Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School monitoring visit

Setting

Inspected — · published 13 Nov 2023

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Susan Aykin

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Susan Aykin

  • Postcode verified

    BS6 5RD

  • Name on report verified

    Montpelier High School. This letter sets out the findings from the monitoring inspection that took place on 20

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−23Mixedmore positive than 13% of reports of this type

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Praisevery effectiveeffectivelystrong relationshipsstrongrobusteffectiveimprovedclear
Criticismseriousweaknessesweaknessat riskconcernsharmnot yet

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings222w−80
  • What needs to improve442w+7

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
664
shorter than usual (typical 1570)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 43, typical 47
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
5%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 33%What needs to improve 67%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Vanetta Spence Headteacher Montpelier High School Cheltenham Road Bristol BS6 5RD

p.1

Serious weaknesses monitoring inspection of Montpelier High School.

p.1

This letter sets out the findings from the monitoring inspection that took place on 20 September 2023, on behalf of His Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills. The monitoring inspection was carried out under section 8(2) of the Education Act 2005 and was the second monitoring inspection since the school was judged to have serious weaknesses following the graded (section 5) inspection that took place in March 2022.

p.1

The purpose of a monitoring inspection is not to grade the school’s overall effectiveness, but to identify and report on the school’s progress. It is to highlight to the school and parents any improvements that school leaders have made since the school’s previous graded inspection.

p.1

During the inspection, I discussed with you, other senior leaders, the chief executive officer and the director of secondary education from the multi-academy trust the actions that have been taken to improve the school since the most recent graded inspection. We discussed the ongoing impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. I evaluated the impact of the school’s work to date, scrutinised documents and met with groups of pupils. I have considered all this in coming to my judgement.

p.1

Leaders have made progress to improve the school, but more work is

necessary for the school to be no longer judged as having serious weaknesses.

p.1

designation

Since the monitoring inspection in December 2022, a new headteacher has been appointed. The senior leadership team now includes four associate headteachers. In addition, the pastoral team has been expanded to include non-teaching heads of year. The school has taken action to address the areas of weakness identified at the previous inspection. For example, there are robust safeguarding procedures in place to protect the physical and emotional well-being of pupils. The school works closely with external agencies, including the local authority’s safeguarding team, to ensure that pupils at risk of harm receive effective support. The school is vigilant about the risks that pupils may face. Through regular scrutiny of safeguarding concerns, the school ensures that all information pertaining to vulnerable pupils is recorded and shared effectively. For example, the attendance officer, the special educational needs coordinator, the safeguarding leader and

p.1

designation

heads of year meet frequently to evaluate the information they have about pupils and decide on appropriate actions.

p.2

designation

Pupils of all year groups report significant improvements in the relationships between pupils and between pupils and staff. Pupils have a trusted adult with whom they can share their worries. Many pupils state that they have strong relationships with staff and feel supported and protected.

p.2

designation

Pupils define bullying accurately and have increased confidence that bullying issues are resolved effectively. The school has improved its overview of behaviour and bullying incidents, both of which have decreased significantly. The school uses this information to identify emerging issues and to develop appropriate strategies to respond to these.

p.2

designation

The school has established a clear vision of success for all pupils. The mission is to create a school that is a sanctuary for pupils and a place where they can develop a strong sense of belonging. This is tangible in school improvement priorities. Consequently, the quality of welfare is prioritised along with the quality of education. However, despite the school having revised the personal, social and health education (PSHE) curriculum, many pupils do not yet feel that they are well prepared for the world beyond school. Some pupils feel that they do not receive a breadth of information and clear guidance about future careers and further education. However, sixth-form students study a very effective PSHE curriculum. Sixth-form students also receive detailed and informative guidance about careers, apprenticeships and higher education.

p.2

designation

I am copying this letter to the chair of the board of trustees and the chief executive officer of the Venturers Trust, the Department for Education’s regional director and the director of children’s services for Bristol. This letter will be published on the Ofsted reports website.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion