Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
The Oxford Academy
Summary
Mary Davies (lead), Andy Johnson, Helen Middleton, Mike Serridge, Paul Gibson
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
19 Oct 2023
- Inspectors verified
Andy Johnson, Helen Middleton, Mary Davies, Mike Serridge, Paul Gibson
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Requires improvement
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement
- Personal development verified
Requires improvement
- Quality of education verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
OX4 6JZ
- Name on report verified
The Oxford Academy
- URN verified
148354
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallRequires improvement
- Behaviour and attitudesRequires improvement
- Leadership and managementGood
- Personal developmentRequires improvement
- Quality of educationRequires improvement
15% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (5,043 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Sixth-form students are excellent role models, however. p.2
- The school should continue to support staff so that practice across the school is consistently strong, and all pupils achieve highly. 18 and 19 October 2023 p.3
- Routines and systems to support behaviour management are having a positive impact generally and staff use them increasingly consistently. p.3
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Previous inspection grade Not previously inspected under section 5 of the Education Act 2005 p.1
- The headteacher of this school is Nora Ward. p.1
- This school is part of River Learning Trust, which means other people in the trust also have responsibility for running the school. p.1
- The trust is run by the chief executive officer, Paul James, and overseen by a board of trustees, chaired by Kirsten Robinson. 18 and 19 October 2023 p.1
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Teaching & assessment9
“Consequently, teaching is not always effective.” p.2Reading & phonics3
“The school’s reading strategy is well considered, but new.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,263
- about usual (typical 1215)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 52, typical 56
- Average sentence
- 14 words
- Next steps
- 4
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 8%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of The Oxford Academy Sandy Lane West, Littlemore, Oxford, Oxfordshire OX4 6JZ
p.1
Inspection dates: 18 and 19 October 2023
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Requires improvement Personal development Requires improvement Leadership and management Good Sixth-form provision Good
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
Previous inspection grade Not previously inspected under section 5 of the Education Act 2005
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
The headteacher of this school is Nora Ward. This school is part of River Learning Trust, which means other people in the trust also have responsibility for running the school. The trust is run by the chief executive officer, Paul James, and overseen by a board of trustees, chaired by Kirsten Robinson. 18 and 19 October 2023
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Over recent years, leaders’ actions have started a positive transformation at the school. Pupils now feel safe and value the care shown to them by staff. Sixth formers especially are very proud of their school. However, the school knows there is more to be done to fully embed its improvement work.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
The school’s new curriculum is aspirational and appropriate for all. The quality of teaching is developing, and staff are well supported by the school and the trust. However, teaching does not yet support all pupils to achieve highly enough, including some pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). That said, curriculum work is more embedded in the sixth form, where students learn more effectively.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
The school has raised expectations of behaviour. Pupils and staff acknowledge things are improving. On the whole, pupils behave well in lessons and conduct in social time is generally orderly. However, pupils are heavily supervised. It is not yet the norm for pupils to take responsibility for their own behaviour. For example, pupils’ use of mobile phones and derogatory language, or ‘banter’, are still too common. Sixth-form students are excellent role models, however. Indeed, many volunteer to help supervise during breaks.
p.2
better?
The curriculum offer is aspirational for all. Most pupils with SEND study alongside their peers. The school identifies pupils’ individual needs and how teachers can help them. Many teachers value this information and use it in lessons. Where appropriate, the school provides alternative programmes. The ‘enhanced key stage 3 pathway’ successfully prepares its pupils to transfer to the main curriculum from Year 9. The new ‘foundation’ programme in Year 12 prepares students for future A- level or vocational study.
p.2
better?
Most teachers create calm and orderly classrooms and pupils generally complete what is asked of them. However, pupils do not yet achieve as highly as they could, including pupils with SEND. Subject teams have identified what pupils must know at each point. They have been less clear how this knowledge connects so that pupils can apply it successfully. Consequently, teaching is not always effective. Most teachers check that pupils can remember what they have been taught. However, they do not routinely check for understanding. This means they often move on before learning is embedded and feedback is not as helpful as it could be. In the sixth form, teaching is more effective. Typically, students remember and can apply what they have learned to different types of problems.
p.2
better?
The school’s reading strategy is well considered, but new. Where pupils cannot yet read fluently, the school has identified their needs. The school has appropriate support programmes available, but these have not yet been rolled out fully. The 18 and 19 October 2023
p.2
3
tutor reading programme is also in its early stages. However, there is evidence of positive impact in Years 7 and 8.
p.3
3
Routines and systems to support behaviour management are having a positive impact generally and staff use them increasingly consistently. The school recognises that some pupils struggle to meet expectations. The expanded behaviour and inclusion team provides appropriate support. The school’s chaplaincy contributes significantly to inclusion work. However, some pupils perceive the adjustments made in some cases as unfair, especially when they feel that they are themselves trying to meet expectations independently. Nevertheless, punctuality to lessons and attendance is improving, and the number of serious incidents and suspensions is starting to fall.
p.3
3
The school’s personal development programme is thorough. It covers required content, such as consent and equality, as well as local issues, such as knife crime. However, the delivery is not as effective as it could be. For example, pupils do not routinely discuss and debate themes in depth or have opportunities to explore taking responsibility. The school offers a range of extra-curricular activities, but participation is low in Years 7 to 11. On the other hand, sixth-form students enjoy giving back to their school through numerous leadership opportunities. All pupils follow a well-considered careers programme which is supported by local employers. Pupils are well prepared for their next steps.
p.3
3
The school’s capacity for improvement has increased significantly since joining the trust. Robust plans are in place to continue transforming the school. The trust provides strong support and challenge to school leaders. The trust also discharges its statutory duties diligently, not least regarding safeguarding. Leaders strive to engage the local community with the school. They listen to parents and keep them informed of decisions and improvement work. The school is mindful of staff workload and well-being. It provides high-quality training and support. Staff recognise this and they feel valued and respected.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
The school’s actions to develop the curriculum are not fully embedded, particularly in terms of the delivery in key stages 3 and 4. As a result, too many pupils, including those with additional needs, do not have the secure knowledge and understanding that they need to achieve well. The school should continue to support staff so that practice across the school is consistently strong, and all pupils achieve highly. 18 and 19 October 2023
p.3
4
The school’s new reading strategy has not been fully rolled out. Consequently, pupils do not yet read widely enough, and those who cannot read fluently are not supported to catch up. The school should ensure that its strategy is fully embedded as quickly as possible. The school has raised expectations of behaviour and there have been improvements since the last inspection. However, poor behaviour is still not consistently addressed by staff. The school should continue to provide staff with the support they need so that approaches are implemented consistently in and out of lessons. The school’s work to help all pupils to develop a positive attitude to school life is not yet embedded. As a result, it is not yet typical school culture for all pupils to take responsibility for their own behaviour, including how they speak to, and about, others. The school should continue to provide more clear and meaningful
p.4
4
opportunities for pupils to demonstrate these.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.4
Further information
In the report, ‘ disadvantaged pupils ’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 18 and 19 October 2023
p.4
provision
Number of pupils on the school roll 1174
p.5
sixth form
Date of previous inspection Not previously inspected under section 5 of the Education Act 2005
p.5
Information about this school
The school joined the River Learning Trust in November 2020. The school currently uses two registered and four unregistered alternative providers. The school is part of the Diocese of Oxford. A Section 48 inspection is scheduled for 2023-2024. The school meets the requirements of the provider access legislation. The legislation requires schools to provide pupils in Years 7 to 13 with information and engagement about approved technical education qualifications and apprenticeships. 18 and 19 October 2023
p.5
Information about this inspection
The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.6
Information about this inspection
Inspections are a point-in-time judgement about the quality of a school’s education provision. This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school. Inspectors held meetings with trust and school leaders, members of staff and pupils. The lead inspector also met with representatives of the trust board, the local governing body and the diocese. Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: English, mathematics, science, geography and physical education. For each deep dive, inspectors discussed the curriculum, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work from all key stages. Inspectors also looked at key stage 4 lessons in a range of subjects.
p.6
Information about this inspection
To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the inspectors reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first. Inspectors spoke with staff and pupils to gather their views. They considered parents’ and carers’ responses to Ofsted’s online survey, Ofsted Parent View. Inspectors also took account of responses to the staff and pupil surveys.
p.6
Inspection team
Mary Davies, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector
p.6
Inspection team
Paul Gibson Ofsted Inspector 18 and 19 October 2023
p.6
7
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
7
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
7
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
7
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
7
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion