Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Early years · Early years inspection (EIF)

Park Royal Montessori Nursery

Inspected 4 Oct 2023 · published 8 Nov 2023 · URN EY451672

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Inadequate

Agnes Wink

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Group verified

    Kindervine Day Nursery Limited

  • Group reference verified

    RP531866

  • Inspection date verified

    4 Oct 2023

  • Inspectors verified

    Agnes Wink

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Inadequate

  • Leadership and management verified

    Inadequate

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Inadequate

  • Personal development verified

    Inadequate

  • Previous overall verified

    Good

  • Quality of education verified

    Inadequate

  • Postcode verified

    NW10 7TR

  • Name on report verified

    Park Royal Montessori Nursery

  • URN verified

    EY451672

Page 1 of 8
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2023.

  • OverallInadequate
  • Behaviour and attitudesInadequate
  • Leadership and managementInadequate
  • Personal developmentInadequate
  • Quality of educationInadequate

5% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (17,905 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−50Criticalmore positive than 29% of reports of this type graded Inadequate
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectivestrongeffectivelyrichpositivesecureclearhappy
Criticismbreachespoornot consistentlynot effectiveunacceptableweaknessesfailedweak

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings823w−75
  • Safeguarding351w+23

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
8
Words of findings
1,135
about usual (typical 972)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 41, typical 51
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
1
typical 1
Hedged sentences
14%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 50%Safeguarding 22%About the inspection 28%

Full report text

Inspection of Park Royal Montessori Nursery 3A Unimix House, Abbey Road, LONDON NW10 7TR

p.1

Overall effectiveness Inadequate

The quality of education Inadequate Behaviour and attitudes Inadequate Personal development Inadequate Leadership and management Inadequate Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Good

p.1

The provision is inadequate

Breaches to the safeguarding and welfare requirements of the early years foundation stage have a significant impact on the learning, safety and well-being of children. The provider has not made the required improvements to meet the statutory requirements, and many of the breaches of requirements found at this inspection have been raised during previous visits. This means that there continue to be significant weaknesses in the quality of the provision.

p.2

The provision is inadequate

Children do not consistently receive high-quality interactions and rich learning opportunities. This is because leaders do not monitor how the setting's curriculum is implemented. Staff do not plan and deliver a broad and balanced range of activities and experiences. For example, staff do not implement educational programmes for children under two-years-old when they are in the mixed-age group.

p.2

The provision is inadequate

Children's positive attitudes to learning and each other are negatively impacted by poor teaching. There are times when children's behaviour is disruptive to learning. Staff are not consistent in ensuring that they support children with managing behavioural expectations. For example, at times, staff tell children to use 'walking feet' when they run indoors, but more often this is unchallenged, and no explanation is given. As a result, children do not have consistent opportunities to learn about acceptable and unacceptable behaviour.

p.2

need to do better?

n Leaders failed to ensure that staff's understanding of safeguarding is up to date and secure. Some staff do not demonstrate sound understanding of safeguarding policies and procedures, including identifying signs of abuse. They are not clear about reporting procedures in line with the local safeguarding partnership. This negatively impacts on children's overall safety. n Leadership and management are weak. Leaders do not focus on how they can support staff so they can build on what children already know and can do. As a result, the poorly delivered curriculum does not meet the individual needs of the range of children who attend. n Leaders do not monitor the provision effectively. Staff do not benefit from effective supervision, training and support that help them to improve the quality of their teaching and personal effectiveness. Consequently, the quality of teaching is poor. n Although every child has a key person, staff do not always fulfil their roles as a

p.2

need to do better?

key person. For example, some children have limited contact with their key person, and some parents do not know who their child's key person is and how they can support their children's learning. This does not support formation of

p.2

need to do better?

4 October 2023 strong and secure attachments and continuity of learning. n Staff do not implement effective strategies to manage children's behaviour. For example, at times, staff do not challenge unwanted behaviour, such as throwing toys or pinching. They do not use appropriate strategies or language to teach children about expectations. This leaves children confused and not knowing what is expected of them. n Staff do not follow hygiene practices consistently. For example, they fail to ensure that children wash their hands on their arrival and before breakfast. In addition, staff do not minimise risks to children effectively. For example, when starting a dancing activity, they do no ensure that the floor is clear of wooden blocks. This shows that staff are not vigilant enough and do not minimise the risk to children. n Interactions between some children and staff are limited. Staff do not consistently support children to develop their language and vocabulary. At times,

p.2

need to do better?

staff introduce new words, such as 'squirrel'. However, they do not ensure that children who are less confident to talk are engaged in group activities as much as others. n Children benefit from daily play in the garden. They use wheeled toys and outdoor climbing apparatus. This supports the development of their full-body movements. Staff provide children with some opportunities to strengthen their small muscles as they explore dough, engage in sticking and gluing and make marks with pencils. n Children have some opportunities to hear and use mathematical language. However, while singing a song, staff do not notice that the number of fingers they show does not correspond to the number in the song. Overall, implementation of the curriculum is not monitored well, and learning is often incidental rather than planned. n Staff do not engage all children successfully. For example, staff do not promote learning opportunities during adult-led activities for the younger children. This

p.3

need to do better?

means the younger children are not engaging in learning that is meaningful or purposeful for them. n The learning environment does not support the curriculum intent. Incomplete resources are not replenished. This, along with poor-quality interactions, significantly limits children's learning opportunities and hinders their progress, including for children with special educational needs and/or disabilities. n Overall, parents are satisfied with the service and say that their children are happy to attend.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective.

p.3

Safeguarding

The provider does not take all necessary steps to keep children safe. Some staff do not have an understanding of safeguarding policies and procedures, including identifying signs of abuse at the earliest opportunity and reporting procedures in line with the local safeguarding partnership. Some staff are uncertain about the responsibilities of different agencies and do not know about the setting's whistle-

p.3

Safeguarding

4 October 2023 blowing policy. Risk assessment is not robust, as staff do not remain vigilant and do not minimise risks to children's safety. The manager follows effective recruitment procedures to check staff's suitability to work with children.

p.3

Due date

train all staff to understand the setting's safeguarding policy and procedures, to ensure that all staff have up-to-date knowledge of child protection matters, including identifying signs of possible abuse at the earliest opportunity and reporting procedures in line with the local safeguarding partnership procedures 20/10/2023

p.4

Due date

improve oversight of the setting to ensure that leaders meet the responsibilities of their roles and that staff receive the support they need to improve their practice 20/10/2023

p.4

Due date

take immediate and effective actions to ensure that all staff receive effective supervision and targeted coaching and mentoring to ensure they understand their roles and responsibilities and to improve the quality of education for children 20/10/2023

p.4

Due date

put effective key-person arrangements in place to ensure that children's learning and welfare needs are catered for effectively and to establish strong partnerships with parents 20/10/2023

p.4

Due date

use consistent strategies for managing children's behaviour so that children have a clear understanding of appropriate boundaries and expectations 20/10/2023

p.4

Due date

4 October 2023 implement effective risk assessment and good hygiene practices to promote the good health and hygiene needs of all children attending the setting. 20/10/2023

p.4

Due date

improve interactions between staff and children, including with children who are less confident to talk 04/12/2023

p.5

Due date

improve implementation of the curriculum in all areas to help children make the best possible progress 04/12/2023

p.5

Due date

support staff to differentiate teaching and implement the curriculum to meet the needs of all children, including children under two-years-old 04/12/2023

p.5

Due date

ensure resources available promote children's learning, curiosity and engagement. 04/12/2023

p.5

Setting details

Unique reference number EY451672 Local authority Brent Inspection number 10311117 Type of provision Childcare on non-domestic premises

p.6

Registers

Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register Day care type Full day care

p.6

inspection

Total number of places 45 Number of children on roll 14 Name of registered person Kindervine Day Nursery Limited

p.6

reference number

Telephone number 02089653993 Date of previous inspection 21 March 2023

p.6

Information about this early years setting

Park Royal Montessori Nursery registered in 2012 and is situated in the London Borough of Brent. The nursery is open from 7.30am to 6pm, for 51 weeks of the year. It employs four members of staff, all of whom hold relevant early years qualifications. The nursery provides funded early education for two-, three- and four-year-old children.

p.6

Inspection activities

n The inspector discussed any continued impact of the pandemic with the manager and has taken that into account in their evaluation of the provider. n The inspector completed a learning walk with the deputy manager and discussed the intentions for children's learning. n The inspector observed the quality of interactions between staff and children and assessed the impact on children's learning. n A joint observation of teaching and learning was carried out by the inspector and the deputy manager. n A variety of documents were viewed, including staff qualification certificates and some suitability information.

p.7

Inspection activities

We carried out this inspection under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children's learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.

p.7

Inspection activities

4 October 2023 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

Inspection activities

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.8

Inspection activities

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk

p.8

Inspection activities

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.8

Inspection activities

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.8

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion