Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Erpingham Voluntary Controlled Church of England Primary School

Inspected 11 Oct 2023 · published 24 Nov 2023 · URN 121036

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Requires improvement

Andrew Hemmings (lead), Lynsey Holzer

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    11 Oct 2023

  • Inspectors verified

    Andrew Hemmings, Lynsey Holzer

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Good

  • Early years verified

    Requires improvement

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Quality of education verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    NR11 7QY

  • Name on report verified

    Erpingham Voluntary Controlled Church of England Primary School

  • URN verified

    121036

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2018.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Behaviour and attitudesGood
  • Early yearsRequires improvement
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Quality of educationRequires improvement

15% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (5,043 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+4Mixedmore positive than 27% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseenjoysafestrongstrengthengagingsuccessfulpositivewell supported
Criticismworryinglimiteddo not knowinsufficientweakerlacknot strongstruggle

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1061w+1
  • Safeguarding6w+33
  • What needs to improve33w—

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,063
about usual (typical 1215)
Reading level
Plain English
Flesch 65, typical 56
Average sentence
14 words
Next steps
6
typical 5
Hedged sentences
11%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 61%Safeguarding 0%What needs to improve 2%About the inspection 37%

Full report text

Inspection of Erpingham Voluntary Controlled Church of England Primary School School Road, Erpingham, Norwich, Norfolk NR11 7QY

p.1

Inspection dates: 10 and 11 October 2023

p.1

Overall effectiveness Requires improvement

The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Requires improvement Early years provision Requires improvement Previous inspection grade Good School 10 and 11 October 2023

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

This is a friendly and welcoming school where pupils treat each other well. They respect each other’s differences and play kindly together in their free time.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils enjoy school. They know they can talk to an adult in school if something is worrying them. This is an important part of the open culture which keeps them safe.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

The many unusual aspects of this school are welcomed by parents and pupils. For example, pupils relish the unusually high amount of time that they spend outdoors. This helps them develop aspects of their character such as perseverance and resilience. Pupils learn to take risks and to keep themselves safe.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils are nurtured by the school and develop well personally. However, despite the school wanting them to do well, pupils do not learn as much as they should. Their progress in reading and a range of other subjects is limited by some aspects of curriculum design and teaching.

p.2

better?

In some subjects, the school sets out the detail of what teachers should teach and when. In others, there is insufficient detail for teachers to work from. Pupils learn what teachers decide they should learn, not what the school has decided is most important.

p.2

better?

In many subjects, the school does not make sure pupils revisit the most important parts of what they have been taught. Nor does the school check whether pupils have remembered these. Leaders and teachers do not know if, or make sure that, pupils have learned what was intended. Pupils do learn, but not as well as they should.

p.2

better?

These weaker aspects of provision are evident from Reception to Year 6. Provision in the pre-school is a strength. Children quickly settle and learn the considered pre- school curriculum. Adults have a strong understanding of children’s starting points and know the curriculum well. Adults are expert listeners, engaging in meaningful talk with children. Children are prepared well for the transition to Reception.

p.2

better?

Pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) are supported well in some ways. For example, those pupils whose needs make it difficult for them to concentrate are helped to listen and learn. However, the school does not adapt what pupils are taught well enough. Some pupils with SEND struggle to understand the work they are given. They do not make consistently strong progress.

p.2

better?

The school’s approach to teaching phonics is not working as well as it should. Adults do not adhere closely to the approach that accompanies the school’s chosen scheme. They teach pupils incorrect facts about sounds and how to pronounce them. Adults do not ensure pupils learn to practise sounds well. Pupils do not learn School 10 and 11 October 2023

p.2

3

to read as quickly and well as they should. While some pupils learn to enjoy reading, others do not.

p.3

3

The school’s approach to pupils’ personal development is successful. The personal, social and health education (PSHE) programme is enhanced by thoughtful outdoor learning and opportunities to work with other organisations such as the Environment Agency. There are many visits that support what pupils learn and help them to gain a broad understanding of the world. A wide range of clubs, such as baking and crochet, are on offer and popular with pupils. Leaders work well to make sure all pupils, including those with SEND, take part in these aspects of school life.

p.3

3

The school helps pupils learn how to stay safe and how to treat others. This is reflected in pupils’ positive attitudes and behaviours around the school. At lunchtime, they participate in a variety of activities, getting on well together. Pupils also usually behave well in lessons.

p.3

3

Staff feel well supported by leaders. Parents value the school’s work and the uniqueness it brings. Working with the local authority, leaders and governors have strengthened leadership. The school now works in a broader partnership than it did in the past. This brings opportunities to share expertise and allows leaders to focus more on their core work. However, this very recent development has, at this early stage, had limited impact.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 The school has not set out well the content pupils need to learn in some subjects. As a result, what pupils learn is left too much to chance. The school should set out clearly which knowledge pupils need to learn in order to develop a cohesive body of knowledge in all subjects.  The school does not adapt teaching to ensure pupils with SEND can access the same curriculum content as their peers. This means that pupils with SEND do not learn as well as they should. The school should ensure that the way the curriculum is taught meets the needs of all pupils.  Phonics is taught inaccurately and with a lack of adherence to the phonics scheme. Pupils do not learn to read as quickly and well as they should. The school should ensure all staff who teach phonics have the expertise to do so and teach it in accordance with the school’s chosen scheme.  The school does not go back to previously taught knowledge often enough.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

Adults do not know, or ensure pupils have learned, key knowledge in the long term. The school should ensure there are opportunities for pupils to revisit important knowledge and for teachers to check pupils have remembered it. School 10 and 11 October 2023

p.3

How can I feed back my views?

or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). School 10 and 11 October 2023

p.4

School details

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.5

School details

Headteacher John Neenan (Executive Headteacher)

p.5

School details

Date of previous inspection 14 March 2018, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005

p.5

Information about this school

 The school is part of Blue Sky Federation with Nortrepps Primary School. The schools share the same governing body.  Both schools have recently begun to work in partnership with St Michael’s Church of England VA Primary and Nursery School. Since 5 June 2023, the headteacher of St Michael’s has led all three schools.  The school provides education for pupils from the age of two.  The school does not make use of any alternative provision.  Erpingham Church of England Voluntary Controlled Primary School has a Christian character. The religious aspects of the school’s provision were last inspected in July 2017 under section 48 of the Education Act, 2005. The next section 48 inspection will be within eight school years.  The school runs before- and after-school clubs for its pupils.

p.5

Information about this inspection

The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005. School 10 and 11 October 2023

p.5

6

 Inspections are a point-in-time judgement about the quality of a school’s education provision.  This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school.  Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: early reading, mathematics, art and history. For each deep dive, inspectors held discussions about the curriculum, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work.  Inspectors also spoke with leaders and considered curriculum documentation for geography, modern foreign languages, physical education and PSHE.  Inspectors met with the executive headteacher, the deputy headteacher and other leaders.  The lead inspector met with two governors, including the chair, a representative

p.6

6

of the local authority and a representative of the diocese.  To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, inspectors reviewed the single central record of recruitment checks; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first.  Inspectors met with pupils and staff, as well as reviewed their responses to Ofsted’s surveys of their views.  Inspectors considered the responses to Ofsted’s survey, Ofsted Parent View, as well as the free-text comments parents made and the one communication sent directly to Ofsted from a parent.

p.6

Inspection team

Andrew Hemmings, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

Lynsey Holzer Ofsted Inspector School 10 and 11 October 2023

p.6

7

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion