of Holy Family Catholic Multi Academy Trust, which means other people in the trust also have responsibility for running the school. The trust is run by the chief executive officer (CEO), Andrew Moor, and overseen by a board of trustees, chaired by Paul Simpson. 4 and 5 October 2023

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

The culture in this school has improved in recent years. The school now has high expectations of how pupils should behave. Pupils rise to these and conduct themselves well. In lessons, most pupils display positive attitudes to learning.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils, including students in the sixth form, benefit from strong pastoral support through ‘the hub’. This provision, alongside well-trained staff, helps a minority of pupils to reflect on their behaviour or emotions and then re-integrate quickly into lessons. The school deals with incidents of bullying swiftly and effectively. Pupils are happy and feel safe.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

The school has thought carefully about pupils’ wider development. Pupils are encouraged to pursue interests and talents through a range of activities, such as ukulele, Chinese and poetry clubs. They are especially proud of taking part in whole- school productions.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

The school does not have high expectations for pupils’ academic achievement. Progress in raising pupils’ achievement has been too slow. Consequently, pupils’ outcomes, including for pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) and those who are disadvantaged, are low. Pupils do not achieve as well as they could.

p.2

better?

Changes in leaders, of both the school and the trust, have improved pupils’ behaviour and created a climate in which pupils can learn. There is a consistent approach to managing behaviour across the school. In most lessons, pupils learn free from distraction. However, the school has not addressed the poor outcomes that too many pupils, including students in the sixth form, achieve.

p.2

better?

There is a broad and ambitious curriculum in place, including for pupils in the specially resourced provision, ‘The Arc’. In most subjects, the school has considered the important knowledge that pupils should learn. However, at all key stages there is a disconnect between the ambition of the curriculum and the way in which it is delivered. At times, teachers do not use the most effective activities to teach the intended curriculum. Some of the activity choices do not help pupils to remember important knowledge over time.

p.2

better?

In several subjects, the assessment methods that teachers use do not link securely to the curriculum. Furthermore, the school’s processes to check whether the curriculum is being delivered as intended are not robust. As a result, the school has not identified the precise weaknesses in terms of how the curriculum is delivered and how to remedy them.

p.2

better?

The school has taken effective action to prioritise reading across the curriculum. Staff use information about pupils’ reading abilities to adapt their teaching. Pupils 4 and 5 October 2023

p.2

3

who struggle with reading benefit from intensive support. Staff are well trained to be able to deliver the reading curriculum each day. Although pupils say that they enjoy the daily reading sessions in school, only a minority choose to read independently for pleasure.

p.3

3

Many pupils do not attend school regularly. This means that they miss out on learning the full curriculum. The school does not carefully analyse the reasons for pupils’ absence. The actions taken to improve pupils’ attendance rates have not been effective.

p.3

3

The school engages well with parents. For instance, it recently ran an information evening for parents and carers of Year 11 pupils about how to support them with their preparation for examinations.

p.3

3

The school has a strong moral purpose to ensure that pupils with SEND access and benefit from the same opportunities as their peers. It identifies pupils’ additional needs accurately. Pupils with SEND receive effective support. Nevertheless, weaknesses in how well the curriculum is delivered to all pupils prevent pupils with SEND from achieving as well as they could.

p.3

3

The school is committed to improving pupils’ wider development. There is a carefully constructed ‘Inspire’ programme, which broadens pupils’ interests, experiences and understanding of others. It is flexible to respond to any issues that arise. For instance, pupils recently learned about the impact of knife crime on victims’ families. The careers programme gives pupils access to local employers and prepares them well to make informed decisions about their next steps.

p.3

3

Staff feel that the school listens to their suggestions about well-being. For example, staff helped to design the assessment calendar, which helped to ensure that workload is spread out over the year. They are positive about the changes that have been made since the appointment of the headteacher. The trustees and governors are confident in the school’s capacity to improve. However, they have an over- generous view of the school’s strengths and weaknesses. They have not challenged the school sufficiently well to bring about the improvements needed in the quality of education that the school provides.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 In many subjects, teachers do not use appropriate pedagogical choices to deliver the curriculum. At times, these choices do not reflect the ambitious aims of the curriculum. Consequently, pupils do not secure a deep body of knowledge in 4 and 5 October 2023

p.3

4

these subjects. The school should enhance teachers’ pedagogical knowledge so that they can deliver the curriculum as intended.  The school’s systems for checking how well the curriculum is delivered are not effective. This means that trustees, governors and the school have an over- generous view of how well pupils learn. The trustees, governors and the school should ensure that there are effective systems in place to check the implementation of the curriculum.  In some subjects, assessment methods are not used effectively to check what pupils know and remember. This hinders teachers from identifying gaps and misconceptions in pupils’ knowledge. The school should continue to refine its approach to assessment in these subjects so that teachers can identify and address any gaps in knowledge.  Too many pupils and students in the sixth form are absent or persistently absent from school. The school does not systematically identify the barriers to

p.4

4

attendance that these pupils have. As a result, many pupils miss out on their education. The school should take all possible steps to improve pupils’ attendance.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, 'disadvantaged pupils' is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 4 and 5 October 2023

p.4

provision

Number of pupils on the school roll 1,133

p.5

sixth form

Dates of previous inspection 8 and 9 October 2019, under section 5 of the Education Act 2005

p.5

Information about this school

 The headteacher commenced his role in November 2021.  The school hosts a specially resourced provision on behalf of the local authority for up to 24 pupils with autism. There are currently 26 pupils from Year 7 to Year 11 who are part of this provision.  The school makes use of three unregistered alternative provisions for a small number of pupils.  The school runs an on-site alternative provision for a small number of pupils.  The school is part of the Diocese of Shrewsbury. The last section 48 inspection, for schools of a religious character, was carried out in 2016. The next inspection is scheduled to take place this academic year. 4 and 5 October 2023

p.5

6

 The school meets the requirements of the provider access legislation, which requires schools to provide pupils in Years 8 to 13 with information and engagement about approved technical education qualifications and apprenticeships.

p.6

Information about this inspection

The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.6

Information about this inspection

 Inspections are a point-in-time judgement about the quality of a school’s education provision.  This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school.  Inspectors met with the headteacher, other senior leaders, subject leaders and members of staff. The lead inspector met with the CEO of the trust, the chair of the trustees and members of the local governing body, including the vice-chair of governors.  The lead inspector held telephone conversations with a representative of the local authority and a representative of the diocese.  Inspectors carried out deep dives in English, geography, mathematics, science, French, and art and design. For each deep dive, inspectors held discussions about the curriculum, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some

p.6

Information about this inspection

pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work.  Inspectors also held discussions with other subject leaders.  To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the inspectors: reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first.  Inspectors scrutinised a range of documents, including the school’s self-evaluation document, school improvement plans, minutes of governor meetings and records of pupils’ behaviour and attendance.  Inspectors spoke to groups of pupils from Years 7 to 13 about their experience of school and their views on behaviour and bullying. Inspectors also observed pupils’ behaviour at breaktimes and lunchtimes.  Inspectors considered the responses to Ofsted Parent View, including the free-

p.6

Information about this inspection

text responses. There were no responses to Ofsted’s surveys for staff and pupils. 4 and 5 October 2023

p.6

Inspection team

Jenny Jones, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector

p.7

Inspection team

Paul Rigby Ofsted Inspector 4 and 5 October 2023

p.7

8

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.8

8

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.8

8

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.8

8

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.8

8

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.8

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion