Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Marsden Heights Community College

Inspected 4 Oct 2023 · published 27 Nov 2023 · URN 146276

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    4 Oct 2023

  • Inspectors verified

    Chris Beard, David Roberts, Eleanor Overland, Phill Walmsley

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Quality of education verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    BB9 0PR

  • Name on report verified

    Marsden Heights Community College

  • URN verified

    146276

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallGood
  • Behaviour and attitudesGood
  • Leadership and managementGood
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Quality of educationGood

66% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (5,043 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+78Very positivemore positive than 88% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseambitioushigh expectationsenjoyproudeffectivestronghappysecure knowledge
Criticismdisruptionnot cleargaps

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings891w+76
  • Safeguarding288w+51

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,161
about usual (typical 1098)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 50, typical 55
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
4
typical 4
Hedged sentences
17%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 51%Safeguarding 17%About the inspection 32%

Full report text

Inspection of Marsden Heights Community College Edge End Lane, Nelson, Lancashire BB9 0PR

p.1

Overall effectiveness Good

The quality of education Good Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Good

p.1

Overall effectiveness Good

Previous inspection grade Not previously inspected under section 5 of the Education Act 2005

p.1

Overall effectiveness Good

The headteacher of this school is Alyson Littlewood. The school is part of the United Learning trust, which means other people in the trust also have responsibility for running the school. The trust is run by the chief executive officer, Jon Coles, and overseen by a board of trustees, chaired by Reena Keeble. 3 and 4 October 2023

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils feel happy and safe at this friendly and welcoming school. They spoke enthusiastically about how they champion the diversity of their school community. For example, pupils explained that various flags decorate learning spaces to reflect the different backgrounds and cultures of pupils. Pupils and staff are immensely proud of the improvements made to this school in recent years.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

The school has high expectations of pupils’ learning and behaviour. Pupils, including pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND), benefit from learning the same ambitious curriculum. Pupils enjoy their lessons and work hard. They achieve well in many subjects.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Most pupils attend school regularly and engage with their learning enthusiastically. For example, pupils appreciate the opportunity to attend school on Saturdays for additional events, including revision classes and rehearsals for the school show.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils enjoy the wider opportunities on offer to them, such as hill climbing in the local area. They take part in a range of clubs and activities. For example, pupils play in sports teams and get involved in a range of arts and crafts. Pupils and staff also work closely with the local community, including raising money for local charities.

p.2

better?

With the support of the trust, the school has designed an ambitious curriculum across all subject areas. Where subjects are firmly established, pupils achieve well. In a small number of subjects, the school’s curriculum thinking is at an earlier stage. In these subjects, some pupils’ outcomes do not reflect the more recent improvements made to the curriculum. This includes for a small number of subjects in the English Baccalaureate suite of subjects.

p.2

better?

Teachers have secure knowledge of the subjects they teach, and they explain concepts clearly to pupils. Overall, teachers design appropriate activities to help pupils build and remember essential knowledge over time. The school has adopted effective routines that teachers use consistently. As a result, pupils know what is expected of them, and learning time is used efficiently.

p.2

better?

In many subjects, teachers skilfully check what pupils know and remember. In these subjects, pupils’ misconceptions are identified and remedied quickly. In subjects where teachers are in the process of defining the essential knowledge that they want pupils to learn, the school’s approaches to assessment are underdeveloped. Occasionally, teachers are not clear enough about where pupils have gaps in their knowledge.

p.2

better?

The school prioritises reading for all pupils. Teachers read regularly with their classes, and they are trained well in the reading strategies that they model. Pupils said that these reading strategies help them to access the ambitious texts that 3 and 4 October 2023

p.2

3

teachers have selected for them. Pupils told inspectors that they enjoy reading. For example, they visit the school library often, and many pupils read regularly in their own time.

p.3

3

Skilled staff are quick to identify those pupils who find reading more difficult. Staff use their expertise to provide timely and appropriate support so that these pupils can catch up with their peers.

p.3

3

The school identifies pupils with SEND swiftly and accurately. Teachers are furnished with the information and training that they need to support pupils with SEND well. However, in a small number of subjects, some teachers do not adapt their delivery of the curriculum as effectively as they could to meet pupils’ additional needs. Occasionally, some pupils with SEND do not achieve as well as they should in these subjects.

p.3

3

Pupils readily meet the school’s high expectations of their behaviour. In lessons and around the school site, pupils are courteous, and they treat each other with respect. Disruption to learning is rare, and pupils are proud of the rewards that they receive for behaving well.

p.3

3

Many pupils are positive about the experiences that the school provides to enhance their wider personal development, and they recognise the importance of this learning. For example, pupils have learned about a range of topics that suitably prepare them for life in modern Britain and help them to consider future careers. However, some aspects of the school’s careers education are less well thought out. Some pupils told inspectors that that they do not receive sufficient information about post-16 choices until late into key stage 4. From time to time, this hinders some pupils from making informed decisions about their next steps.

p.3

3

Governors and trustees work together closely and understand the school’s priorities for further improvement well. Staff value the professional development opportunities that the trust provides. The school, with the support of the trust, seeks the views of staff before making changes or introducing new initiatives. Staff are appreciative of this support for their well-being and workload.

p.3

3

Parents and carers appreciate the strong communication that they have with the school. For example, parents told inspectors that they feel fully informed about how well their children are learning.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

4

 In a few subjects, the school is finalising the knowledge that it wants pupils to learn. This sometimes hinders teachers in checking how well pupils have secured the knowledge that they require for subsequent learning. The school should ensure that, as these curriculums are finalised, teachers are equipped to identify and address pupils’ misconceptions before they move on to new learning.  The school does not ensure that some pupils receive timely enough information about their next steps. This hinders some pupils from being fully informed about the extent of opportunities available to them when making post-16 choices. The school should ensure that the programme of careers education is designed to prepare pupils sufficiently well to make considered decisions about the next stage of their education, employment or training.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 3 and 4 October 2023

p.4

School details

Number of pupils on the school roll 1,040

p.5

Information about this school

 The school is part of the United Learning multi-academy trust.  The school makes use of two registered alternative providers for a small number of pupils.  The school meets the requirements of the provider access legislation, which requires schools to provide pupils in Years 8 to 13 with information and engagement about approved technical education qualifications and apprenticeships.

p.5

Information about this inspection

The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.5

Information about this inspection

 Inspections are a point-in-time judgement about the quality of a school’s education provision.  This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school. 3 and 4 October 2023

p.5

6

 Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: English, mathematics, science, history, geography, design and technology, and art and design. For each deep dive, inspectors discussed the curriculum with subject leaders, visited a sample of lessons, spoke with teachers and pupils, and looked at samples of pupils’ work.  Inspectors spoke with the headteacher, other senior leaders, subject leaders and members of staff. The lead inspector met with the chair of the local governing body and representatives of the trust.  The lead inspector spoke with a regional director of the multi-academy trust and a representative of the local authority.  Inspectors spoke to groups of pupils from Years 7 to 11 about their experiences of school and their views on behaviour and bullying. Inspectors also observed pupils’ behaviour during lessons and at breaktimes.  To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, inspectors: reviewed the single

p.6

6

central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first.  Inspectors considered the responses to Ofsted Parent View, including the free- text comments.  Inspectors also considered the responses to Ofsted’s online surveys for staff and pupils.

p.6

Inspection team

Eleanor Overland, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

Phill Walmsley Ofsted Inspector 3 and 4 October 2023

p.6

7

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion