Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
Park Junior School
Summary
Dale Burr (lead), Nicola Berry
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
4 Oct 2023
- Inspectors verified
Dale Burr, Nicola Berry
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement
- Personal development verified
Good
- Quality of education verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
GL10 2NP
- Name on report verified
Park Junior School
- URN verified
115539
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2019.
- OverallRequires improvement
- Behaviour and attitudesGood
- Leadership and managementGood
- Personal developmentGood
- Quality of educationRequires improvement
15% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (5,043 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- As a result, too many weaker readers do not gain the knowledge they need to become confident and fluent readers. p.3
- It now identifies the essential knowledge pupils need to learn. p.2
- The school needs to ensure that all staff understand how to tailor learning so that pupils build knowledge securely across all subjects. p.3
- The school should strengthen the checking of processes so that it can gather and evaluate the impact of the curriculum on pupils’ learning. p.3
- The school must ensure that the agreed approach to teaching phonics is used consistently well so that pupils catch up rapidly. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Teaching & assessment6
“Teachers know what effective learning looks like.” p.3Leadership & governance2
“Executive leaders have brought about positive change.” p.2Parents & families2
“Many parents praise the school’s work.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 971
- shorter than usual (typical 1215)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 57, typical 56
- Average sentence
- 13 words
- Next steps
- 5
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 8%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Park Junior School Elm Road, Stonehouse, Gloucestershire GL10 2NP
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Good Previous inspection grade Requires improvement 3 and 4 October 2023
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Park Juniors is an improving school. Staff want pupils to do well. Executive leaders have brought about positive change. Expectations of pupils are now much higher than before. However, many improvements are in their infancy. They still need time to become fully embedded.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils are friendly and polite. They hold doors open for others and know the importance of good manners. Pupils trust staff to keep them safe because they take the time to get to know them as individuals.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils behave well overall. They understand the routines and expectations. Staff sort out any friendship issues quickly. Behaviour at lunchtime has improved now pupils have more to do. They enjoy various activities and resources, from the library to football, games club to exercise.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Staff provide a variety of activities to enrich the curriculum. Clubs and trips to museums help bring learning to life. Pupils are keen to help out around the school. They eagerly take on responsibilities as house captains and tuck shop monitors. A highlight for many is the ‘star award’ assembly. Pupils achieve certificates for displaying the ‘PARK’ values.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Many parents praise the school’s work. Positive comments include how the school has improved since being part of the federation.
p.2
better?
The school has been through an unsettling time since the previous inspection. During this period, standards have slipped. However, the school is on an upward trajectory of improvement. Senior leaders provide a clear sense of direction. They are working determinedly to bring about sustainable changes in a considered way. This means that some aspects are further developed than others.
p.2
better?
The teaching of reading is an urgent priority. Recently, the school introduced a new phonics programme for struggling readers. Books are well matched to the sounds pupils know. Although it is early days, some weaknesses exist in the support weaker readers receive. This prevents them from becoming confident and fluent readers. The school has plans to bring in early reading experts to provide further training and coaching for staff.
p.2
better?
The curriculum has gone through significant change. It now identifies the essential knowledge pupils need to learn. In established subjects, such as mathematics and history, pupils can recall prior learning using relevant vocabulary. For example, pupils in Year 3 can explain the concept of settlement. They know how Stone Age people developed from nomadic hunter-gatherers to farmers. However, the school is in the early stages of evaluating the impact of the new curriculum on pupils’ learning. Therefore, it does not fully understand how well pupils learn across all subjects. 3 and 4 October 2023
p.2
3
Teachers know what effective learning looks like. They present information clearly. For example, teachers show pupils how to build their knowledge step by step and recap prior learning. This is helping pupils to learn and remember more.
p.3
3
The school has improved how it identifies pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). Teachers plan learning that enables pupils with SEND to work alongside their peers. Nonetheless, some learning for pupils with SEND is not adapted precisely enough to meet their needs. This slows the progress these pupils make through the curriculum.
p.3
3
Pupils behave well most of the time. They respond to adult prompts quickly. A minority of pupils have complex needs. Staff help these pupils to regulate their behaviour so that learning is not disrupted. As a result of an improved curriculum and raised expectations, incidents of poor behaviour have reduced notably.
p.3
3
Through the curriculum, pupils know the importance of being responsible citizens. They raise money for charities and learn to respect other faiths and cultures. Pupils represent the school in sporting competitions and enjoy celebrating their achievements. They understand how to stay physically healthy and keep safe in the community.
p.3
3
Teaching staff speak positively about the raised ambition. They know that the school is now moving in the right direction. Staff value the opportunity to share expertise and best practices across the federation.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
Staff vary in how well they implement the phonics programme. As a result, too many weaker readers do not gain the knowledge they need to become confident and fluent readers. The school must ensure that the agreed approach to teaching phonics is used consistently well so that pupils catch up rapidly. Not all staff know how best to adapt learning for pupils with SEND. This means that some pupils are not supported well enough to learn across the curriculum. The school needs to ensure that all staff understand how to tailor learning so that pupils build knowledge securely across all subjects. The school has not evaluated the impact of changes to the curriculum in some subjects. Therefore, it does not have a full picture of how well pupils learn the intended curriculum. The school should strengthen the checking of processes so that it can gather and evaluate the impact of the curriculum on pupils’ learning.
p.3
How can I feed back my views?
or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.4
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 3 and 4 October 2023
p.4
School details
Appropriate authority The governing body
p.5
School details
Headteacher Lisa Jones (Executive headteacher)
p.5
School details
Dates of previous inspection 15 and 16 October 2019, under section 5 of the Education Act 2005
p.5
Information about this school
Significant changes in leadership, teaching staff and governance have occurred since the previous inspection. The executive headteacher joined the school in January 2022, following a period of interim leadership. The school became part of the Stonehouse Park Federation in December 2021. The federation consists of Stonehouse Park Infant School and Park Junior School. Schools in the federation share the same executive headteacher, executive deputy headteacher and governing body. A special educational needs coordinator (SENCo) took up post in January 2023. ◼ The school uses one registered alternative provider.
p.5
Information about this inspection
The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005. 3 and 4 October 2023
p.5
6
Inspections are a point-in-time judgement about the quality of a school’s education provision. Inspectors discussed any continued impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school. Inspectors met with the executive headteacher, the executive deputy headteacher, the SENCo and school staff. The lead inspector met with governors and held a telephone call with a representative from the local authority. Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: reading, mathematics, art, and history. For each deep dive, inspectors discussed the curriculum with the school, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work. Inspectors met with leaders and looked more widely at pupils’ writing. The lead inspector listened to pupils in Years 3, 4, 5 and 6 read to an adult. To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the lead inspector met the
p.6
6
designated safeguarding lead, checked the single central record of adults working in the school, took account of the views of staff and pupils, and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first. Inspectors observed pupils’ behaviour in lessons, during breaktime, lunchtime and around the school site. They spoke with pupils and staff about behaviour. Inspectors spoke with a range of staff to discuss how the school supports their workload and well-being. Inspectors spoke to parents at the start and end of the school day. They considered responses to Ofsted’s online survey, Ofsted Parent View, including free-text comments. They also considered responses to Ofsted’s staff and pupil questionnaires.
p.6
Inspection team
Dale Burr, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector
p.6
Inspection team
Nicola Berry Ofsted Inspector 3 and 4 October 2023
p.6
7
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
7
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
7
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
7
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
7
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion