Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Maple Grove Primary School

Inspected 27 Sept 2023 · published 9 Nov 2023 · URN 135221

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Requires improvement

Sara Boyce (lead), Laura Hewer

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    27 Sept 2023

  • Inspectors verified

    Laura Hewer, Sara Boyce

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Requires improvement

  • Early years verified

    Requires improvement

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement

  • Personal development verified

    Requires improvement

  • Quality of education verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    HP2 7BG

  • Name on report verified

    Maple Grove Primary School

  • URN verified

    135221

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2018.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Behaviour and attitudesRequires improvement
  • Early yearsRequires improvement
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement
  • Personal developmentRequires improvement
  • Quality of educationRequires improvement

15% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (5,043 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−15Mixedmore positive than 10% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseenjoyaccuratelyeffectiveunsafeambitioussuccessfulimprovedengaging
Criticismconcernsinconsistentdisruptionnot sufficientlyinconsistencieslacksnot alwaystoo low

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1179w−17
  • Safeguarding6w+33
  • What needs to improve34w—

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,180
about usual (typical 1215)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 57, typical 56
Average sentence
14 words
Next steps
6
typical 5
Hedged sentences
22%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 64%Safeguarding 0%What needs to improve 2%About the inspection 34%

Full report text

Inspection of Maple Grove Primary School St Agnell’s Lane, Grove Hill, Hemel Hempstead, Hertfordshire HP2 7BG

p.1

Inspection dates: 26 and 27 September 2023

p.1

Overall effectiveness Requires improvement

The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Requires improvement Personal development Requires improvement Leadership and management Requires improvement Early years provision Requires improvement Previous inspection grade Good 26 and 27 September 2023

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils like their school and the friends they make here. Some of their favourite lessons are mathematics, history and art. Pupils are keen to do well. They appreciate the changes to the curriculum new leaders are putting in place. At present, though, some pupils are not achieving as well as they could. Pupils, including pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) need more targeted help from staff to secure their understanding of what they need to know.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils are getting used to the five ‘golden rules’ that have just been introduced. They know how staff expect them to behave. They like earning ‘marbles in a jar’ to get a class reward. However, there are still occasions when a few pupils distract the learning of others. Pupils do not feel unsafe due to this but would like staff to do more to prevent these behaviours repeating.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils know they can talk to adults about any concerns. They like time to share their feelings in ‘draw and talk’ time or when with the school therapy dog.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

There are some opportunities for trips, but pupils would like more visits linked to the topics they are learning about. Pupils enjoy clubs such as choir, football and learning sign language.

p.2

better?

Leaders have correctly identified the areas that need to improve and are working on them. However, much of this improvement work is still in its early stages.

p.2

better?

The school has revised the curriculums for reading, writing and mathematics to ensure they are fit for purpose. Leaders have put in place clearly defined learning steps that pupils need to take in these subjects. Staff have had training on these curriculum updates. Teachers check pupils’ understanding. However, sometimes these checks are not thorough enough, which limits how quickly gaps in knowledge can be addressed.

p.2

better?

A new phonics programme has been implemented. Pupils, including children in early years, practise reading every day. Pupils enjoy the books adults choose. Staff regularly check the sounds pupils know. Less-confident readers receive additional reading support. However, these reading checks are not sufficiently precise. As a result, some pupils are reading books that are too easy for them. This limits the opportunities for these pupils to become more successful readers and catch up with their peers.

p.2

better?

In the foundation subjects, leaders are in the process of updating the curriculum. This work is more developed in some subjects than others. Therefore, pupils are currently not getting the full depth of knowledge outlined in the curriculum’s ambition. 26 and 27 September 2023

p.2

3

Staff now accurately identify pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). For some pupils with SEND, this has improved how they are assisted in class. In the best examples, pupils have work that is matched to specific needs and advice from specialists is being acted upon. However, provision for pupils with SEND remains inconsistent. In some parts of the school, expectations are not high enough for these pupils and too little is done to meet their needs. Therefore, some pupils with SEND are not achieving as well as they could.

p.3

3

Children in the early years now have access to a stimulating learning environment and engaging learning activities. The curriuclum has been recently redesigned to ensure children are better prepared for Year 1. However, staff are still getting to grips with how they deliver the aspirational curriculum which leaders have rightly put in place. This means that there are still some inconsistencies in how well activities match children’s needs. Some work set lacks the ambition that leaders intend.

p.3

3

The school can be calm and purposeful. However, pupils do have concerns about how others can distract them from their learning in class or be unkind at breaktimes. A new behaviour policy has been recently introduced. Staff are getting used to this policy and how best to meet the needs of these unsettled pupils. Consequently, some low-level disruption continues.

p.3

3

Most pupils attend school regularly. Leaders’ actions have resulted in fewer pupils persistently missing school.

p.3

3

The curriculum that teaches pupils about values and respect has also only recently been updated. Pupils have an emerging understanding of equality and democracy. They do not always know about appropriate language to use and when it may be derogatory. Pupils are aware of other faiths and religions. Pupils know how to lead healthy lifestyles and stay safe.

p.3

3

Staff are positive about the direction the school is moving in. They appreciate leaders checking on staff’s welfare and workload.

p.3

3

Governors have been supported by the local authority to ensure they are better equipped to fulfil their statutory duties and to hold leaders to account. Governors are no longer over-reliant on this external support.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 Some parts of the curriculum are still being updated. Not all subjects have enough explicit or precise detail of how pupils’ knowledge will build over time. This means some pupils are not learning what leaders intend and many have developed misconceptions. Leaders need to signpost more specifically the key knowledge they want pupils to learn. Leaders and teachers need to check accurately that pupils have learned this knowledge securely.  Some staff’s expectations for pupils with SEND are too low or inconsistent. This means these pupils do not do as well as they could because staff do not precisely identify the right ways to help them. Staff need support to know how to adapt activities more accurately to these pupils’ needs and ensure activities set for pupils with SEND are suitably ambitious. Leaders need to check that this happens.  Checks on how well weaker readers are achieving are not robust enough. This

p.4

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

means pupils who need help with reading are not catching up quickly enough. Leaders need to train staff to accurately check pupils’ reading ability and then match reading books and additional support appropriately.  There are instances of low-level disruption that disturb the flow of lessons. Too often, pupils have their learning interrupted. Staff need to ensure the new behaviour policy is consistently applied and that effective strategies are put in place to prevent unwelcome behaviours being repeated.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ is used to mean pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); pupils who meet the definition of children in need of help and protection ; pupils receiving statutory local authority support from a social worker; and pupils who otherwise meet the criteria used for deciding the school’s pupil premium funding (this includes pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years, looked after children (children in local authority care) and/or children who left care through adoption or another formal route). 26 and 27 September 2023

p.4

School details

Chair of governing body Allyson Woodhouse

p.5

School details

Dates of previous inspection 17 January 2018, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005

p.5

Information about this school

 The current headteacher was appointed in January 2023. There have been three changes of headteacher since 2021.  The current early years leader started in May 2023 and the new special educational needs coordinator has been in post September 2023.  The school runs and manages its own before- and after-school clubs.  The school does not use any alternative provision.

p.5

Information about this inspection

The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.5

Information about this inspection

 Inspections are a point-in-time judgement about the quality of a school’s education provision.  This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with the school and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school. 26 and 27 September 2023

p.5

6

 The inspectors held meetings with the headteacher, senior leaders, the special educational needs coordinator, subject leaders, teachers and support staff.  The inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: early reading, mathematics, history and physical education. For the deep dives, inspectors spoke to subject leaders, visited lessons, spoke with pupils, looked at pupils’ workbooks and spoke with teachers and support staff. The lead inspector also heard pupils read to a familiar adult.  The inspectors also looked at documentation relating to the curriculum in other subjects.  The lead inspector held meetings with the local authority school improvement partner.  The lead inspector spoke to the chair of governors and two other members of the governing body.  The inspectors scrutinised a range of documentation including the school’s own self-evaluation and school improvement plan. They also reviewed local authority

p.6

6

advisers notes of visits and action plans relating to governance.  To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, the inspectors reviewed the single central record, took account of the views of leaders, staff and pupils and considered the extent to which the school has created an open and positive culture around safeguarding that puts pupils’ interests first.  The inspectors considered the responses gathered through Ofsted’s online survey for parents, Ofsted Parent View, which included 19 free-text comments. One of the inspectors also spoke to parents at the school gate. There were 12 responses to the staff survey. There were no responses to the pupil survey. However, inspectors spoke to several pupils from different year groups during the inspection.

p.6

Inspection team

Sara Boyce, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

Laura Hewer Ofsted Inspector 26 and 27 September 2023

p.6

7

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion