Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
Stone Lodge Academy
Summary
Christine Dick (lead), Rowena Simmons
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
4 Jul 2023
- Inspectors verified
Christine Dick, Rowena Simmons
- Postcode verified
IP2 9HW
- Name on report verified
Stone Lodge Academy
- URN verified
141407
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Pupils who are at an early stage of learning to read, and older pupils who have fallen behind, however, do not always get the well-focused support they need to catch up quickly. p.1
- Some parents feel that relationships with the school are not as strong as they should be. p.3
- Curriculum plans do not consistently set out the detail of the knowledge and skills that pupils need to secure. p.3
- While the relationships between the school and families are typically positive, a minority of parents feel that these relationships are not as strong as they should be. p.2
- Leaders should ensure that any further staff training needed is p.3
- Leaders, including the LAB and the trust, should continue their work to develop relationships with families further. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance8
“Leaders promote high expectations of pupils’ behaviour in lessons and around the school.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,317
- about usual (typical 1153)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 58, typical 55
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 6
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 17%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of a good school: Stone Lodge Academy Stone Lodge Lane West, Ipswich, Suffolk IP2 9HW
p.1
Outcome
There has been no change to this school’s overall judgement of good as a result of this ungraded (section 8) inspection. However, the evidence gathered suggests that the inspection grade might not be as high if a graded (section 5) inspection were carried out now. Inspectors are recommending the next inspection to be a graded inspection.
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Stone Lodge pupils learn in a caring, supportive community. Many of them have had difficult educational experiences prior to joining the school. Typically, they settle in quickly. They begin to trust the adults who work with them, gain confidence, make friends and learn how to build positive relationships. Most pupils get on well together. In assembly, their applause was spontaneous and enthusiastic as they celebrated the winners of the design competition for the school logo and flag.
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Younger children enjoy reading and listening to the stories that staff share with them. Pupils who are at an early stage of learning to read, and older pupils who have fallen behind, however, do not always get the well-focused support they need to catch up quickly.
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils like swimming and outdoor activities, such as sailing and forest school. The pupil council represents others well, including by sharing ideas with leaders on how to improve school experiences. Pupils feel safe. They say that bullying happens sometimes. However, they know that staff will help them if they are concerned. The few pupils who find it harder to live up to the high standard of behaviour expected are supported to improve.
p.1
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
Leaders, including the local academy board (LAB) and the trust, are determined for all pupils to achieve well. However, a period of change has meant that they have not moved as quickly as they wanted to in securing their ambitious intentions.
p.1
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
Typically, staff have good subject knowledge. Most curriculum plans set out the headline content that pupils will learn. However, some of the plans are imprecise. This means that the small steps in knowledge and skills development that pupils will need and aspects of 3 and 4 July 2023
p.1
2
teachers’ assessments are unclear. The links between the primary and secondary curriculums are not defined well enough. Consequently, some staff have a limited understanding of what has been previously taught, or how it matches to what is coming next. Where this happens, opportunities to revisit prior learning, to help pupils to apply it to the next stage, are missed. As a result, pupils do not always progress as well as they could.
p.2
2
Supporting pupils to learn to read is a priority. The focus on reading has been strengthened. Younger pupils practise the sounds that letters make regularly. While most pupils improve their reading over time, interventions are not always targeted precisely enough to help pupils to improve quickly. Staff are still developing the consistency of their practice in using phonics to help pupils to read well. This means that pupils’ fluency in reading, spelling and writing is not developed as effectively as it could be.
p.2
2
Leaders promote high expectations of pupils’ behaviour in lessons and around the school. Staff use consistent language to reinforce these expectations. As a result, most pupils behave well and attend school regularly. They socialise together at breaktimes and interact positively with the adults who work with them. Where a few pupils find it harder to manage their feelings, they are supported to improve.
p.2
2
Pupils’ personal development is well promoted. They build their confidence and independence over their time in school. Pupils are taught important life skills such as baking and how to prepare simple dishes. The personal, social and health education (PSHE) curriculum develops their understanding of relevant issues, such as healthy relationships. Pupils are typically tolerant and respectful of individual differences. Opportunities for work experience for older pupils are increasing. Careers education helps them to make informed choices about their life beyond school. Most pupils go on to take college courses when they leave.
p.2
2
The LAB works closely with the trust board to continue to improve the school. Leaders and the trust are mindful of staff workload and well-being. While the relationships between the school and families are typically positive, a minority of parents feel that these relationships are not as strong as they should be.
p.2
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.2
Safeguarding
The school team works closely with the trust to ensure that the vulnerable pupils in their care are kept safe. Staff have the required safeguarding training, which is updated regularly. This means that they know what to do if they have any safeguarding concerns. All the necessary safer recruitment checks are completed on new staff before they join the school. Pupils are taught how to make safe choices, including when playing games online. Effective support networks in school and with external agencies make sure that pupils and families get extra help when they need it. 3 and 4 July 2023
p.2
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
Curriculum plans do not consistently set out the detail of the knowledge and skills that pupils need to secure. The links between the primary and the secondary phases of education are unclear. This lack of clarity means that activities are not always matched well to pupils’ needs and this slows some pupils’ progress. Leaders should ensure that plans are sufficiently precise and that teachers know what they need to do to adapt the curriculum at each stage. This is so that pupils build on strong foundations of previous learning and achieve their potential across subjects. Not enough staff are confident in providing effective support for pupils who need to catch up with their reading. The inconsistencies in phonics teaching mean that pupils do not improve their reading, spelling and writing fluency as much, or as rapidly, as they could. Leaders should ensure that any further staff training needed is
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
implemented quickly so that all those pupils who can are taught to read consistently and well. Some parents feel that relationships with the school are not as strong as they should be. This means that they do not always recognise leaders’ efforts in taking account of their views. Leaders, including the LAB and the trust, should continue their work to develop relationships with families further. This is so that, within the boundaries of confidentiality, the reasons why important decisions are taken are made clear to all relevant parties.
p.3
Background
When we have judged a school to be good, we will then normally go into the school about once every four years to confirm that the school remains good. This is called an ungraded inspection, and it is carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. We do not give graded judgements on an ungraded inspection. However, if we find evidence that a school would now receive a higher or lower grade, then the next inspection will be a graded inspection, which is carried out under section 5 of the Act. Usually this is within one to two years of the date of the ungraded inspection. If we have serious concerns about safeguarding, behaviour or the quality of education, we will deem the ungraded inspection a graded inspection immediately.
p.3
Background
This is the first ungraded inspection since we judged the predecessor school, Stone Lodge Academy, to be good in January 2018.
p.3
How can I feed back my views?
find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.3
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school. 3 and 4 July 2023
p.3
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.4
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 3 and 4 July 2023
p.4
School details
Inspection number 10268726 Type of school Special
p.5
School details
School category Academy special sponsor-led
p.5
School details
Headteacher Scott Gaskins (Executive Headteacher)
p.5
School details
Website https://sendat.academy/stonelodge/
p.5
School details
Date of previous inspection 16 and 17 January 2018, under section 5 of the Education Act 2005
p.5
Information about this school
Since the previous inspection, an executive headteacher has been appointed. The head of school, previously in the acting head of school role, took up the permanent post in January 2023. The school has also had a change of sponsor. It is now sponsored by the Special Educational Needs and Disabilities Academies Trust (SENDAT). Places are offered for pupils with moderate learning difficulties. Many pupils have wider, complex needs, such as social, emotional and mental health needs, autism, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and speech and language difficulties. The school makes use of two alternative providers. These providers offer bespoke provision for a small number of pupils.
p.5
Information about this inspection
This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with leaders and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school. 3 and 4 July 2023
p.5
6
The inspectors conducted deep dives in the following subjects: early reading, mathematics, music and physical education. To complete each deep dive, they discussed the curriculum with subject leaders, visited a sample of lessons and spoke with teachers. They also spoke with pupils about their learning and looked at samples of their work. To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, inspectors looked at safeguarding policies, the school’s record of pre-employment checks on new staff and a sample of child protection files. They also spoke with the LAB chair, trust leaders, the designated safeguarding lead, and other staff about safeguarding practices at the school. A range of meetings were held with the executive headteacher, the head of school and other leaders. A range of documents were checked, including behaviour logs, attendance records, minutes of the local academy board meetings, school improvement plans and school
p.6
6
policies. There were 36 responses to the online questionnaire, Ofsted Parent View, which were considered alongside 25 free-text responses from parents. Inspectors gathered pupils’ views through informal discussions and meetings with them during the inspection. There were 55 responses to Ofsted’s questionnaire for school staff. Inspectors also spoke with staff throughout the inspection to gather their views.
p.6
Inspection team
Christine Dick, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector
p.6
Inspection team
Rowena Simmons Ofsted Inspector 3 and 4 July 2023
p.6
7
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
7
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
7
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
7
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
7
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion