Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
Gaddesden Row JMI School
Summary
Mark Sim (lead), Laura Hewer
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
19 Oct 2023
- Inspectors verified
Laura Hewer, Mark Sim
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Good
- Early years verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Personal development verified
Good
- Quality of education verified
Good
- Postcode verified
HP2 6HG
- Name on report verified
Gaddesden Row JMI School
- URN verified
117101
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2018.
- OverallGood
- Behaviour and attitudesGood
- Early yearsGood
- Leadership and managementGood
- Personal developmentGood
- Quality of educationGood
66% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (5,043 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Teachers have the subject knowledge they need to support pupils to learn to read. p.2
- Teachers have the subject knowledge they need to teach the curriculum. p.2
- The school has rightly identified the need to improve pupils’ attendance. p.3
- Leaders should ensure that staff insist that pupils realise the high aims of the school curriculum through the appropriate completion of the activities. p.3
- The school should ensure that the timely support and challenge offered to pupils and their families quickly leads to improved attendance. p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Teaching & assessment11
“Teachers adapt their teaching for pupils with SEND effectively.” p.3Leadership & governance7
“Leaders identify pupils with poor attendance.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,023
- about usual (typical 1098)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 54, typical 55
- Average sentence
- 13 words
- Next steps
- 5
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 4%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Gaddesden Row JMI School Gaddesden Row, Hemel Hempstead, Hertfordshire HP2 6HG
p.1
Inspection dates: 18 and 19 October 2023
p.1
Overall effectiveness Good
The quality of education Good Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Good Early years provision Good Previous inspection grade Good 18 and 19 October 2023
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils treasure their small and happy school. Everybody cares for each other, and this makes the school feel ‘like a family’. As a result, pupils feel happy and safe. Older pupils are patient and nurturing towards the younger pupils. At lunchtime, for example, Year 6 pupils kindly attempt to explain the rules of chess to children in Reception.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils learn the importance of respecting diversity. They embrace this. Pupils know a lot about different cultures and faiths. For example, they remembered details about Diwali and made connections to the fireworks they saw at home during the festival.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
The school has high expectations of pupils’ behaviour. Consequently, they behave well and work hard. Pupils follow teachers’ instructions carefully. They learn well across a broad range of subjects. Pupils benefit from how lessons draw them in. Teachers use clear explanations and instructions that build on what pupils already know.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils like completing various activities as a whole school. They enjoyed recent trips to the zoo and a museum in London. Pupils also enjoy a range of after-school activities. These include football and a relaxation club.
p.2
better?
The school has made significant changes to the curriculum since the last inspection.
p.2
better?
The school prioritises teaching pupils to read. As a result, the new approach is well embedded. Leaders have constructed a well-sequenced phonics curriculum, which ensures that children learn sounds quickly. This starts in the early years, where children get off to a good start with phonics. Teachers have the subject knowledge they need to support pupils to learn to read. Rigorous checking identifies any pupil who is falling behind. Additional teaching, including tutoring, supports them to catch up. As a result, pupils learn to read with confidence. Older pupils read frequently in school and at home. Teachers read to pupils daily. This helps to develop pupils’ knowledge of a range of authors.
p.2
better?
The school has ensured that the new curriculum is well thought through in all subjects. Leaders have carefully considered the challenge of the mixed-age classes. Pupils learn the same core knowledge, but activities vary according to their chronological age. For example, children in the Reception class and Year 1 learned about the life of Mary Seacole together. Afterwards, children in Year 1 accurately ordered events from her life, while children in Reception engaged in role play. Both activities allowed pupils to show what they had remembered from the lesson.
p.2
better?
Teachers have the subject knowledge they need to teach the curriculum. The school provides them with effective training. Pupils learn and progress through the different curriculum subjects well. However, where leaders have not made their expectations 18 and 19 October 2023
p.2
3
clear enough to staff, the quality of pupils’ work is too variable. Poor presentation in mathematics, for example, leads to inaccuracy in how pupils set out calculations.
p.3
3
The school has high expectations for pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). Teachers adapt their teaching for pupils with SEND effectively. These adaptations address pupils’ specific needs well. For example, scribing helps pupils to express their ideas. The school ensures that pupils with SEND learn the same curriculum alongside their peers.
p.3
3
Pupils behave well in lessons. There is little disruption to learning. Pupils quickly and independently settle to tasks as directed by the teacher. This enables teachers to direct inputs to the different ages of pupils within a class. For example, pupils in Years 5 and 6 read sensibly and independently while the teacher works with Year 4.
p.3
3
The school has rightly identified the need to improve pupils’ attendance. Leaders identify pupils with poor attendance. They meet with parents to explore what is causing this so that the school may respond. They provide high-quality pastoral support for pupils who feel anxious about attending school. Attendance is improving from a low starting point. However, there is still more work to do to reduce the number of pupils who are persistently absent.
p.3
3
The school caters well for pupils’ personal development. Older pupils undertake a variety of leadership roles within school. Pupils elect school councillors and team captains. They see these roles as important. This is because the school council makes decisions that have a direct impact upon the pupils. For example, the school council recently selected some additional playground equipment.
p.3
3
The governing body knows the school well. It has a good grasp of its statutory and broader responsibilities. The governing body acts as custodians of the school and plays an active role in school life.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
Sometimes, leaders and staff do not have high enough expectations. Checks on pupils’ recorded work can lack rigour. As a result, some pupils are not set up for success, leading to pupils making avoidable mistakes. Leaders should ensure that staff insist that pupils realise the high aims of the school curriculum through the appropriate completion of the activities. Though attendance is improving, there remains a proportion of pupils who do not attend school frequently enough. This creates gaps in pupils’ knowledge and 18 and 19 October 2023
p.3
4
understanding. The school should ensure that the timely support and challenge offered to pupils and their families quickly leads to improved attendance.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.4
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 18 and 19 October 2023
p.4
School details
Appropriate authority The governing body
p.5
School details
Date of previous inspection 6 February 2018, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005
p.5
Information about this school
The school offers before-school childcare for its pupils, which is run by school staff and managed by the governing body. The school does not make use of any alternative provision. The school arranges pupils into three mixed-age classes: the Reception class and Year 1; Years 2 and 3; and Years 4, 5 and 6.
p.5
Information about this inspection
The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.5
Information about this inspection
Inspections are a point-in-time judgement about the quality of a school’s education provision. This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school. 18 and 19 October 2023
p.5
6
The inspectors met with leaders, including the headteacher and deputy headteacher. The lead inspector also met with a representative from the local authority. The inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: early reading, mathematics and art. For each deep dive, the inspectors met with subject leaders, scrutinised curriculum documentation, visited lessons, spoke to teachers, talked to pupils about their learning and looked at pupils’ work. The lead inspector also listened to a sample of pupils read to a familiar adult. To further inspect the curriculum, inspectors met with headteacher and deputy headteacher to look at geography and science. They reviewed curriculum documentation and sampled pupils’ work. The inspectors met with leaders responsible for safeguarding and looked at safeguarding records, staff training logs and the single central record of recruitment and vetting checks. Inspectors reviewed a range of school documentation, including the school
p.6
6
development plan, self-evaluation form and reports to the governing body. The inspectors held discussions with pupils, including in lessons and during breaktimes. Inspectors also reviewed the 30 responses to Ofsted’s pupil survey. To gather the views of staff, the inspectors took account of the 11 responses to Ofsted’s staff survey and held discussions with several of them. The inspectors considered the 27 responses, including 22 free-text responses, to the Parent survey, Ofsted Parent View.
p.6
Inspection team
Mark Sim, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector
p.6
Inspection team
Laura Hewer Ofsted Inspector 18 and 19 October 2023
p.6
7
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
7
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
7
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
7
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
7
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion