Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
William Edwards School
Summary
Jonathan Rockey (lead), Cathy Barr, Claire Robins, Sarah Fowler, Susan Sutton
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
8 Nov 2023
- Inspectors verified
Cathy Barr, Claire Robins, Jonathan Rockey, Sarah Fowler, Susan Sutton
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Requires improvement
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement
- Personal development verified
Good
- Quality of education verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
RM16 3NJ
- Name on report verified
William Edwards School
- URN verified
137214
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2019.
- OverallRequires improvement
- Behaviour and attitudesRequires improvement
- Leadership and managementGood
- Personal developmentGood
- Quality of educationRequires improvement
15% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (5,043 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Pupils do not always understand how well they are doing because the way they are assessed is not effective. p.2
- They feel that the school supports them and that, if they have a concern, they will be taken seriously. p.2
- This disruption is not always challenged, so it continues. p.2
- The quality of education at the school is not yet good because the curriculum in some subjects does not sufficiently challenge pupils. p.2
- Pupils’ attitudes towards their learning are not always appropriate because the school’s action to address this has not yet been sufficient. p.2
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The headteacher of this school is Simon Bell. p.1
- This school is part of South West Essex Community Education Trust, which means other people in the trust also have responsibility for running the school. p.1
- The trust is run by the chief executive officer, Stephen Munday, and overseen by a board of trustees, chaired by Viv Northall. p.1
- Simon Bell is also the executive headteacher of one other school. 7 and 8 November 2023 p.1
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance6
“Leaders are fiercely ambitious for the school.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,122
- about usual (typical 1215)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 55, typical 56
- Average sentence
- 14 words
- Next steps
- 4
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 29%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of William Edwards School Stifford Clays Road, Stifford Clays, Grays, Essex RM16 3NJ
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Requires improvement Personal development Good Leadership and management Good Previous inspection grade Requires improvement
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
The headteacher of this school is Simon Bell. This school is part of South West Essex Community Education Trust, which means other people in the trust also have responsibility for running the school. The trust is run by the chief executive officer, Stephen Munday, and overseen by a board of trustees, chaired by Viv Northall. Simon Bell is also the executive headteacher of one other school. 7 and 8 November 2023
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Most pupils at William Edwards feel part of the school community and see positive changes happening in the school, such as improving behaviour at social times. They feel that the school supports them and that, if they have a concern, they will be taken seriously. Pupils rarely experience unkind language. Pupils are safe here.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
In some lessons, the expectations of staff are not always high enough. The work pupils are asked to do does not always challenge them. Pupils are not always sure about what they have learned. They struggle to remember important information. Some pupils do not take pride in their work. The quality of the work they produce is not high. This is too often not addressed by their teachers.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Some pupils do not always behave well. In some classes, pupils are not able to work hard and concentrate because their learning is interrupted by poor behaviour. This disruption is not always challenged, so it continues.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
There are opportunities for pupils to develop character outside the classroom. The school is proud of its large Duke of Edinburgh’s Award cohort. The school also offers a range of extra-curricular activities and visits and trips abroad. Pupils can also have input into the life of the school through leadership opportunities, including taking on the role of sports leader.
p.2
better?
The quality of education at the school is not yet good because the curriculum in some subjects does not sufficiently challenge pupils. It lacks ambition. In some subjects, the work given to pupils is too simplistic for their age, and the resources they are provided with do not support their learning. Pupils do not always understand how well they are doing because the way they are assessed is not effective. The feedback they receive on their work, for example through whole-class comments, is not valued or acted on by the pupils. In some subjects, where there is a defined and rigorous approach to assessing pupils’ knowledge, progress is better.
p.2
better?
While there is a focus on reading, this is not yet sufficiently rigorous to ensure that the weakest readers make rapid progress. Leaders are taking action to address this.
p.2
better?
The identification and assessment of pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) is effective. Teachers know their pupils well and are provided with appropriate information in relation to their needs. The needs of pupils with SEND are typically met in class. SEND provision is monitored closely.
p.2
better?
Social times are calm. Pupils chat happily with their friends. Some pupils comment that this atmosphere is because the school has recently changed its policy on mobile phones; they speak about this positively. However, behaviour in lessons is too often not good. Pupils’ attitudes towards their learning are not always appropriate because the school’s action to address this has not yet been sufficient. Pupils are not always 7 and 8 November 2023
p.2
3
respectful to staff or one another in lessons. This creates a challenging environment that has a significant impact on learning in some lessons. Where the school’s policy on behaviour is applied effectively, behaviour is better. However, all too often this is not consistent.
p.3
3
The school has worked hard to ensure that pupils attend regularly. High attendance is valued and rewarded. This has extended to changing school bus routes to enable pupils to attend more easily. As a result, attendance is above national average. Pupils arrive at school and lessons on time.
p.3
3
Pupils learn an appropriate programme of personal, social and health education. Most pupils can explain how they can keep themselves healthy and safe. The programme includes independent advice on career opportunities and choices. Many pupils are actively involved in the wider life of the school. A high proportion of disadvantaged pupils participate in extra-curricular activities.
p.3
3
Leaders are fiercely ambitious for the school. They have a clear vision of what they want to achieve. Leaders recognise the inconsistency in the school and are determined to ensure that all pupils receive the highest-quality education. However, the impact of leaders’ actions to date has yet to be fully realised. The school faces many challenges such as significant issues with the recruitment and retention of staff.
p.3
3
The school engages well with its community. Staff are proud to work at William Edwards and they recognise that the school is supportive of their well-being and workload. Parents are beginning to come on board, and most would recommend the school.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
Work given to pupils does not always enable them to achieve the aims of the curriculum. As a result, they do not make the progress they should. The school must ensure that teaching approaches and tasks provided are designed to help pupils remember and understand the curriculum. Assessment is not always used well. Understanding is not checked systematically, and pupils’ misconceptions are not always addressed. As a result, teachers do not identify when pupils do not understand their work. The way in which assessment is used should be reviewed thoroughly to significantly improve the consistency and impact of the approach. The behaviour of pupils in some lessons is not appropriate because the school’s behaviour policy is not implemented consistently. Poor behaviour in some classes 7 and 8 November 2023
p.3
4
causes learning to be disrupted frequently. The school must ensure that the new behaviour policy is applied consistently and rigorously in all classes.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.4
Further information
In the report, ‘ disadvantaged pupils ’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 7 and 8 November 2023
p.4
School details
Number of pupils on the school roll 1,225
p.5
School details
Dates of previous inspection 1 and 2 May 2019
p.5
Information about this school
The school is part of South West Essex Community Education Trust. The school makes use of one registered alternative provider. The school meets the requirements of the provider access legislation, which requires schools to provide pupils in Years 8 to 13 with information and engagement about approved technical education qualifications and apprenticeships.
p.5
Information about this inspection
The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.5
Information about this inspection
Inspections are a point-in-time judgement about the quality of a school’s education provision. Inspectors discussed any continued impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school. 7 and 8 November 2023
p.5
6
The inspection team met with representatives of the trust, including trustees and the chief executive officer. Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: English, mathematics, modern foreign languages, science and art. For each deep dive, inspectors held discussions about the curriculum, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work. An additional curriculum review was undertaken in history at the request of school leaders. To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the inspectors: reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first. The inspection team met with pupils from different year groups to talk about their learning and experiences at school. The inspection team also considered the 122
p.6
6
responses to the pupil questionnaire. Inspectors reviewed a range of documents provided by the school. These included the school improvement plan, curriculum documentation and school policies. Inspectors considered 37 responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire for parents and carers, Ofsted Parent View. This included 26 comments from parents in the free-text facility. Inspectors also considered the 80 responses to the staff questionnaire.
p.6
Inspection team
Jonathan Rockey, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector
p.6
Inspection team
Susan Sutton Ofsted Inspector 7 and 8 November 2023
p.6
7
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
7
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
7
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
7
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
7
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion