Schools & FE · School monitoring visit
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Susan Aykin
- Postcode verified
BS6 5RD
- Name on report verified
Montpelier High School. This letter sets out the findings from the monitoring inspection that took place on 20
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Serious weaknesses monitoring inspection of Montpelier High School. p.1
- The monitoring inspection was carried out under section 8(2) of the Education Act 2005 and was the second monitoring inspection since the school was judged to have serious weaknesses following the graded (section 5) inspection that took place in March 2022. p.1
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Since the monitoring inspection in December 2022, a new headteacher has been appointed. p.1
- The senior leadership team now includes four associate headteachers. p.1
- In addition, the pastoral team has been expanded to include non-teaching heads of year. p.1
- The school has taken action to address the areas of weakness identified at the previous inspection. p.1
- For example, there are robust safeguarding procedures in place to protect the physical and emotional well-being of pupils. p.1
- The school works closely with external agencies, including the local authority’s safeguarding team, to ensure that pupils at risk of harm receive effective support. p.1
- The school is vigilant about the risks that pupils may face. p.1
- Through regular scrutiny of safeguarding concerns, the school ensures that all information pertaining to vulnerable pupils is recorded and shared effectively. p.1
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Teaching & assessment4
“Vanetta Spence Headteacher Montpelier High School Cheltenham Road Bristol BS6 5RD” p.1Personal development4
“However, sixth-form students study a very effective PSHE curriculum.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 2
- Words of findings
- 664
- shorter than usual (typical 1570)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 43, typical 47
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 5%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.1
Vanetta Spence Headteacher Montpelier High School Cheltenham Road Bristol BS6 5RD
p.1
Serious weaknesses monitoring inspection of Montpelier High School.
p.1
This letter sets out the findings from the monitoring inspection that took place on 20 September 2023, on behalf of His Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills. The monitoring inspection was carried out under section 8(2) of the Education Act 2005 and was the second monitoring inspection since the school was judged to have serious weaknesses following the graded (section 5) inspection that took place in March 2022.
p.1
The purpose of a monitoring inspection is not to grade the school’s overall effectiveness, but to identify and report on the school’s progress. It is to highlight to the school and parents any improvements that school leaders have made since the school’s previous graded inspection.
p.1
During the inspection, I discussed with you, other senior leaders, the chief executive officer and the director of secondary education from the multi-academy trust the actions that have been taken to improve the school since the most recent graded inspection. We discussed the ongoing impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. I evaluated the impact of the school’s work to date, scrutinised documents and met with groups of pupils. I have considered all this in coming to my judgement.
p.1
Leaders have made progress to improve the school, but more work is
necessary for the school to be no longer judged as having serious weaknesses.
p.1
designation
Since the monitoring inspection in December 2022, a new headteacher has been appointed. The senior leadership team now includes four associate headteachers. In addition, the pastoral team has been expanded to include non-teaching heads of year. The school has taken action to address the areas of weakness identified at the previous inspection. For example, there are robust safeguarding procedures in place to protect the physical and emotional well-being of pupils. The school works closely with external agencies, including the local authority’s safeguarding team, to ensure that pupils at risk of harm receive effective support. The school is vigilant about the risks that pupils may face. Through regular scrutiny of safeguarding concerns, the school ensures that all information pertaining to vulnerable pupils is recorded and shared effectively. For example, the attendance officer, the special educational needs coordinator, the safeguarding leader and
p.1
designation
heads of year meet frequently to evaluate the information they have about pupils and decide on appropriate actions.
p.2
designation
Pupils of all year groups report significant improvements in the relationships between pupils and between pupils and staff. Pupils have a trusted adult with whom they can share their worries. Many pupils state that they have strong relationships with staff and feel supported and protected.
p.2
designation
Pupils define bullying accurately and have increased confidence that bullying issues are resolved effectively. The school has improved its overview of behaviour and bullying incidents, both of which have decreased significantly. The school uses this information to identify emerging issues and to develop appropriate strategies to respond to these.
p.2
designation
The school has established a clear vision of success for all pupils. The mission is to create a school that is a sanctuary for pupils and a place where they can develop a strong sense of belonging. This is tangible in school improvement priorities. Consequently, the quality of welfare is prioritised along with the quality of education. However, despite the school having revised the personal, social and health education (PSHE) curriculum, many pupils do not yet feel that they are well prepared for the world beyond school. Some pupils feel that they do not receive a breadth of information and clear guidance about future careers and further education. However, sixth-form students study a very effective PSHE curriculum. Sixth-form students also receive detailed and informative guidance about careers, apprenticeships and higher education.
p.2
designation
I am copying this letter to the chair of the board of trustees and the chief executive officer of the Venturers Trust, the Department for Education’s regional director and the director of children’s services for Bristol. This letter will be published on the Ofsted reports website.
p.2
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion