Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School monitoring visit

Staffordshire University Academy

Inspected — · published 29 Nov 2022 · URN 137164

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Eve Morris

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Eve Morris

  • Postcode verified

    WS12 4JH

  • Name on report verified

    Staffordshire University Academy

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−11Mixedmore positive than 22% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseambitiouspositiveconfidentlyeffectivelyeffectiverobustimproving
Criticismat riskrequires improvementnot alwaysdecliningconcernsconcernpersistent absencestruggle

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings805w−14
  • What needs to improve37w+11

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
840
shorter than usual (typical 1570)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 55, typical 47
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
2
typical 8
Hedged sentences
5%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 96%What needs to improve 4%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Rowena Hillier Principal Staffordshire University Academy Marston Road Hednesford Cannock Staffordshire WS12 4JH

p.1

Academy

This letter sets out the findings from the monitoring inspection of your school that took place on 19 October 2022, on behalf of His Majesty's Chief Inspector of Education, Children's Services and Skills. The monitoring inspection was carried out under section 8(2) of the Education Act 2005 and took place because the school received a judgement of requires improvement at its previous graded (section 5).

p.1

Academy

During the inspection, I discussed the actions that have been taken to improve the school since the most recent graded inspection with you, other senior leaders, the CEO of the multi-academy trust and governors. We discussed the ongoing impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. I also spoke with the leaders of mathematics and English, met with trust staff, visited lessons, spoke with pupils, looked at pupils’ work and scrutinised documents, including safeguarding documents. I have considered all of these actions in coming to my judgement.

p.1

have made progress to improve the school, but more work is necessary for the

The school should take further action to:

p.1

have made progress to improve the school, but more work is necessary for the

 work with families to reduce levels of persistent absence  strengthen the support for pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND), so they can access the ambitious curriculum.

p.1

Main findings

You have established an ambitious culture in the school. Staff share this ambition. You and your leadership team have worked hard to address the issues identified at the previous inspection. In all subjects, leaders are thinking carefully about what they want pupils to learn and when they should learn it. Pupils’ learning is sequenced well and teachers ensure that they deliberately revisit the important knowledge they want the pupils to remember. You have ensured that staff share the mantra 'teach to the top'. Usually this works well. However, at times, for some pupils with SEND, their learning does not build on what they already know. For example, pupils worked confidently on converting complex decimals to fractions, but struggled to divide by five. At times, support is in place to ensure all pupils have the resources to be able to get the support they need, but this is not always the case.

p.2

Main findings

You have worked to address the variability that existed in the delivery of the curriculum. All staff have had significant training on how to implement the intended curriculum. You have established a positive learning culture. Staff say they appreciate the ‘drop-in' visits that leaders complete to see pupils’ learning in action. One teacher said, 'I feel like I'm growing all the time. We are all learning. No-one is the finished product’.’ There is still work to do to ensure that these improvements are maintained in modern foreign languages. You have had difficulty to appoint and retain staff in this department, but are hopeful that recent appointments will help stability.

p.2

Main findings

Developing whole school reading has been a priority. All staff have received training in how to use texts effectively to help pupils to develop reading strategies. An example of this was seen in the choice of text in a history lesson. Pupils were pre-taught key vocabulary before reading the text, so they understood the meaning. You have also considered how to support those pupils who struggle to read. These pupils receive support from a trained adult to help them to catch up with their peers. You plan to train all staff in their understanding of phonics.

p.2

Main findings

Pupils’ attendance was impacted by the pandemic, but it is now improving. Leaders acknowledge that there are still too many pupils who are regularly absent from school. Leaders are addressing this and the number of pupils who are regularly absent is declining. There is still work to do to ensure that all families understand the importance of regular attendance.

p.2

Main findings

Safeguarding is effective. You have detailed systems for logging any concerns. Staff know the signs to look for, which may indicate that a pupil is at risk of harm. Staff also know how to make a referral to the safeguarding team.

p.2

Main findings

Staff are very positive about their workload and well-being. They appreciate the things that leaders do that go above and beyond to support their well-being. During the inspection you were holding ‘Well-being Week’. Staff spoke enthusiastically about the different activities they did, such as pasta making, dodgeball and making ceramic toadstools. Staff say workload is manageable and leaders listen if they have a concern.

p.2

Main findings

The trust provides a high level of targeted support for leadership development. Governors know the school well. They provide you with appropriate support and challenge. This is helping to drive improvements in the school. You have worked collaboratively with the trust and a range of external partners commissioned by the trust. You also work well with the local authority to ensure that safeguarding systems are robust.

p.3

Main findings

I am copying this letter to the chair of the board of trustees, and the chief executive officer of the Staffordshire University Academies multi-academy trust, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children's services for Staffordshire. This letter will be published on the Ofsted reports website.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion