Early years · Early years inspection (EIF)
Twinkle Star Pre School Ltd
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Group verified
Twinkle Star Pre-School Limited
- Group reference verified
RP909795
- Inspection date verified
21 Apr 2023
- Inspectors verified
Shauneen Wainwright
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Inadequate
- Leadership and management verified
Inadequate
- Overall effectiveness verified
Inadequate
- Personal development verified
Inadequate
- Previous overall verified
Outstanding
- Quality of education verified
Inadequate
- Postcode verified
M43 7AZ
- Name on report verified
Twinkle Star Pre School Ltd
- URN verified
EY469016
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2014.
- OverallInadequate
- Behaviour and attitudesInadequate
- Leadership and managementInadequate
- Personal developmentInadequate
- Quality of educationInadequate
5% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (17,905 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- However, overall, the curriculum is poorly designed, lacks depth and staff do not understand the areas of learning they are attempting to deliver. p.2
- Poor staff deployment seriously impacts upon the learning environment. p.2
- This poor deployment, at times, undermines children's safety, as staff cannot adequately supervise children. p.2
- Staff do identify next steps in learning and development for their key children, however, they fail to plan activities to support these goals. p.2
- Children with SEND are failed in this setting. p.2
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No next steps set out.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance9
“The management team fail to deploy staff effectively to meet the needs of all children.” p.2SEND & inclusion5
“Children with SEND are failed in this setting.” p.2Staff development2
“manager carries out supervisions and appraisals with staff.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,039
- about usual (typical 972)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 46, typical 51
- Average sentence
- 15 words
- Next steps
- 0
- typical 1
- Hedged sentences
- 13%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Twinkle Star Pre School Ltd 234 Market Street, Droylsden, MANCHESTER M43 7AZ
p.1
Overall effectiveness Inadequate
The quality of education Inadequate Behaviour and attitudes Inadequate Personal development Inadequate Leadership and management Inadequate Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Outstanding
p.1
The provision is inadequate
Children struggle to engage with any meaningful learning at this loud, unorganised setting. The management team fail to deploy staff effectively to meet the needs of all children. Younger children and children with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) in particular do not have good quality experiences. This poor deployment, at times, undermines children's safety, as staff cannot adequately supervise children.
p.2
The provision is inadequate
The manager openly admits that there is no curriculum in place for children with SEND. She does not plan activities or consistently implement strategies to support these children in their ongoing development. Similarly, two-year-olds are often overwhelmed and disengaged due to their needs not being considered within the curriculum. Older children enjoy some aspects of education. They recall phrases from their favourite stories and happily sing along to nursery rhymes. However, overall, the curriculum is poorly designed, lacks depth and staff do not understand the areas of learning they are attempting to deliver.
p.2
The provision is inadequate
Despite this, children form warm bonds with staff. Older children, who are more accustomed to the hectic environment, show that they are independent explorers. They readily access toys and play with their peers. Some children begin to form strong friendships with others. However, children are not given clear expectations for behaviour and are often left to their own devices. This particularly does not support quieter, younger or less confident children who, unfortunately, fade into the background.
p.2
need to do better?
n Poor staff deployment seriously impacts upon the learning environment. The management team fail to recognise that although there are enough staff in the building, they are unable to effectively supervise and organise the numbers of children present. This leads to a chaotic environment which, at times, hinders children's learning. This also leaves children at risk. For example, children wrap handbag straps around their neck and wander alone into rooms they are not supposed to enter without staff noticing. n The management team and staff do not securely understand how young children learn. They fail to provide a challenging, well-designed curriculum, which supports children's ongoing progression. Staff do identify next steps in learning and development for their key children, however, they fail to plan activities to support these goals. Instead, children who are most able do not receive sufficient challenge and gain little from planned learning experiences.
p.2
need to do better?
Children who are quieter and less confident, shy away and experience few staff- led interactions at all. Children do not make the progress they are capable of.
p.2
need to do better?
21 April 2023 n Children with SEND are failed in this setting. The management team do little to engage these children, who spend the majority of their day without meaningful interactions. The management team do not understand how to implement a curriculum designed to meet the needs of these children. They state that their setting is a 'safe place' for these children to attend and that their education will take place in later provisions, such as school. Most staff mirror this view, a minority of staff show a good understanding of SEND and how to support children. However, this is not enough to positively impact learning and development for these children, who make little progress. n The providers and the management team do not have accurate oversight of the setting. They fail to complete suitability checks for all staff. They also fail to effectively evaluate the quality of care and education provided. For instance, the
p.2
need to do better?
manager carries out supervisions and appraisals with staff. However, as she does not understand the curriculum herself, she cannot help to raise the quality of teaching provided by staff. However, staff do report that they feel confident to approach the manager with any personal concerns, they feel supported in their roles and happy at the setting. n The manager is committed to building and maintaining respectful working partnerships with parents. Parents share positive feedback for the manager and staff. They appreciate that their children are learning to make strong friendships and find communication to be a strength of the setting. Parents also comment that the manager has been very supportive. Information about children's days is shared with their parents, who enjoy this glimpse into their child's world. n Children's personal development is not well supported. Their social and emotional well-being is not given priority. This is because staff are too consumed
p.3
need to do better?
with attempted supervision, tidying up and moving large groups of children from one spot to another. Some children become upset, others stare off into the distance while others begin to run around and act boisterously. Children have narrow experiences at this setting.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective.
p.3
Safeguarding
The management team and staff do not have a secure understanding of their roles and responsibilities in safeguarding children. The manager, who is also the designated safeguarding lead, does not fully understand some aspects of child protection, such as managing allegations against staff. This means she is not well equipped to support her staff team in these areas. Some members of staff mirror the managers' lack of knowledge and this undermines the effectiveness of safeguarding at this provision. Staff complete daily risk assessments but fail to identify obvious hazards in the process. They tick a box to say there are no trailing wires in the room, despite the inspector identifying five trailing wires within reach of children. This undermines children's safety. The majority of staff have robust suitability checks in place. However, the manager and the providers do not recognise the risks of using Disclosure and Barring Service checks which are
p.3
Safeguarding
several years old for newly hired staff.
p.3
Due date
identify and rectify any risks within the environment, such as trailing wires and choking hazards 22/05/2023
p.4
Due date
deploy staff effectively to meets the needs of all children 08/05/2023
p.4
Due date
provide a challenging and appropriate curriculum for all children to support their ongoing progression 22/05/2023
p.4
Due date
ensure children with special educational needs and/or disabilities are given appropriate, targeted support to aid progression and support them to access and enjoy the curriculum 22/05/2023
p.4
Due date
ensure the suitability of all staff has been verified 08/05/2023
p.4
Due date
ensure leaders maintain effective oversight and evaluation of the setting to identify and implement improvements in the quality of care and education 22/05/2023
p.4
Due date
ensure all staff and leaders have a sufficient understanding of safeguarding children with particular regard to allegations management. 08/05/2023
p.4
Setting details
Unique reference number EY469016 Local authority Tameside Inspection number 10285211 Type of provision Childcare on non-domestic premises
p.5
Registers
Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register, Voluntary Childcare Register Day care type Full day care
p.5
inspection
Total number of places 64 Number of children on roll 73 Name of registered person Twinkle Star Pre-School Limited
p.5
reference number
Telephone number 01613701111 Date of previous inspection 11 October 2018
p.5
Information about this early years setting
Twinkle Star Pre School Ltd registered in August 2013. It is situated in the Droylsden area of Tameside. The pre-school employs 11 members of childcare staff. Of these, two hold an appropriate early years qualification at level 6 and nine hold appropriate qualifications at level 3. The pre-school opens Monday to Friday, from 9.10am until 2.45pm, term time only. Before- and after-school care is also available and a holiday club operates eight weeks of the year. The pre-school provides funded early education for two-, three- and four-year-old children.
p.5
Inspection activities
n This was the first routine inspection the provider received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. The inspector discussed the impact of the pandemic with the provider and has taken that into account in their evaluation of the provider. n We carried out this inspection as a result of a risk assessment, following information we received about the provider. n The inspector viewed the provision and discussed the safety and suitability of the premises. n The operations manager, manager and inspector completed a learning walk together of all areas of the nursery and discussed the early years curriculum. n The inspector talked to staff at appropriate times during the inspection and took account of their views. n The manager provided the inspector with a sample of key documentation on request. n The inspector observed the quality of education being provided, indoors and outdoors, and assessed the impact that this was having on children's learning.
p.6
Inspection activities
We carried out this inspection under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children's learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.
p.6
Inspection activities
21 April 2023 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.6
Inspection activities
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
Inspection activities
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk
p.7
Inspection activities
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
Inspection activities
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion