Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

St Michael and All Angels Catholic Primary School

Inspected 5 Oct 2023 · published 17 Nov 2023 · URN 104464

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Requires improvement

Steve Bentham (lead), David Woodhouse, Madeline Muldoon

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    5 Oct 2023

  • Inspectors verified

    David Woodhouse, Madeline Muldoon, Steve Bentham

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Good

  • Early years verified

    Inadequate

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Quality of education verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    L32 0TP

  • Name on report verified

    St Michael and All Angels Catholic Primary School

  • URN verified

    104464

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2013.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Behaviour and attitudesGood
  • Early yearsInadequate
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Quality of educationRequires improvement

15% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (5,043 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+37Positivemore positive than 74% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisepositiveeffectiveoutstandingenjoyhigh expectationsconsistentlysuccessfullystrong
Criticismpoorlylow expectationsweaknessesnot sufficientlylacksnot strongnot effectivenot well prepared

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1201w+33
  • Safeguarding6w+33
  • What needs to improve102w+50

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,275
about usual (typical 1215)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 56, typical 56
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
15%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 63%Safeguarding 0%What needs to improve 5%About the inspection 32%

Full report text

Inspection of St Michael and All Angels Catholic Primary School Sidney Powell Avenue, Westvale, Kirkby, Liverpool, Merseyside L32 0TP

p.1

Overall effectiveness Requires improvement

The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Requires improvement Early years provision Inadequate Previous inspection grade Outstanding

p.1

Overall effectiveness Requires improvement

This school was last inspected under section 5 of the Education Act 2005 10 years ago and judged ‘Outstanding’ under a previous inspection framework. This reflected the school’s overall effectiveness under the inspection framework in use at the time.

p.1

Overall effectiveness Requires improvement

From then until November 2020, the school was exempted by law from routine inspection, so there has been a longer gap than usual between graded inspections under section 5 of the Act. 4 and 5 October 2023

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils are happy at school. Older pupils are positive about the difference that they make to the school community through their responsibilities. For example, some pupils are trained as peer mentors and resolve any small playground incidents before staff need to get involved. Pupils behave well. They are warm hearted and respect each other’s differences. Pupils are supportive of one another and understand what it means to be a good friend.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils enjoy learning. They have positive attitudes towards school. The school has high expectations for most pupils in key stages 1 and 2. However, the arrangements to support pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) do not help these pupils to achieve as well as they should. In addition, the school has not ensured that the provision in early years consistently meets children’s learning needs. A poorly designed curriculum and low expectations for children’s learning mean that children are not sufficiently prepared for the next stages in their education.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils enjoy a range of visiting speakers who add to the curriculum. For example, visitors help pupils to create films and to learn about Shakespearean plays. Pupils build an awareness of their own health and safety. They have opportunities to develop their future aspirations and understanding of different careers.

p.2

better?

In most subjects, the school has designed a curriculum that successfully defines the most important knowledge that pupils should learn and when this should happen. The school provides staff with effective support to deliver the curriculum well for most pupils. Staff know how to address pupils’ misconceptions to reinforce their learning. Although the school identifies the needs of pupils with SEND well, it has not put in place appropriate adaptations to ensure that these pupils can access the curriculum. This means that some pupils with SEND do not achieve as well as they should.

p.2

better?

Some subjects are at different stages of development. The school does not have effective arrangements to check on the quality of some subject curriculums. In these subjects, teachers do not identify gaps in pupils’ knowledge well enough. The school does not provide staff with the information that they need to improve some aspects of pupils’ learning as quickly as they should.

p.2

better?

Staff in the early years care for children well. This includes helping children to manage their own feelings and behaviour. Children respond well to staff as a result of these positive relationships. However, the school has not ensured that staff implement an effective early years curriculum that meets all children’s learning needs. The activities that staff provide do not follow children’s interests or build on what children already know and can do. This means that children’s play lacks 4 and 5 October 2023

p.2

3

purpose. Children lose engagement in their learning and often flit from one activity to another.

p.3

3

In reading, the school has ensured that staff deliver the phonics curriculum consistently well. Staff pronounce sounds correctly. This helps children in the early years to blend sounds together to make simple words. In key stage 1, pupils are given books which carefully match their current phonics knowledge. Pupils practise their reading often. This helps most pupils to achieve well in reading. However, as in other subjects, the expectations for some pupils with SEND are not as high as they should be. These pupils do not have the opportunities that they need to catch up with their reading quickly enough.

p.3

3

Pupils behave well in lessons and are keen to learn. Staff act quickly to make sure that any potential disruptions do not make a difference to pupils’ learning. Pupils focus on their work well. They are polite and pleasant with visitors and with one another.

p.3

3

The school ensures that pupils are well prepared for life in modern Britain. They have a strong understanding of other faiths. Staff provide opportunities for pupils to discuss moral dilemmas, such as how to deal with peer pressure. Pupils also have opportunities to debate relevant current affairs, such as the effects of social media. The school develops pupils’ understanding of equality well. Pupils exhibit this in their daily interactions with each other.

p.3

3

Governors have not ensured that the education provided by the school has a positive impact on all its pupils. They have not done enough to stabilise the school during a time of turbulence in staffing. Governors and the school have not provided the support needed for the workload of staff who have taken on additional responsibilities. This has led to weaknesses in the quality of education, particularly for pupils with SEND and children in the early years.

p.3

3

The school develops effective relationships with parents and carers by providing them with information about how to help their children’s learning at home. Parents commented positively on the kind and caring nature of staff.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 Some pupils with SEND are not provided with the support that they need to learn the intended curriculum, including phonics. As such, they do not read as well as they should. The school should ensure that these pupils are provided with more 4 and 5 October 2023

p.3

4

focused support to practise applying their knowledge so that they quickly catch up with their learning.  In the early years, the curriculum that the school has put in place is poorly designed and implemented. As such, the activities that children undertake do not help them to learn. Children are not well prepared for the next stages in their education. Leaders must urgently ensure that staff successfully implement an effective early years curriculum so that children know and remember more.  The school has not put in place strong enough measures to quality assure the curriculum in some subjects. As a result, gaps in pupils’ knowledge are not addressed as quickly as they should be. The school should implement stronger measures to help staff to best support pupils’ learning.  Governors have not challenged or supported the school well enough during the recent turbulence in staffing. As such, there is variability in the quality of

p.4

4

education, particularly for pupils with SEND and for children in the early years. Governors should ensure that they have a more accurate picture about what needs improving to support the school to bring about positive change.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 4 and 5 October 2023

p.4

School details

Local authority Knowsley Metropolitan Borough Council

p.5

School details

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.5

School details

Dates of previous inspection 30 and 31 October 2013, under section 5 of the Education Act 2005

p.5

Information about this school

 Since the previous inspection, nine new governors have started in their roles.  A significant number of teachers have left since the previous inspection. New staff have been recruited to these roles.  The school makes use of one alternative provider for some pupils.  This is a Roman Catholic primary school. The last section 48 inspection, for schools of a religious character, took place in March 2019. In line with the revised schedule for these inspections, governors have appropriate arrangements with the archdiocese to make sure that the next inspection will take place by 2027.

p.5

Information about this inspection

The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.5

Information about this inspection

 Inspections are a point-in-time judgement about the quality of a school’s education provision. 4 and 5 October 2023

p.5

6

 This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with leaders and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school.  Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: early reading, mathematics, science, art and design and history. For each deep dive, the inspectors discussed the curriculum with subject leaders, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work. They also heard pupils read individually and as part of classroom activities.  The inspectors also spoke to leaders about the curriculum in other subjects and spoke with pupils about their work in these subjects.  Inspectors took account of the responses to Ofsted Parent View, including the free-text comments.  Inspectors also considered the responses to the Ofsted surveys for staff and

p.6

6

pupils.  Inspectors observed pupils’ behaviour during lessons, at breaktimes and around the school. They discussed behaviour and bullying with pupils, leaders and other staff.  Inspectors spoke with pupils and leaders about the provision in place for pupils’ personal development.  To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the inspectors: reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first.

p.6

Inspection team

Steve Bentham, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

Madeline Muldoon Ofsted Inspector 4 and 5 October 2023

p.6

7

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion