Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Pinchmill Primary School

Inspected 1 Nov 2023 · URN 109451

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Al Mistrano (lead), Lesley Stevens

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    1 Nov 2023

  • Inspectors verified

    Al Mistrano, Lesley Stevens

  • Postcode verified

    MK43 7JD

  • Name on report verified

    Pinchmill Primary School

  • URN verified

    109451

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+12Mostly positivemore positive than 12% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectivelyimprovedeffectiveproudenjoystrongnurturingcaring
Criticismconcernsseriousseriouslylackfalling behindtoo oftennot consistentlyweaker

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1252w+12
  • Safeguarding137w+10

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,385
about usual (typical 1153)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 54, typical 55
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
6
typical 4
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 66%Safeguarding 7%About the inspection 26%

Full report text

Inspection of a good school: Pinchmill Primary School The Old Road, Felmersham, Bedford, Bedfordshire MK43 7JD

p.1

Outcome

There has been no change to this school’s overall judgement of good as a result of this ungraded (section 8) inspection. However, the evidence gathered suggests that the inspection grade might not be as high if a graded (section 5) inspection were carried out now. The school’s next inspection will be a graded inspection.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils, and their parents, appreciate the school’s nurturing environment. Pupils live up to the school’s values of ‘Respect, Responsible and Ready’. They learn to be considerate of other’s needs. The caring ethos evident throughout the school ensures that pupils feel safe. They willingly take responsibility for themselves, their peers and the school. Pupils feel proud to take up leadership positions, such as in the school council.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Starting in nursery, pupils take learning seriously. They sustain concentration for extended periods and focus on their studies. Pupils work well together and encourage each other to succeed. They are articulate and listen well to others during discussions. However, after a period of staff turbulence, the school’s curriculum is underdeveloped. This has led to pupils not achieving as well as they could.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils benefit from the school’s wide range of enrichment and extra-curricular opportunities. These enable pupils to develop new talents and interests while broadening their understanding of the curriculum. During play time and in clubs, pupils take advantage of the impressive opportunities to enhance their learning in physical education (PE). Pupils proudly speak of their many successes in sporting competitions against other schools.

p.1

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

The school’s curriculum is currently being redesigned. Curriculum plans are at an early stage of development. They do not provide sufficient guidance for staff to know exactly what pupils must know and understand for each subject. As a result, teachers do not teach all of the key knowledge pupils need and sometimes arrange activities that lack 1 November 2023

p.1

2

purpose. Consequently, pupils do not gain a secure grasp of important knowledge over time.

p.2

2

Staff check what pupils know and understand with varying effectiveness. This leads to pupils falling behind. Where curriculum plans contain sufficient detail about what pupils must know, teachers check pupils’ knowledge more precisely.

p.2

2

The school, with the support of specialists from the local authority, have improved how well staff identify the needs of pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). However, the school has not ensured that staff have the guidance to support many pupils with SEND well. The current guidance is too often generic and not well matched to pupils’ needs. This leads to teachers not providing support for these pupils’ needs with consistent effectiveness. Leaders are now in the process of writing the guidance staff need to plan support that matches the exact needs of these pupils. However, for pupils with social, emotional and mental health needs, the school provides effective support. These pupils learn to manage their emotions and behaviour effectively.

p.2

2

Starting in the nursery, pupils are encouraged to enjoy reading. They make good use of the well-stocked library. The school ensures that children in the nursery develop sophisticated use of language and are ready to learn the basics of reading. The school ensures that most pupils learn to read fluently. However, when pupils find learning to read difficult, the school does not provide pupils with the right levels of support or practice. The school does not routinely give texts that accurately match pupils’ reading abilities. As a result, these pupils do not get enough practice in the areas they find difficult so do not catch up quickly. Similarly, these pupils’ access to the curriculum is limited because the texts given to them are too hard.

p.2

2

The school recently redesigned the behaviour policy. Staff and pupils understand the school’s expectations and its approach to rewards and sanctions. Staff manage behaviour effectively and fairly. A pleasant and purposeful atmosphere is maintained throughout the school day.

p.2

2

Provision for pupils’ broader development is strong. Pupils are well prepared to live alongside people with diverse beliefs and lifestyles.

p.2

2

After a period of staff change, the school is developing leadership at all levels. With support from the local authority, governance has improved. Governors require leaders to provide them with the information needed to understand the quality of the school’s provision. Governors now challenge leaders to ensure that the school makes the necessary improvements.

p.2

2

Staff and parents are positive about the school. All staff are proud of and enjoy working at the school. They feel well supported. Parents are noticing the changes taking place. Many commented on how much the school has improved this academic year.

p.2

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective. 1 November 2023

p.2

3

At the start of this academic year, leaders and governors responded to a complaint raised against the school by commissioning an external audit of safeguarding practices. This led to the redesign of safeguarding policies and procedures.

p.3

3

Staff are well trained and are vigilant to signs of potential harm. When concerns arise, staff act swiftly and in line with school expectations. The school works effectively with external agencies to ensure that vulnerable pupils receive the support they need. The school also has effective measures in place when dealing with allegations about the conduct of staff or volunteers at school.

p.3

3

Inspectors found minor administrative errors on the single central record. These indicated that leaders and governors were unclear about some national requirements. The necessary changes were made during the inspection.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 The school does not provide teachers with enough information about exactly what pupils must know and understand in each subject. Teachers do not consistently teach key knowledge or provide relevant learning activities. They are not well placed to check exactly what pupils know and understand. As a result, pupils do not learn what leaders expect. The school must ensure that curriculum plans clarify precisely what pupils must know and understand in each subject.  The school does not ensure that pupils who find reading difficult are provided with texts that match their reading abilities. Consequently, these pupils do not get sufficient practice to master what they find hard and do not access the curriculum as effectively as they could. The school must provide texts that match weaker readers’ reading abilities.  The school does not provide staff with the information they need to arrange support that matches the specific needs of some pupils with SEND. As a result, staff do not give

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

these pupils the support they need to learn as well as they could. The school must provide staff with the guidance they need to support these pupils effectively.

p.3

Background

When we have judged a school to be good, we will then normally go into the school about once every four years to confirm that the school remains good. This is called an ungraded inspection, and it is carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. We do not give graded judgements on an ungraded inspection. However, if we find evidence that a school would now receive a higher or lower grade, then the next inspection will be a graded inspection, which is carried out under section 5 of the Act. Usually this is within one to two years of the date of the ungraded inspection. If we have serious concerns about safeguarding, behaviour or the quality of education, we will deem the ungraded inspection a graded inspection immediately. 1 November 2023

p.3

4

This is the second ungraded inspection since we judged the school to be good in September 2014.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with SEND; pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 1 November 2023

p.4

School details

Date of previous inspection 30 October 2018, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005

p.5

Information about this school

 The headteacher took up her post in September 2023.  The school has nursery provision for two-year-olds.  The school uses no alternative provision.  The school operates its own before- and after-school care.

p.5

Information about this inspection

Inspections are a point-in-time judgement about the quality of a school’s education provision.

p.5

Information about this inspection

 This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school.  Inspectors spoke with governors, a representative from the local authority, the headteacher, teachers, members of support staff, and pupils.  Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: reading, mathematics and PE. For each deep dive, inspectors held discussions about the curriculum, visited a sample of 1 November 2023

p.5

6

lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work.  Inspectors also discussed the curriculum, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work in some other subjects.  To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the inspectors: reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first.  Inspectors observed behaviour of pupils in lessons and during play time.  Inspectors looked at relevant documents, considered pupils work and held discussions with leaders, staff and pupils about the provision for pupils’ personal development.  Inspectors considered the 10 staff’s responses and the 33 parents’ responses to Ofsted’s online surveys.

p.6

Inspection team

Al Mistrano, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

Lesley Stevens Ofsted Inspector 1 November 2023

p.6

7

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion