Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School monitoring visit

Setting

Inspected — · published 28 Sept 2023

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Victoria Griffin

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Victoria Griffin

  • Postcode verified

    BH11 9JJ

  • Name on report verified

    Oak Academy This letter sets out the findings from the monitoring inspection of your school that took

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+43Positivemore positive than 78% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivelyambitiousrobustconsistentlypositiveeffectiveclearlyimproving
Criticismrequires improvementnot yetbelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings357w+57
  • What needs to improve157w−11

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
513
shorter than usual (typical 1570)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 51, typical 47
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
6
typical 8
Hedged sentences
9%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 69%What needs to improve 31%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Hayley Richley Principal Oak Academy Duck Lane Bournemouth Dorset BH11 9JJ

p.1

Requires improvement monitoring inspection of Oak Academy

This letter sets out the findings from the monitoring inspection of your school that took place on 19 July 2023, on behalf of His Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills. The monitoring inspection was carried out under section 8(2) of the Education Act 2005 and took place because the school has received three successive judgements of requires improvement at its previous graded (section 5) inspections.

p.1

Requires improvement monitoring inspection of Oak Academy

During the inspection, I discussed with you and other senior leaders, the CEO of the multi-academy trust, other staff and trustees the actions that have been taken to improve the school since the most recent graded inspection. We discussed the ongoing impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. I also visited lessons, met with pupils and looked at pupils’ work. I have considered all this in coming to my judgement.

p.1

to improve the school, but more work is necessary for the school to become

The school should take further action to:

p.1

to improve the school, but more work is necessary for the school to become

 ensure the intended curriculum is implemented effectively in all subjects, for all pupils.

p.1

Main findings

There have been some changes to leadership roles since the last inspection. With support from the trust, leadership roles now clearly align with the school’s improvement priorities.

p.1

Main findings

This has enabled you to focus on improving areas such as attendance and behaviour. You have had a sharp focus on the development of the quality of education this year. Leaders have provided support to new and established staff to implement the curriculum more effectively so that pupils know and remember more. Staff are now more ambitious for pupils. Staff have higher expectations of what pupils can do. These higher expectations are starting to be reflected in pupils’ work and their engagement in learning. However, as some curriculum changes are still being embedded, this is not yet having an impact in all areas and for all pupils.

p.1

Main findings

You have continued to prioritise reading. Many pupils arrive at your school with reading ages below their chronological age. You have robust systems in place to support these pupils to catch up.

p.2

Main findings

Following the last inspection, you and your team have ensured that processes in place to support good behaviour are known by staff and pupils and followed consistently. Additionally, your work to eliminate derogatory language is having an impact. This has been recognised by pupils. Many pupils are positive about the school and value the relationships they have with adults.

p.2

Main findings

The school has been identified as a priority school within the trust. Trust leaders have supported you on your improvement journey. They systematically review aspects of your work and provide challenge through the Academy Priority Support Committee. This support has been effective. As a result, you have implemented clear and coherent systems, which are widely understood and used by all staff.

p.2

Main findings

I am copying this letter to the chair of the board of trustees and the chief executive officer of the Ambitions Academies Trust, the Department for Education’s regional director and the director of children’s services for Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole. This letter will be published on the Ofsted reports website.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion