Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)
Children's Home run by Purple Ash Limited in Leicester
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Group verified
Purple Ash Limited
- Inspection date verified
8 Nov 2023
- Inspectors verified
Bev Allison
- Helped and protected verified
Requires improvement to be good
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement to be good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement to be good
- Name on report verified
2691652
- URN verified
2691652
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2023.
- OverallRI to be good
- Helped and protectedRI to be good
- Leadership and managementRI to be good
13% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement to be good (12,716 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement to be good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The managers and staff have gone through a turbulent time, with poor inspection judgements, significant changes in staffing and a child who has moved on from the placement due to them being placed at risk. p.4
- Overall judgement at last inspection: inadequate p.1
- However, the recording and management of information were poor. p.3
- The provider failed to escalate this matter. p.3
- This has the potential to lead to poor care planning for children. p.4
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- This specifically relates to managers embedding monitoring systems in the home to improve the quality of care. p.5
- This particularly relates to ensuring that the provider escalates delays in processes relating to statutory visits, strategy meetings, return interviews and progressing care plans. 10 December p.6
- The registered person should ensure that when a child returns to the home after being missing from care or away from the home without permission, the responsible local authority provides an opportunity for the child to have an independent return home interview. p.6
- Homes should take account of information provided by such interviews when assessing risks and putting arrangements in place to protect each child. p.6
- The registered person should ensure that emergency admissions are not taken unless the home’s statement of purpose and its capacity and support systems mean that it has the capability to care for children admitted at very short notice while continuing to offer high-quality care to children already living in the home. p.6
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance10
“However, the recording and management of information were poor.” p.3Progress & outcomes5
“This has enabled positive progress in their care planning.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 9
- Words of findings
- 1,345
- shorter than usual (typical 1899)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 50, typical 50
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 5
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 7%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection report for children’s home: 2691652 1 Registered provider: Purple Ash Limited Full inspection Inspected under the social care common inspection framework
p.1
Information about this children’s home
This home is privately run and provides care for up to three children with social and emotional difficulties.
p.1
Information about this children’s home
There has been no registered manager since 1 July 2023. Ofsted did receive an application from a manager who is currently working at the home. However, this was later withdrawn. There is now another new manager who is in the process of applying to Ofsted.
p.1
Information about this children’s home
There was one child living at the home at the time of the inspection. Another child had recently left the home.
p.1
Overall experiences and progress of
children and young people, taking into account
p.1
requires improvement to be good
How well children and young people are helped and protected requires improvement to be good
p.1
requires improvement to be good
The effectiveness of leaders and managers requires improvement to be good
p.1
requires improvement to be good
The children’s home is not yet delivering good help and care for children and young people. However, there are no serious or widespread failures that result in their welfare not being safeguarded or promoted.
p.1
requires improvement to be good
Overall judgement at last inspection: inadequate
p.1
requires improvement to be good
Enforcement action since last inspection: none Inspection report for children’s home: 2691652 2
p.1
Inspection date Inspection type Inspection judgement
15/08/2023 Full Inadequate 16/05/2023 Full Inadequate 17/01/2023 Full Requires improvement to be good Inspection report for children’s home: 2691652 3
p.2
improvement to be good
The home has been through an unsettled period due to changes in leadership and management and the instability of staffing. The one child currently living at the home said, ‘The entire staff team has changed.’ This has recently settled, with the staff team being at full capacity and a newly appointed manager in post.
p.3
improvement to be good
One child was moved on from the home due to significant risk factors in the community. Staff made attempts to keep the child safe but were not always able to prevent prolonged periods of the child being missing from care. However, the child did maintain a positive link with some staff after leaving the home.
p.3
improvement to be good
The remaining child has made progress. Despite struggling to engage in education, they have improved in most areas of their life. This has enabled positive progress in their care planning.
p.3
improvement to be good
The child has a variety of ways to share their views, wishes and feelings. Staff complete regular, varied and relevant direct-work sessions with the child that are positive and reflective.
p.3
improvement to be good
The child has been sensitively supported to explore their identity. Consequently, they are starting to have a better understanding of who they are and who they want to be. This is in addition to staff providing good support with the child’s individual cultural and religious needs.
p.3
improvement to be good
When there were significant incidents linked to a child going missing from the home, the staff followed the appropriate safeguarding protocols. Staff took prompt action to reduce the risks to the child. However, return home interviews were not clearly recorded.
p.3
improvement to be good
Staff had followed agreed processes to try and locate the child. There is evidence that the staff had searched local areas regularly and attempted to contact the child. The acting manager was proactive in sharing information. However, the recording and management of information were poor. This made it difficult to establish the exact times the child was missing from care when a multi-agency strategy meeting took place. There were times when other agencies cancelled these meetings. The provider failed to escalate this matter.
p.3
improvement to be good
Physical interventions are used as a last resort. When they are used, there is good oversight and reflection. Inspection report for children’s home: 2691652 4
p.3
good
The managers and staff have gone through a turbulent time, with poor inspection judgements, significant changes in staffing and a child who has moved on from the placement due to them being placed at risk. The deputy manager has stepped up and supported the acting manager to stabilise the home. The newly appointed responsible individual supported the manager in making the difficult decision to end a placement.
p.4
good
There were delays in leaders accessing the correct information in a timely manner. In addition, there was a delay in managers responding to an action plan following a local authority quality assurance visit. The responsible individual acknowledged this and commented that the recording systems are due to be replaced with a view to improving recording and management systems and processes.
p.4
good
Shortages, changes in staff and the use of agency staff have added to the strain. This has meant that recording and management monitoring have not always been of a good standard.
p.4
good
The newly appointed responsible individual was able to identify the shortfalls in leadership and management at the home and has implemented an action plan to address these shortfalls. Some of these changes are in place, and others are planned to be implemented.
p.4
good
Leaders and managers have not escalated matters when local authorities have not exercised their duties. Statutory social work visits, care planning delays and an out-of- date education, health and care plan were not escalated appropriately. This has the potential to lead to poor care planning for children.
p.4
good
Staff receive regular mandatory training and supervision. Staff say they enjoy working at the home and things are now more settled. Staff have not received training in a model of practice that is specifically set out in the statement of purpose. The staff training matrix is not up to date and does not hold the correct information. Inspection report for children’s home: 2691652 5
p.4
Statutory requirements
This section sets out the actions that the registered person(s) must take to meet the Care Standards Act 2000, The Children’s Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the ‘Guide to the Children’s Homes Regulations, including the quality standards’. The registered person(s) must comply within the given timescales.
p.5
Requirement Due date
The leadership and management standard is that the registered person enables, inspires and leads a culture in relation to the children’s home that—
p.5
Requirement Due date
helps children aspire to fulfil their potential; and
p.5
Requirement Due date
In particular, the standard in paragraph (1) requires the registered person to—
p.5
Requirement Due date
lead and manage the home in a way that is consistent with the approach and ethos, and delivers the outcomes, set out in the home’s statement of purpose;
p.5
Requirement Due date
understand the impact that the quality of care provided in the home is having on the progress and experiences of each child and use this understanding to inform the development of the quality of care provided in the home;
p.5
Requirement Due date
demonstrate that practice in the home is informed and improved by taking into account and acting on—
p.5
Requirement Due date
feedback on the experiences of children, including complaints received; and
p.5
Requirement Due date
use monitoring and review systems to make continuous improvements in the quality of care provided in the home. (Regulation 13 (1)(a)(b) (2)(a)(f)(g)(ii)(h))
p.5
Requirement Due date
This specifically relates to managers embedding monitoring systems in the home to improve the quality of care.
p.5
Requirement Due date
This requirement was made at the last inspection and is restated. 10 December Inspection report for children’s home: 2691652 6 In meeting the quality standards, the registered person must, and must ensure that staff—
p.5
Requirement Due date
seek to involve each child’s placing authority effectively in the child’s care, in accordance with the child’s relevant plans;
p.6
Requirement Due date
seek to secure the input and services required to meet each child’s needs;
p.6
Requirement Due date
if the registered person considers, or staff consider, a placing authority’s or a relevant person’s performance or response to be inadequate in relation to their role, challenge the placing authority or the relevant person to seek to ensure that each child’s needs are met in accordance with the child’s relevant plans; and
p.6
Requirement Due date
seek to develop and maintain effective professional relationships with such persons, bodies or organisations as the registered person considers appropriate having regard to the range of needs of children for whom it is intended that the children’s home is to provide care and accommodation. (Regulation 5 (a)(b)(c)(d))
p.6
Requirement Due date
This particularly relates to ensuring that the provider escalates delays in processes relating to statutory visits, strategy meetings, return interviews and progressing care plans. 10 December
p.6
Recommendations
The registered person should ensure that when a child returns to the home after being missing from care or away from the home without permission, the responsible local authority provides an opportunity for the child to have an independent return home interview. Homes should take account of information provided by such interviews when assessing risks and putting arrangements in place to protect each child. (Guide to the Children’s Homes Regulations, including the quality standards’, page 45 paragraph 9.30) The registered person should ensure that emergency admissions are not taken unless the home’s statement of purpose and its capacity and support systems mean that it has the capability to care for children admitted at very short notice while continuing to offer high-quality care to children already living in the home. (Guide to the Children’s Homes Regulations, including the quality standards’, page
p.6
Recommendations
15, paragraph 3.6) Inspection report for children’s home: 2691652 7
p.6
Information about this inspection
Inspectors have looked closely at the experiences and progress of children and young people, using the social care common inspection framework. This inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service, how it meets the core functions of the service as set out in legislation, and to consider how well it complies with The Children’s Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the ‘Guide to the Children’s Homes Regulations, including the quality standards’. Inspection report for children’s home: 2691652 8
p.7
Children’s home details
Registered provider address: West Midlands House, Gipsy Lane WV13 2HA
p.8
Inspector
Bev Allison, Social Care Inspector Inspection report for children’s home: 2691652 9 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.8
Inspector
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.9
Inspector
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.9
Inspector
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.9
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion