Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

King's Park Academy

Inspected 27 Sept 2023 · published 10 Nov 2023 · URN 141671

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Julie Carrington (lead), Jyotsna Paranjape

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    27 Sept 2023

  • Inspectors verified

    Julie Carrington, Jyotsna Paranjape

  • Postcode verified

    BH1 4NB

  • Name on report verified

    King’s Park Academy

  • URN verified

    141671

Page 1 of 6
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+53Positivemore positive than 54% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisestrongenjoyconfidenteffectivewell sequencedrespectfulstrengthsimproving
Criticismconcernsseriouslapseslower

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1064w+51
  • Safeguarding6w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
6
Words of findings
1,069
about usual (typical 1153)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 52, typical 55
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
5
typical 4
Hedged sentences
6%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 65%Safeguarding 0%About the inspection 34%

Full report text

Inspection of a good school: King’s Park Academy Ashley Road, Bournemouth, Dorset BH1 4NB

p.1

Inspection dates: 26 and 27 September 2023

p.1

Outcome

King’s Park Academy continues to be a good school.

p.1

Outcome

The principal of this school is Lauren Dean. This school is part of Ambitions Academy Trust, which means other people in the trust also have responsibility for running the school. The trust is run by the chief executive officer, Sian Thomas, and overseen by a board of trustees, chaired by Caroline Sard. There is also a director of primary education, Alexandra Prout, who is responsible for this school and five others.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils enjoy attending this inclusive school. Typically, children in Reception learn routines quickly. Across the school, pupils learn how to behave well and be respectful to their peers. On occasion, when pupils have lapses of concentration, staff address this quickly, and pupils re-engage with learning promptly.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils receive strong pastoral support. They feel confident that adults provide help when they have worries, concerns or need extra emotional support. There is a range of extra- curricular activities on offer, such as karate, choir and gardening. Older pupils like being a ‘buddy’ with younger pupils.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Learning to read, write and become a confident mathematician sit centrally in the school’s curriculum. Alongside this, pupils enjoy learning a broad range of subjects.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

A range of school visits, such as visiting a planetarium or performing at musical events at Bournemouth Pavilion, broadens pupils’ horizons well. A highlight for many pupils is overnight camp. Pupils say that this helps them learn to be resilient and persevere. Pupils learn about right and wrong and how to make sensible decisions.

p.1

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

The trust knows the school’s strengths and areas that need refinement well. It deploys appropriate resources to ensure that pupils receive a suitable curriculum. Staff get the right training to ensure that they have the subject knowledge they need. The school 26 and 27 September 2023

p.1

2

prioritises supporting the most vulnerable pupils and families. A recent focus on improving pupils’ attendance is paying off.

p.2

2

Pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) routinely receive strong pastoral support. Staff implement individualised targets relating to pupils’ education, health and care plans well. Staff ensure that these pupils use resources such as visual timetables and learning prompts to scaffold their learning when necessary. This ensures that these pupils can learn well.

p.2

2

The trust regularly reviews how well pupils are achieving. Recent enhancements to the reading curriculum are proving effective. Consistent teaching approaches are in place to ensure that pupils gain the phonics knowledge they need to read and spell accurately. Nonetheless, a minority of pupils in key stage 1, who did not learn to read sufficiently well in the recent past, are receiving extra teaching to develop their ability to use phonics to read whole words. This is ensuring that these pupils’ accuracy is increasing steadily.

p.2

2

Staff work in unison to ensure that the curriculum across subjects is continuously improving. For example, in mathematics, staff have designed a curriculum that enables pupils to problem-solve and reason well. Nonetheless, staff know that ensuring the quick recall of mathematical facts remains a top priorty across the school.

p.2

2

The wider curriculum is well sequenced. It includes the subject content pupils should learn and by when they should know it. Staff are implementing the intended curriculum increasingly well. As a result, pupils now know and remember more over time. For example, pupils build on their prior knowledge of tints, tones and colour progressively across the curriculum for art.

p.2

2

Across the school, staff use a range of assessment tools to find out what pupils know and remember. However, staff sometimes do not adapt teaching sequences sufficiently well. When this happens, teaching does not enable pupils, including some pupils with SEND, to learn the most essential knowledge that they need to know next. At these times, teaching does not support pupils to move on in their learning when they are ready.

p.2

2

The curriculum teaches pupils about equality and diversity well. Teaching ensures that pupils know how to keep themselves safe online. Staff implement the school’s behaviour policy well. This ensures that pupils are successful in learning how to regulate their behaviour.

p.2

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.2

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 In some sequences of work, teaching does not prioritise the most important curriculum content that pupils need to know next. This makes it more difficult for pupils to 26 and 27 September 2023

p.2

3

progress through the curriculum and slows down their learning. The school must ensure that staff use all the information they have to plan and adapt curriculum sequences so that all pupils progress through the curriculum consistently well.

p.3

Background

When we have judged a school to be good, we will then normally go into the school about once every four years to confirm that the school remains good. This is called an ungraded inspection, and it is carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. We do not give graded judgements on an ungraded inspection. However, if we find evidence that a school would now receive a higher or lower grade, then the next inspection will be a graded inspection, which is carried out under section 5 of the Act. Usually this is within one to two years of the date of the ungraded inspection. If we have serious concerns about safeguarding, behaviour or the quality of education, we will deem the ungraded inspection a graded inspection immediately.

p.3

Background

This is the first ungraded inspection since we judged the school to be good in April 2018.

p.3

How can I feed back my views?

find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.3

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.3

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.3

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 26 and 27 September 2023

p.3

School details

Local authority Bournemouth, Christchurch & Poole

p.4

School details

Dates of previous inspection 24 and 25 April 2018, under section 5 of the Education Act 2005

p.4

Information about this school

 There are three classes in each year group and two ‘hub’ classes for pupils with SEND.  This school is part of Ambitions Academies Trust, which contains six primary schools, five secondary schools and two special schools.

p.4

Information about this inspection

 Inspections are a point-in-time judgement about the quality of a school’s education provision.  This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. The inspector discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and has taken that into account in their evaluation of the school.  Inspectors met with the principal, assistant principals, other school staff, the chair of trustees, a representative of the academy advisory committee, the chief executive officer and the director of education who holds the leadership responsibility for SEND in the school, as well as members of the school’s inclusion team. 26 and 27 September 2023

p.4

5

 An inspector also held a meeting with a representative of the local authority SEND team.  The inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: early reading, mathematics, history and art. For each deep dive, the inspectors discussed the curriculum with subject leaders, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work.  An inspector listened to pupils in Years 1, 2 and 3 read to an adult.  To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the inspectors: reviewed the single central record; took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils; and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first.  Inspectors observed pupils’ behaviour in lessons and around the school site. They spoke with pupils and staff about behaviour.  Inspectors spoke with a range of staff to discuss how leaders support their workload

p.5

5

and well-being.  An inspector considered responses to Ofsted’s online survey, Ofsted Parent View, including free-text comments, and responses to the staff and pupil survey.

p.5

Inspection team

Julie Carrington, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector

p.5

Inspection team

Jyotsna Paranjape Ofsted Inspector 26 and 27 September 2023

p.5

6

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.6

6

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.6

6

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.6

6

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.6

6

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.6

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion