Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)
Children's Home run by Esland North Limited in Wiltshire
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Group verified
Esland North Limited
- Inspection date verified
11 Oct 2023
- Inspectors verified
Sarah Sheffield
- Helped and protected verified
Requires improvement to be good
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement to be good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement to be good
- Name on report verified
2519260
- URN verified
2519260
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2023.
- OverallRI to be good
- Helped and protectedRI to be good
- Leadership and managementRI to be good
13% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement to be good (12,716 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement to be good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- One professional commented, ‘The communication and teamwork around moving one child on has been excellent.’ p.5
- However, there are no serious or widespread failures that result in their welfare not being safeguarded or promoted. p.1
- On some occasions, leaders and managers took strong and decisive action in relation to keeping children safe. p.4
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Children do not always receive a consistent approach from staff to support them to understand the impact of poor behaviour. p.4
- Children have experienced a lack of stability due to the changes of managers and inconsistent staffing. p.3
- Staff have tried to calm the situation down, but this is not always successful. p.4
- For some incidents, it is not clear what has happened, and there are gaps in the information. p.4
- Leadership and management of the home has been weak since the previous inspection. p.4
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- In particular, the registered person should ensure robust plans are in place for when children go missing from the home, and that staff take effective action to look for children when they are absent from the home without consent. 20 November p.6
- The registered person should ensure that staff are supported to understand the importance of therapeutic and nurturing care, including the use of consequences and importance of accessing shared areas within the home. p.7
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Parents & families3
“Feedback from professionals and family members is positive.” p.5
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 9
- Words of findings
- 1,672
- about usual (typical 1899)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 59, typical 50
- Average sentence
- 14 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 10%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection report children’s home: 2519260 1 Registered provider: Esland North Limited Full inspection Inspected under the social care common inspection framework
p.1
Information about this children’s home
This home is registered to care for three children who have emotional and social needs. At the time of this inspection, no children were living in the home.
p.1
Information about this children’s home
The registered manager resigned in January 2023. A new manager was in post but did not submit an application to register and subsequently left their role. The manager who resigned in January 2023 is now back in post. They have submitted an application to register.
p.1
Overall experiences and progress of
children and young people, taking into account
p.1
requires improvement to be good
How well children and young people are helped and protected requires improvement to be good
p.1
requires improvement to be good
The effectiveness of leaders and managers requires improvement to be good
p.1
requires improvement to be good
The children’s home is not yet delivering good help and care for children and young people. However, there are no serious or widespread failures that result in their welfare not being safeguarded or promoted.
p.1
requires improvement to be good
Date of last inspection: 17 January 2023
p.1
requires improvement to be good
Overall judgement at last inspection: good
p.1
requires improvement to be good
Enforcement action since last inspection: none Inspection report for children’s home: 2519260 2
p.1
Inspection date Inspection type Inspection judgement
17/01/2023 Full Good 19/10/2021 Full Good 29/10/2019 Full Good Inspection report for children’s home: 2519260 3
p.2
improvement to be good
The progress of children is mixed. In some areas, children make good progress, but this is not consistent. For example, children do not always have consistent boundaries in place to help them make progress. Children have experienced a lack of stability due to the changes of managers and inconsistent staffing. This has impacted on their experiences and progress.
p.3
improvement to be good
Two children have moved out, as leaders and managers assessed that their needs were no longer best met in this home. Staff supported both children to move on positively. They keep in touch with one child who had lived at the home for nine years.
p.3
improvement to be good
The quality of the environment varies. In some areas, such as the kitchen and lounge the home is well-presented and homely. However, other parts of the home are damaged and require repairs. The manager has plans for this work to be complete before a new child moves into the home.
p.3
improvement to be good
Children have good access to education. One child returned to school after not attending for several years. Another child completed their GCSE exams. When children are not in school, they are given educational activities to complete at home. Staff support children to develop skills so they can move on successfully. One child learned to use public transport, staff helped them to write their CV and apply for employment and apprenticeships.
p.3
improvement to be good
Children are offered healthy food to eat and are encouraged to lead a healthy lifestyle. Children are encouraged to take part in a range of activities with staff. One child enjoyed going on holiday with staff. One child enjoyed playing rugby in the local area. Another child completed a bike ride with staff to raise money for charity
p.3
improvement to be good
Staff regularly talk to children. Children’s wishes and views are heard and understood. Discussions with children are meaningful, and these conversations are helpful. One child said, ‘I like the team. I would not change anything; it is actually alright. I feel much better about it than when I first came.’
p.3
improvement to be good
Staff regularly communicate with professionals and family members to support children and advocate for them. Managers challenged the social worker when they were concerned for the safety of a child. They worked well with one local authority to enable a child to remain in the home while an alternative home was sought for them. They supported children to have positive moves to another setting. Inspection report for children’s home: 2519260 4
p.3
improvement to be good
Staff have worked hard through a difficult period where children were unsettled and there was no registered manager in place. During this time, children’s relationships with each other deteriorated. Some serious incidents occurred. The new manager and staff helped children to feel more settled, so they were able to move onto their new homes positively.
p.4
improvement to be good
There have been some incidents when children have tried to hurt one another or made threats to hurt others. Staff have appropriately intervened to keep children safe. Staff have tried to calm the situation down, but this is not always successful. Staff try to talk to children after each incident has happened.
p.4
improvement to be good
The recording of significant incidents is not always detailed or clear enough. For some incidents, it is not clear what has happened, and there are gaps in the information. This leaves managers unable to clearly assess the quality of care and ensure children are effectively safeguarded.
p.4
improvement to be good
Staff have written guidance about how to manage any potential risk and keep children safe. These documents are clear and thorough. They incorporate risks in different areas and are kept up to date. However, staff have not consistently followed these.
p.4
improvement to be good
Children do not always receive a consistent approach from staff to support them to understand the impact of poor behaviour. Staff do not manage children’s behaviour well. The routines and boundaries in place are not consistent. Some consequences are punitive, and they do not enable children to learn from their experiences.
p.4
improvement to be good
On some occasions, leaders and managers took strong and decisive action in relation to keeping children safe. However, this was not consistent. For example, on one occasion, staff did not take thorough action to search for a child who was missing from home at night. On other occasions, staff did act promptly to look for children when they were missing. They spoke to people in the community and family members to try and locate children.
p.4
improvement to be good
When safeguarding concerns are identified, they are reported promptly to social workers. This is in line with procedures. Staff talk to children openly about worries for their safety. There is good communication between staff and social workers, who receive regular updates about children. When incidents do occur, there is prompt communication with other agencies to resolve these issues.
p.4
good
Leadership and management of the home has been weak since the previous inspection. There has been an unsettled period, due to changes of managers and a lack of experienced leadership. The registered manager left her post in January Inspection report for children’s home: 2519260 5 2023. A new manager was appointed however did not submit an application to register and resigned. The previous registered manager has returned to the company and is back in the manager post. They submitted an application to register on 9 October 2023.
p.4
good
Monitoring and review systems are not consistent or effective. This impedes leaders ability to identify shortfalls and improve. Managers have now taken action to address these weaknesses and ensure these systems are more effective.
p.5
good
Staff shared with the inspector that morale was low when they did not have an experienced manager in place. On some occasions, staff reported feeling tired and unsupported. They have said that this is now improving with the new manager in place.
p.5
good
Several members of staff have left the home, and new staff members have been recruited. Staff feel reassured about the future of the home and the plans that are in place. They have benefited from intensive training that has been offered in preparation for a new child moving in. There is now a range of skills and experience in the staff team. This will enable staff to work positively with a new child in different ways.
p.5
good
The manager has gathered information and completed robust plans to prepare for a new child moving in. A thorough risk assessment has been completed, and the staff have been offered training and support to help prepare them. The manager has thought carefully about how to welcome this child. She has purchased new bedding, learning books, sensory toys and equipment to help welcome this child.
p.5
good
The manager recognises what works well in the home and what needs to change. The manager understands the areas that require improvement and has communicated this to staff. There are good levels of evaluation and reflection that enable staff to learn from recent events. Research and learning is used in team meetings to improve staff practice. Staff now understand their roles in the home and what needs to change for things to improve.
p.5
good
The manager has already taken effective steps to advocate for children, and when something is not right has challenged professionals appropriately. One professional commented, ‘The communication and teamwork around moving one child on has been excellent.’
p.5
good
Feedback from professionals and family members is positive. They describe good communication between them and the manager. One social worker said, ‘The new manager really knows what a good home looks like; she takes pride in this. I would highly recommend this home whilst she is the manager. She has already shown great commitment to this home.’ Inspection report for children’s home: 2519260 6
p.5
Statutory requirements
This section sets out the actions that the registered person(s) must take to meet the Care Standards Act 2000, The Children’s Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the ‘Guide to the Children’s Homes Regulations, including the quality standards’. The registered person(s) must comply within the given timescales.
p.6
Requirement Due date
The protection of children standard is that children are protected from harm and enabled to keep themselves safe.
p.6
Requirement Due date
In particular, the standard in paragraph (1) requires the registered person to ensure—
p.6
Requirement Due date
assess whether each child is at risk of harm, taking into account information in the child’s relevant plans, and, if necessary, make arrangements to reduce the risk of any harm to the child. (Regulation 12 (1) (2)(a)(i))
p.6
Requirement Due date
In particular, the registered person should ensure robust plans are in place for when children go missing from the home, and that staff take effective action to look for children when they are absent from the home without consent. 20 November
p.6
Requirement Due date
The leadership and management standard is that the registered person enables, inspires and leads a culture in relation to the children’s home that—
p.6
Requirement Due date
helps the children to achieve their full potential;
p.6
Requirement Due date
In particular, the standard in paragraph 1 requires the registered person to—
p.6
Requirement Due date
lead and manage the home in a way that is consistent with the approach and ethos, and delivers the outcomes, set out in the home’s statement of purpose;
p.6
Requirement Due date
use monitoring and review systems to make continuous improvements in the quality of care provided in the home. (Regulation 13 (1)(a)(b) (2)(a)(h)) 20 November Inspection report for children’s home: 2519260 7
p.6
Recommendation
The registered person should ensure that staff are supported to understand the importance of therapeutic and nurturing care, including the use of consequences and importance of accessing shared areas within the home. (‘Guide to the Children’s Homes Regulations, including the quality standards’, page 15, paragraph 3.7)
p.7
Information about this inspection
Inspectors have looked closely at the experiences and progress of children and young people, using the social care common inspection framework’ This inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service, how it meets the core functions of the service as set out in legislation, and to consider how well it complies with The Children’s Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the ‘Guide to the Children’s Homes Regulations, including the quality standards’. Inspection report for children’s home: 2519260 8
p.7
Children’s home details
Registered provider: Esland North Limited
p.8
Children’s home details
Registered provider address: Suite 1 & 5, Riverside Business Centre, Foundry Lane, Milford, Belper, DE56 0RN
p.8
Inspector
Sarah Sheffield, Social Care Inspector Inspection report for children’s home: 2519260 9 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.8
Inspector
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.9
Inspector
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.9
Inspector
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.9
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion