Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
Cadishead Primary School
Summary
Helen Friend (lead), Andy Reidel, David Woodhouse
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
9 Nov 2023
- Inspectors verified
Andy Reidel, David Woodhouse, Helen Friend
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Good
- Early years verified
Requires improvement
- Leadership and management verified
Inadequate
- Overall effectiveness verified
Inadequate
- Personal development verified
Good
- Quality of education verified
Inadequate
- Postcode verified
M44 5JD
- Name on report verified
Cadishead Primary School
- URN verified
131008
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2018.
- OverallInadequate
- Behaviour and attitudesGood
- Early yearsRequires improvement
- Leadership and managementInadequate
- Personal developmentGood
- Quality of educationInadequate
3% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (5,043 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Pupils are polite and enjoy strong friendships with their peers. p.2
- The school’s focus has been on managing behaviour at the expense of ensuring that pupils can thrive academically. p.2
- They told inspectors that they feel safe and happy in school. p.2
- As a result, pupils do not have the chance to flourish academically. p.2
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Leaders and governors lack the capacity to tackle the shortcomings at this school. p.2
- In the early years, including in the Nursery class, the school has begun to address curriculum weaknesses. p.3
- This compounds their weak achievement further. p.3
- This means that the school is not aware of, nor able to rectify, weaknesses in the quality of education that pupils receive. p.3
- The school has begun to take appropriate action to tackle pupils’ poor attendance. p.4
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Additionally, teachers’ checks on what pupils have understood or need to know next are ineffective. p.3
- Even so, they are not as well prepared for Year 1 as they should be. p.2
- Children in the early years are not as well prepared for Year 1 as they should be. p.4
- The school must clarify its curriculum thinking as a matter of urgency. p.4
- The school must ensure that the curriculum enables pupils to become fluent readers and writers, so that they are ready for their future learning. p.4
- The school must make sure that, alongside its work to improve the curriculum, it pays equal attention to how pupils’ learning will be assessed. p.5
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Progress & outcomes10
“This compounds their weak achievement further.” p.3Leadership & governance8
“Leaders and governors lack the capacity to tackle the shortcomings at this school.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 9
- Words of findings
- 1,804
- about usual (typical 1552)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 58, typical 53
- Average sentence
- 15 words
- Next steps
- 6
- typical 6
- Hedged sentences
- 8%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Cadishead Primary School Allotment Road, Cadishead, Manchester M44 5JD
p.1
Overall effectiveness Inadequate
The quality of education Inadequate Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Inadequate Early years provision Requires improvement Previous inspection grade Good 8 and 9 November 2023
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils in Years 1 to 6 do not receive the quality of education that they deserve. This means they do not achieve well. The school’s focus has been on managing behaviour at the expense of ensuring that pupils can thrive academically. This has overshadowed and hindered too many other aspects of the school’s development.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils said that behaviour has improved recently. Most pupils behave well. They told inspectors that they feel safe and happy in school. Pupils trust staff. They know that staff will look after them and listen to their worries. Staff act quickly to stop harmful behaviours.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils are polite and enjoy strong friendships with their peers. They are keen to learn. Children in the early years settle quickly into school. Recent improvements to the curriculum mean that they are learning more than in the past. Even so, they are not as well prepared for Year 1 as they should be.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils warmly welcome visitors to their school. They understand that it is important to show respect. Pupils value the differences between themselves and others, or alternative opinions.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils benefit from a range of experiences to complement their learning. They have opportunities to develop their talents and interests. Some pupils take pride in the special responsibilities that they carry out. These include acting as school and sports councillors. Pupils enjoy asking the sports council to arrange clubs of their choice.
p.2
better?
Leaders and governors lack the capacity to tackle the shortcomings at this school. Over time, due to the considerable focus on behaviour, the school has not taken the action needed to improve the quality of education that pupils receive. This has declined since the previous inspection. As a result, pupils do not have the chance to flourish academically. Governors have not asked enough questions to ensure that the school maintains an equal focus on pupils’ academic success as well as their emotional well-being.
p.2
better?
The school has not set out an ambitious curriculum that meets the needs of pupils. Too little thought has been given to what pupils need to learn and when this content should be taught. This prevents pupils, including those with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND), achieving well across many subjects. The published data for 2023 showed Year 6 pupils were ill-prepared for the next stage of their education.
p.2
better?
Without curriculum guidance, staff are unable to design activities that enable pupils to build their learning over time. Pupils are not helped to connect new learning to previous knowledge. As a result, pupils complete work that does not help them to build their knowledge as they move between topics and year groups. They do not 8 and 9 November 2023
p.2
3
gain a secure knowledge base. Additionally, teachers’ checks on what pupils have understood or need to know next are ineffective. Many pupils have wide gaps in their learning as a result.
p.3
3
In the early years, including in the Nursery class, the school has begun to address curriculum weaknesses. It has given more thought to what it intends children to learn and when this should happen in some areas of learning. Consequently, children in the early years now benefit from a curriculum that meets their learning needs more effectively than it did in the past. However, the school has not made sure that the curriculum is implemented consistently well across all areas of learning. This limits the readiness of some children to meet the demands of the key stage 1 curriculum.
p.3
3
Staff in the early years do not ensure that children gain the fundamental knowledge to write. This is a barrier to their learning in the early years and as they move into key stage 1. From this point on, the gaps in knowledge widen. Pupils do not gain the basic skills in writing that they need to be successful across the curriculum. This compounds their weak achievement further.
p.3
3
The school does not check what is being taught or how well pupils are learning. This means that the school is not aware of, nor able to rectify, weaknesses in the quality of education that pupils receive.
p.3
3
In contrast to the weaknesses in many subject areas, the school has been more successful in ensuring clarity in the mathematics curriculum and introducing a clear and coherent programme for early reading. Leaders have ensured that staff are well trained to deliver this programme consistently well. Children in the Reception class learn to match sounds to letters in daily lessons. The school keeps regular checks on the progress that pupils make in developing their phonics knowledge. It arranges rapid additional support for some pupils who are not keeping pace with the phonics programme. However, some pupils who need support to catch up with their peers do not receive timely or effective help. In several cases, this affects pupils’ confidence and hinders their fluency in reading. Despite the improvements to early reading, older pupils who have not benefited from this approach continue to have gaps in their reading knowledge. This hinders their access to the wider curriculum.
p.3
3
Teachers are suitably trained to identify pupils with additional needs. Leaders work closely with external partners to ensure that the needs of pupils with more complex SEND are assessed and met in a timely manner. However, like their classmates, pupils with SEND do not have access to a high-quality education. Consequently, they do not achieve well.
p.3
3
The school has made improving pupils’ behaviour a high priority. It has reviewed its approach to managing behaviour. Pupils and staff now understand and follow the whole school strategy. They recognise the importance of the school’s three rules of being ready, respectful and safe. Mostly, pupils behave well. They are well mannered and respectful. While there is some low-level disruption in lessons it does not typically hinder pupils’ learning. 8 and 9 November 2023
p.3
4
The school has begun to take appropriate action to tackle pupils’ poor attendance. The attendance of many pupils has improved as a result. However, the school’s actions have not been swift and robust enough to improve the attendance of some groups of pupils. Too many of these pupils continue to be regularly absent from school, which further impedes their achievement.
p.4
4
Pupils understand that other people may have faiths, cultures or family structures that are different to their own. Pupils learn about relationships and friendships and how to consider the views of others. They know how to keep themselves safe online and in the community.
p.4
4
The school considers the workload and well-being of staff in the decisions that it makes. Staff appreciate the time given by the school for them to complete any additional work. As a result, many of the staff feel valued and enjoy working at the school.
p.4
4
Many of the parents and carers who shared their views with inspectors were positive about the school. They said that they value the nurture and support that their children receive.
p.4
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.4
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
The school has not ensured that pupils in Years 1 to 6, including those with SEND, benefit from a well-designed curriculum. Pupils experience a disjointed and uneven learning journey between topics and year groups. This accounts for their poor achievement in many subjects. The school must clarify its curriculum thinking as a matter of urgency. It should design a curriculum that enables pupils to achieve well. The school does not make sure that pupils, especially older pupils and those who need to catch up, gain a secure grasp of the fundamental writing and reading knowledge that they need to access other subjects and succeed. This means that pupils are not well prepared for the next stage in education. The school must ensure that the curriculum enables pupils to become fluent readers and writers, so that they are ready for their future learning. Children in the early years are not as well prepared for Year 1 as they should be.
p.4
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
This is because the newly revised curriculum is not implemented well enough across different areas of learning. This is especially true in early writing. The school must ensure that staff are well equipped to deliver the curriculum, so that children have a secure foundation on which to build. 8 and 9 November 2023
p.4
5
The school does not check what is being taught and how well pupils are learning. This means that weaknesses in teaching are not addressed. This contributes to pupils’ poor achievement. The school must ensure that it improves the quality and effectiveness of subject leadership, so that the curriculum enables pupils to be successful. The assessment strategies that teachers use to check pupils’ learning in most subjects are ineffective. As a result, teachers are unsure about what pupils know and remember. This means that the school does not address gaps in pupils’ learning. The school must make sure that, alongside its work to improve the curriculum, it pays equal attention to how pupils’ learning will be assessed. In addition, the school must ensure that staff are trained to check pupils’ learning and adapt their teaching, so that pupils gain fluency and accuracy in their knowledge and understanding.
p.5
5
Too many pupils are persistently absent from school. Their learning is frequently disrupted as a result. Leaders should work with parents and other agencies to ensure that all pupils attend school regularly, so that they achieve well. Governors and leaders do not demonstrate the capacity required to improve the quality of education for pupils. They have presided over considerable weaknesses for a length of time. They have not addressed the significant weaknesses at the school or the negative impact that this has on the achievement of pupils. Governors should take urgent action to ensure that they improve their oversight of the school, so that they can hold leaders to account for their actions and the pace of improvement. The school may not appoint early career teachers before the next monitoring inspection.
p.5
How can I feed back my views?
or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.5
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.5
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.5
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at 8 and 9 November 2023
p.5
6
any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 8 and 9 November 2023
p.6
School details
Appropriate authority The governing body
p.7
School details
Chair of governing body Shellie Gartside
p.7
School details
Date of previous inspection 24 April 2018, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005
p.7
Information about this school
A new headteacher, deputy headteacher and chair of the governing body have been appointed since the previous inspection. The school does not make use of alternative provision.
p.7
Information about this inspection
The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.7
Information about this inspection
In accordance with section 44(1) of the Education Act 2005, His Majesty’s Chief Inspector is of the opinion that this school requires special measures because it is failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the persons responsible for leading, managing or governing the school are not demonstrating the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school.
p.7
Information about this inspection
Inspections are a point-in-time judgement about the quality of a school’s education provision. 8 and 9 November 2023
p.7
8
This was the first routine inspection that the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation. Inspectors conducted deep dives in English, including early reading, mathematics, physical education and geography. They met with subject leaders and teachers. They visited lessons, looked at examples of pupils’ work and talked with groups of pupils about their learning. The lead inspector observed pupils reading to a familiar adult. Inspectors considered the curriculum in other subjects. They met with leaders, spoke with pupils and reviewed pupils’ work in these subjects. The lead inspector spoke with members of the governing body, including the chair of governors. She also spoke with representatives of the local authority. Inspectors talked to staff about their workload and well-being.
p.8
8
Inspectors met with the leaders who are responsible for attendance, behaviour and pupils’ personal development. Inspectors looked at a range of policies and documents relating to pupils’ welfare and education. They observed pupils’ behaviour in lessons and around the school. To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the inspectors: reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first. Inspectors took account of the responses to Ofsted’s online survey for staff. There were no responses to Ofsted’s online survey for pupils. Inspectors met with parents at the start of the school day and took account of the responses to Ofsted Parent View, including the free-text responses.
p.8
Inspection team
Helen Friend, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector
p.8
Inspection team
Andy Reidel Ofsted Inspector 8 and 9 November 2023
p.8
9
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.9
9
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.9
9
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.9
9
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.9
9
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.9
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion