Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School monitoring visit

Setting

Inspected — · published 12 Dec 2023

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Marian Feeley

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Marian Feeley

  • Postcode verified

    TN29 0LE

  • Name on report verified

    Dymchurch Primary School This letter sets out the findings from the monitoring inspection that took place on 8

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+59Positivemore positive than 90% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivestrong relationshipsconsistentlypositiveengagingeffectivelykeensecure
Criticismrequires improvementnot alwaysnot consistent

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings627w+75
  • What needs to improve208w−43

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
835
shorter than usual (typical 1570)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 52, typical 47
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
12%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 75%What needs to improve 25%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Iain Rudgyard Headteacher Dymchurch Primary School New Hall Close Dymchurch Romney Marsh Kent TN29 0LE

p.1

Requires improvement monitoring inspection of Dymchurch Primary School

This letter sets out the findings from the monitoring inspection that took place on 8 November 2023, on behalf of His Majesty's Chief Inspector of Education, Children's Services and Skills. The monitoring inspection was carried out under section 8(2) of the Education Act 2005 and took place because the school has received two successive judgements of requires improvement at its previous graded (section 5) inspections.

p.1

Requires improvement monitoring inspection of Dymchurch Primary School

The purpose of a monitoring inspection is not to grade the school's overall effectiveness, but to identify and report on the school's progress. It is to highlight to the school and parents any improvements that school leaders have made since the school's previous graded inspection.

p.1

Requires improvement monitoring inspection of Dymchurch Primary School

During the inspection, I discussed with you and other senior leaders, the chief executive officer (CEO) of the trust, the chair of the trust board and governors the actions that have been taken to improve the school since the most recent graded inspection. We discussed the ongoing impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, and I looked at the school’s development plans. I also carried out visits to lessons, listened to some pupils read, held meetings with other staff, and talked to pupils. I have considered all this in coming to my judgement.

p.1

Leaders have made progress to improve the school, but more work is

necessary for the school to become good.

p.1

Main findings

Since the last inspection there has been a change in some key leadership roles, including your appointment as headteacher. The school has also established its own governing body, known as the ‘local monitoring council’.

p.2

Main findings

Your focus on the curriculum has already ensured that there are now appropriate sequences of learning in place across each subject area. These have been the result of careful work to identify the key knowledge and skills that all pupils need to know. They are planned from the early years upwards. These plans are now becoming more embedded, but there are some subjects that are further along in this journey than others. You have rightly prioritised the core areas of early reading and mathematics, although recognise that there is more work to do to embed the curriculum plans in the wider foundation subjects.

p.2

Main findings

There have also been effective curriculum plans put in place for the early years. These are also well considered in terms of how they will prepare children for their learning as they move to Year 1. Key vocabulary for each unit has been identified, however, in the classroom there is still a need to maximise the opportunities for staff to model talk and communication with children.

p.2

Main findings

The teaching of phonics is now broadly effective. You have ensured that staff have been trained to deliver the new phonics programme. Wider support from the local English subject hub, as well as the trust, has helped to develop this practice. The school monitors this work, and this close scrutiny is helping to improve where there still need to be refinements. For example, there is recognition that the phonics lessons could provide greater support, so that pupils recognise sounds with increasing fluency. There is also a need to ensure that misconceptions are picked up by staff consistently when pupils read to them. This will allow staff to correct pupils when mistakes are made and so further develop pupils’ accuracy and confidence.

p.2

Main findings

In lessons, there are strong relationships between staff and pupils. Pupils have positive attitudes to learning, and they are keen to engage. Staff show generally secure subject knowledge in their explanations. There are some effective ways in which misconceptions are being picked up by staff, but this is not always consistent. Leaders acknowledge the need for there to be more support for staff to ensure that questioning is used precisely, so that teachers can gauge what pupils have understood and, importantly, adapt their input in lessons to ensure that misconceptions do not persist.

p.2

Main findings

There is now greater stability in the senior leadership team with the appointment of yourself as headteacher, as well as a new special educational needs coordinator from September 2022. Your work as leaders is already having evident impact on the school’s progress on the areas identified in the last inspection, as well as engaging with the parents and carers in the school community. There has been effective support from the trust, including support for strategic planning, and sharing effective practice between trust schools. Middle leaders have started to be supported in terms of their leadership of key

p.2

OFFICIAL-SENSITIVE

subjects, and this is helping curriculum improvement. However, there is still further work to do in this area, particularly supporting leaders at all levels in establishing the mechanisms to assure themselves that subjects are being delivered as effectively as they intend.

p.3

OFFICIAL-SENSITIVE

I am copying this letter to the chair of the board of trustees, and the CEO of the Our Community Multi Academy Trust, the Department for Education's regional director and the director of children's services for Kent. This letter will be published on the Ofsted reports website.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion