Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School monitoring visit

Setting

Inspected — · published 27 Sept 2023

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Ben Hill

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Ben Hill

  • Postcode verified

    BL3 5AG

  • Name on report verified

    University Collegiate School This letter sets out the findings from the monitoring inspection of your school that took

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−4Mixedmore positive than 28% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectiveimprovedhigh-qualitysuccessfullysecureimprovingpositiverigorous
Criticismweaknessesat riskconcernlackconcernsnot stronggapsharm

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings191w0
  • What needs to improve925w−4

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
1,116
shorter than usual (typical 1570)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 47, typical 47
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
11%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 17%What needs to improve 83%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

David Terry Interim Head of School University Collegiate School Deane Road Bolton Greater Manchester BL3 5AG

p.1

Special measures monitoring inspection of University Collegiate School

This letter sets out the findings from the monitoring inspection of your school that took place on 3 and 4 July 2023, on behalf of His Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills. The monitoring inspection was carried out under section 8(2) of the Education Act 2005 and was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require special measures following the graded (section 5) inspection that took place in December 2022.

p.1

Special measures monitoring inspection of University Collegiate School

During the inspection, I discussed with you and other senior leaders, the chief executive officer (CEO) of the multi-academy trust (MAT), other staff and trustees, members of the interim advisory board (IAB), representatives of the local authority and of your other external partners, the actions that have been taken to improve the school since the most recent graded inspection. We discussed the ongoing impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. I also met with groups of pupils and visited some lessons. I have considered all this in coming to my judgement.

p.1

measures. Leaders have made progress to improve the school, but more work

is necessary for the category of concern to be removed.

p.1

The progress made towards the removal of special measures

There have been substantial changes in leadership and governance at the school since the previous inspection. You were appointed as the interim head of school in February 2023, along with a new vice-principal. At the same time, trustees suspended the local governing body and established an IAB. The IAB has taken responsibility for governance of the school. Added to this, a considerable number of new teachers and subject leaders have been appointed recently, and the new MAT CEO took up his post on the day of the inspection. Given the pace and nature of these changes, you explained to me that your initial priorities have been to improve the arrangements for safeguarding, and pupils’ behaviour. We agreed that these two areas, plus governance and pupils’ wider personal development, would form the main areas of focus for the inspection.

p.2

The progress made towards the removal of special measures

You, other senior leaders and members of the IAB accept the weaknesses in the quality of education identified at the previous inspection. You also acknowledge that pupils were not benefiting from the distinctive education that befits a university technical college. However, the actions that you are taking speak clearly to your ambition to address this. In a relatively short time, you have successfully reorganised the structure and timetabling of the curriculum. This has laid the foundations for a stronger curriculum to be in place from September 2023. In particular, you have broadened the range of subjects in key stage 3. Pupils are now studying subjects equivalent in scope and ambition to the national curriculum. You recognise that it will still take time for pupils to experience the necessary depth of learning in these subjects. While this new curriculum is embedding, you understand that it is important for subject leaders to consider how to address the gaps in

p.2

The progress made towards the removal of special measures

pupils’ knowledge that remain as the legacy of the previous curriculum.

p.2

The progress made towards the removal of special measures

Subject leaders’ expertise in curriculum design is not as strong as it should be. Work to improve this has begun in earnest. The IAB and trust board have supported leaders by commissioning high-quality external support. This support is providing much-needed opportunities to develop subject leaders’ and teachers’ curriculum understanding. However, some of the generic approaches that teachers have been using to deliver the curriculum up to now are not as effective as they could be. This is because the subject- specific content of the curriculum has not been finalised.

p.2

The progress made towards the removal of special measures

You and other leaders have prioritised delivering some elements of the personal, social, health and economic (PSHE) education curriculum. Current pupils are gaining a deeper understanding of the importance of respecting one another. They are also increasingly learning how to keep themselves safe. Although this constitutes some improvements to pupils’ PSHE development, you recognise that the journey of improvement in this area has only just begun.

p.2

The progress made towards the removal of special measures

Since taking decisive action to secure effective leadership and governance, the board of trustees has provided you with clear strategic direction. Trustees are more acutely aware of the weaknesses in the school than they have been in the past. They have appointed leaders and members of the IAB who have the necessary understanding and skills to bring about sustainable change. Key governance structures have been restored. This is providing you and other leaders with the necessary oversight, support and challenge to help you to improve the school.

p.2

The progress made towards the removal of special measures

The action plans that you shared with me are thorough, detailed and appropriate. You have sensibly prioritised improving pupils’ behaviour, well-being and safety because you know that these are fundamental to improving the conditions for pupils’ learning. These areas have shown real signs of improvement. There is a palpable sense that everyone is invested in them. For example, there has been very little negativity from pupils around the introduction of new behaviour systems. Pupils who spoke with me were unanimous in their view that improved behaviour in lessons has already made their experience of school more positive.

p.3

The progress made towards the removal of special measures

A key focus during the inspection was to evaluate the extent to which current improvements are sustainable. At present, a great deal of responsibility falls to a small number of new or interim leaders. Some staff also expressed frustration in the lack of capacity for further improvements. However, trustees and executive leaders have a realistic, credible and measured approach to building capacity to improve the school further. They have forged strategic alliances with partners who will support leaders in the short term. Added to this, trustees and executive leaders are committed to making appropriate appointments to help to secure long-term improvements.

p.3

The progress made towards the removal of special measures

One of the most significant strides forward that you and your team have made in recent months has been to improve the arrangements for safeguarding. Safeguarding is now effective. You and other leaders have been determined in your approach to develop a culture of safeguarding in the school. Rigorous training has improved staff’s understanding of their safeguarding responsibilities. Furthermore, you have acted well on advice and support from the local authority. This has helped you to put robust systems in place for reporting and recording safeguarding concerns. Leaders now take swift and appropriate action to support pupils who may be at risk of harm. Processes to check the suitability of staff to work with children are now securely in place.

p.3

The progress made towards the removal of special measures

I am copying this letter to the chair of the IAB, the chair of the board of trustees and the CEO of the Quest MAT, the Department for Education’s regional director and the director of children’s services for Bolton. This letter will be published on the Ofsted reports website.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion