Early years · Early years inspection (EIF, requirements met)
Progressive Childcare @ St Chad's Primary School
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Group verified
Progressive Childcare Ltd
- Group reference verified
RP903061
- Inspection date verified
20 Nov 2023
- Inspectors verified
Donna Birch
- Overall effectivenesssingle source
Not met
- Previous overall verified
Good
- Postcode verified
PR6 8LL
- Name on report verified
Progressive Childcare @ St Chad's Primary School
- URN verified
EY496774
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallNot met
10% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Not met (3,163 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Not met.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Longstanding members of staff express their concern that there has been a recent decline in standards. p.2
- For example, some new staff do not know what to do should they have a concern about the conduct of a colleague. p.3
- The weak oversite of the setting means that required documentation is not available for inspection. p.2
- This poor practice compromises children's safety and well-being. p.2
- This poor practice means that staff are not supported in their individual roles from the outset. p.3
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Children are placed at risk because the provider has failed to ensure that safeguarding and welfare requirements are met. p.2
- For instance, the provider does not ensure that all the required documentation is accessible and available for inspection. p.2
- This includes evidence of robust recruitment and vetting checks and to show that at least one member of staff holds a paediatric first-aid qualification. p.2
- Furthermore, induction and ongoing support for staff are weak. p.2
- As a result, some staff do not fully understand their roles and responsibilities. p.2
- This compromises children's safety and well-being. p.2
- Despite receiving little support from the provider, the manager and staff do, overall, work well as a team. p.2
- As a result, children are happy, settled and have secure relationships with staff. p.2
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Wellbeing & mental health2
“This poor practice compromises children's safety and well-being.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 946
- about usual (typical 804)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 52, typical 53
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 10%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Progressive Childcare @ St Chad's Primary School St Chads Rc Primary School, South Hill, Blackburn Road, Chorley PR6 8LL
p.1
This provision does not meet requirements
Children are placed at risk because the provider has failed to ensure that safeguarding and welfare requirements are met. For instance, the provider does not ensure that all the required documentation is accessible and available for inspection. This includes evidence of robust recruitment and vetting checks and to show that at least one member of staff holds a paediatric first-aid qualification. Furthermore, induction and ongoing support for staff are weak. As a result, some staff do not fully understand their roles and responsibilities. This compromises children's safety and well-being.
p.2
This provision does not meet requirements
Despite receiving little support from the provider, the manager and staff do, overall, work well as a team. As a result, children are happy, settled and have secure relationships with staff. Partnerships with the host school are embedded. As such, all children, including those with special educational needs and/or disabilities, enjoy their time at the club and have opportunities to extend their skills.
p.2
This provision does not meet requirements
Children arrive full of smiles and eagerly talk to staff about what they have been doing in school. Staff create a fun and exciting environment for the children. This is planned around children's interest and takes account of what children are learning in school. For example, younger children practise their writing skills as they make marks with pens on wipeable boards. Staff invite children to make decisions about the club. For example, children contribute their ideas when deciding the club rules. As a result, children know what is expected of them and diligently follow these rules.
p.2
need to do better?
n The manager is relatively new and is responsible for this setting and a sister setting within the company. While she is very eager to develop her skills and provide support for the staff, there is very little time afforded to her to do this. As a result, staff do not get the support they need. n The provider has not provided the manager with a robust programme of induction. Furthermore, they have not provided her with any supervision, training or coaching. As a result, she is unable to provide effective support for the rest of the staff team. This has a negative effect on staff's practice and well- being. For example, new staff report feeling as though they have been 'thrown in at the deep end'. Longstanding members of staff express their concern that there has been a recent decline in standards. n The weak oversite of the setting means that required documentation is not available for inspection. Therefore, these documents could not be checked at the
p.2
need to do better?
inspection to ensure that all staff are fully suitable for their roles. For example,
p.2
need to do better?
20 November 2023 the provider does not consistently record evidence of all recruitment and vetting checks completed for staff. In addition, some first-aid certificates are not available for inspection. This poor practice compromises children's safety and well-being. n The provider relies on the host school to provide assurances of some staff's paediatric first-aid qualifications instead of seeking this evidence for themselves. As a result, on the day of the inspection, they could not provide assurances of some qualifications, including that at least one member of staff who holds a valid paediatric first-aid qualification is available at all times when children are present. This places children at risk of harm. Steps were taken on the day of the inspection to address this in the short term. n Despite new staff accessing online safeguarding training, the manager and provider have not checked that they have understood this and can apply the
p.2
need to do better?
principles in practice. For example, some new staff do not know what to do should they have a concern about the conduct of a colleague. This places children at risk of harm. n The provider does not have robust systems in place for the effective coaching and supervision of staff. This poor practice means that staff are not supported in their individual roles from the outset. In addition, longstanding members of staff are not provided with any further continuous professional development opportunities that help to enhance their current skills and improve outcomes for children. n Staff promote children's independence and encourage them to eat healthily. For example, children have a go at peeling and chopping fruit and confidently pour their own drinks. n Staff are good role models and have high expectations for children's behaviour. They set clear rules and boundaries, which are discussed and agreed upon with
p.3
need to do better?
the children. As a result, children behave well and are kind, courteous and respectful. Older children show care and concern for younger children, explaining the rules of a game, for example, so they can participate.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective.
p.3
Safeguarding
Staff's suitability, qualifications and training cannot be verified due to some of the required documentation not being available during the inspection. Not all staff have a thorough understanding of all aspects of safeguarding procedures. This leaves children vulnerable and at risk. The setting is safe and secure. Staff work closely with the host school to ensure that children receive consistent levels of care and that the premises remain suitable for use.
p.3
Due date
ensure that all required documentation is available for inspection 15/12/2023
p.4
Due date
ensure all staff understand how to implement the setting's safeguarding policies and procedures so they are able to respond to concerns appropriately 15/12/2023
p.4
Due date
ensure that at least one person who holds a valid paediatric first-aid qualification is always on site when children are present 15/12/2023
p.4
Due date
implement robust induction procedures to ensure all staff have the knowledge and skills to fulfil their roles and responsibilities 15/12/2023
p.4
Due date
ensure that all staff are provided with sufficient coaching, supervision and opportunities for continuous professional development to secure a high-quality workforce. 15/12/2023
p.4
Setting details
Unique reference number EY496774 Local authority Lancashire Inspection number 10318862 Type of provision Childcare on non-domestic premises
p.5
Registers
Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register, Voluntary Childcare Register Day care type Out-of-school day care
p.5
inspection
Total number of places 30 Number of children on roll 45 Name of registered person Progressive Childcare Ltd
p.5
reference number
Telephone number 07901333299 Date of previous inspection 6 February 2018
p.5
Information about this early years setting
Progressive Childcare @ St Chad's Primary School registered in 2016. The club employs five members of childcare staff. Of these, two hold appropriate early years qualifications at level 3. The club opens from Monday to Friday, during term time only. Sessions are from 7.45am to 9am and 3.15pm to 6pm.
p.5
Inspection activities
n This was the first routine inspection the provider received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. The inspector discussed the impact of the pandemic with the provider and has taken that into account in their evaluation of the provider. n We carried out this inspection as a result of a risk assessment, following information we received about the provider. n The inspector viewed the provision and discussed the safety and suitability of the premises. n Children spoke to the inspector about what they enjoy doing while at the club. n Staff spoke to the inspector throughout the inspection. n The inspector observed interactions between staff and the children. n The inspector spoke to the provider about the leadership and management of the setting. n The inspector looked at relevant documentation.
p.6
Inspection activities
We carried out this inspection under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children's learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.
p.6
Inspection activities
20 November 2023 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.6
Inspection activities
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
Inspection activities
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk
p.7
Inspection activities
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
Inspection activities
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion