Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
The Ongar Academy
Summary
Steve Woodley (lead), Suzanne Thrower
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
1 Nov 2023
- Inspectors verified
Steve Woodley, Suzanne Thrower
- Postcode verified
CM5 0AN
- Name on report verified
The Ongar Academy
- URN verified
141947
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The school should ensure that the plans in place to provide weaker readers with the additional support they need are implemented swiftly. p.3
- Leaders use this information to identify what pupils need to learn next. p.2
- Governors are active in checking that the school is making the progress that it should. p.2
- The school should ensure that its CEIAG programme is developed and implemented, and its effectiveness evaluated fully, so that pupils build their knowledge and experience of the world of work. p.3
- It clearly identifies what pupils need to learn and how it will build their knowledge over time. p.1
- There are clear, well-understood expectations of how pupils should behave. p.2
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Teaching & assessment3
“Teachers question pupils effectively to check pupils’ knowledge.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,271
- about usual (typical 1153)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 55, typical 55
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 6
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 3%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of a good school: The Ongar Academy Fyfield Road, Ongar, Essex CM5 0AN
p.1
Inspection dates: 31 October and 1 November 2023
p.1
Outcome
The Ongar Academy continues to be a good school.
p.1
Outcome
The headteacher of this school is Carl Wakefield. This school is part of the Bridge Academy Trust, which means other people in the trust also have responsibility for running the school. The trust is run by the chief executive officer, Mark Farmer, and overseen by a board of trustees, chaired by Keith Mogford.
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils enjoy attending The Ongar Academy. They feel increasingly positive about the school after an unsettled period. They appreciate the high expectations the school now has of behaviour. Pupils are polite, tolerant, and respectful towards each other. Most pupils behave well.
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
The school provides a high level of individual support for pupils who need it. Relationships between staff and pupils are very strong. This enables pupils who find school difficult to feel more confident and able to successfully focus on their learning. Pupils increasingly attend well.
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils develop their confidence through a range of leadership opportunities and clubs. Pupils are elected to leadership positions by their peers. They can participate in experiences that prepare them for adulthood, such as The Duke of Edinburgh’s Award scheme. There are many clubs, including drama and art. Girls and boys participate enthusiastically in a range of sports clubs. Pupils’ knowledge and understanding are enhanced by well-planned visits, including to a local castle and zoo.
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
The school is determined that all pupils, including those with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) do well. Pupils follow a curriculum that is increasingly well adapted to meet the needs of all pupils so that they can achieve well.
p.1
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
The school’s curriculum is well thought out. It clearly identifies what pupils need to learn and how it will build their knowledge over time. Subject leaders accurately check what 31 October and 1 November 2023
p.1
2
pupils know. Leaders use this information to identify what pupils need to learn next. The school is adjusting the curriculum to ensure that any gaps in knowledge are addressed so that pupils do not fall behind.
p.2
2
Teachers question pupils effectively to check pupils’ knowledge. Where it is appropriate, they provide opportunities for pupils to work independently and to discuss their ideas with each other. This develops pupils’ communication skills and builds their knowledge. Pupils receive clear feedback on their work and use it to make improvements. As a result, pupils achieve well.
p.2
2
Pupils read often. They are expected to ‘drop everything and read’. The reading curriculum teaches pupils to read well. However, due to staffing changes, there has been a delay in the school completing precise enough checks on how well pupils are able to read. This means that, for the few pupils who struggle to learn to read, they are not catching up as quickly as leaders would expect. The school is aware of this and has a secure plan in place to ensure checks are made on those pupils who are at the early stages of learning to read.
p.2
2
Teachers know the needs of pupils with SEND well and adapt their teaching to support them. Pupils with SEND are expected to take part in lessons, and support is given to ensure that they can do this successfully. As a result, pupils with SEND successfully access the same curriculum as their peers.
p.2
2
The school has focused on improving attitudes to learning through its chosen approach of ‘discipline with dignity’. Through this, pupils learn the value of politeness and treating each other with respect. There are clear, well-understood expectations of how pupils should behave. The vast majority behave well. On the occasions when some pupils do not meet expectations, they are provided with support that helps them to improve their behaviour.
p.2
2
The school has a well-considered personal, social and health education curriculum. This teaches pupils about topics such as healthy relationships, consent, managing risk and online safety. Assemblies cover important issues and events, such as Black History Month. Pupils learn about the importance of treating people who are different to them with respect. As a result, pupils say that this is a school where it is safe and normal to be different.
p.2
2
Pupils learn about a range of future opportunities. They meet employers and college representatives at a careers fair. Guidance meetings support pupils to make appropriate choices about their next steps. However, the development of careers education, information, advice and guidance (CEIAG) is at an early stage. For example, pupils do not have enough work experience opportunities or information on higher education.
p.2
2
Staff at The Ongar Academy are positive about the support they receive for their workload and training from the trust. This is developing their knowledge and skills.
p.2
2
Governors are active in checking that the school is making the progress that it should. They have successfully supported the school to improve communications and build 31 October and 1 November 2023
p.2
3
relationships with parents. This has significantly increased the confidence of the local community in the school.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
While the reading curriculum is effective, the school has not checked how well pupils learn to read. The few pupils who struggle to learn to read are not identified quickly enough. The school should ensure that the plans in place to provide weaker readers with the additional support they need are implemented swiftly. The school’s CEIAG programme does not provide pupils with enough high-quality encounters with employers and higher education providers, or with opportunities to experience the world of work. This means that pupils are not aware of the opportunities ahead of them and how to access these. The school should ensure that its CEIAG programme is developed and implemented, and its effectiveness evaluated fully, so that pupils build their knowledge and experience of the world of work.
p.3
Background
When we have judged a school to be good, we will then normally go into the school about once every four years to confirm that the school remains good. This is called an ungraded inspection, and it is carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. We do not give graded judgements on an ungraded inspection. However, if we find evidence that a school would now receive a higher or lower grade, then the next inspection will be a graded inspection, which is carried out under section 5 of the Act. Usually this is within one to two years of the date of the ungraded inspection. If we have serious concerns about safeguarding, behaviour or the quality of education, we will deem the ungraded inspection a graded inspection immediately.
p.3
Background
This is the first ungraded inspection since we judged the school to be good in May 2018.
p.3
How can I feed back my views?
find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.3
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school. 31 October and 1 November 2023
p.3
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.4
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 31 October and 1 November 2023
p.4
School details
Dates of previous inspection 16 and 17 May 2018, under section 5 of the Education Act 2005
p.5
Information about this school
All but two members of the school’s senior leadership team, including the headteacher, joined the school in September 2023. Over 80% of the teaching staff joined the school in September 2023. The school offered sixth-form provision until July 2023. The school uses six registered alternative provisions for pupils. The school is a member of the Bridge Academy Trust. The school meets the requirements of the provider access legislation, which requires schools to provide pupils in Years 8 to 13 with information and engagement about approved technical education qualifications and apprenticeships.
p.5
Information about this inspection
Inspections are a point-in-time judgement about the quality of a school’s education provision. 31 October and 1 November 2023
p.5
6
This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school. The lead inspector met with the CEO of the trust, as well as with members of the local governing body. He also spoke to the local authority school improvement partner. Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: English, mathematics, languages, and science. For each deep dive, inspectors discussed the curriculum with subject leaders, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work. Inspectors also discussed the curriculum in some other subjects and visited a range of lessons. To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the inspectors: reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered
p.6
6
the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first. Inspectors held meetings with a range of leaders, including the careers coordinator, and the special educational needs and disabilities coordinator. The lead inspector met with the early career teacher and staff involved in the induction of new teachers. Inspectors observed pupils’ behaviour in lessons and at other times around school. They met with groups of pupils to discuss behaviour in the school. The lead inspector spoke with a representative from the alternative provision used by the school. Inspectors scrutinised a range of records relating to behaviour and attendance. The lead inspector considered the 93 responses and 64 free-text responses received during the inspection to Ofsted’s online survey, Ofsted Parent View. He also considered the 37 responses to Ofsted’s staff survey. There were no responses to the
p.6
Inspection team
Steve Woodley, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector
p.6
Inspection team
Suzanne Thrower Ofsted Inspector 31 October and 1 November 2023
p.6
7
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
7
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
7
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
7
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
7
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion